Referencias

• Altemeyer, B. (1981). Enemies of freedom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Antonak, R. E. & Livneh, H. (1995). Direct and indirect methods to measure attitudes toward persons with disabilities, with an exegesis of the error-choice test method. Rehabilitation education, 40, 25–38.
   Google Scholar
• Belgrave, F. Z. (1984). The effectiveness of strategies for increasing social interaction with a physically disabled person. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 14, 147–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belgrave, F. Z. & Mills, J. (1981). Effect upon desire for social interaction with a physically disabled person of mentioning the disability in different contexts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 11, 44–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britt, T. W., Boniecki, K. A., Vescio, T. K., Biernat, M. & Brown, L. M. (1996). Intergroup anxiety: A person x situation approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1177–1188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Lorenzo, R. (2004). El futuro de las discapacidades en el mundo: El empleo como factor determinante para la inclusión. Revista del Ministerio de Trabajo y de Asuntos Sociales, 50. http://www.mtas.es/Publica/revista/numeros/50/Est04.pdf (último acceso, 05-01-2008).
   Google Scholar
• Dijker, A. & Koomen, W. (2007). Stigmatization, Tolerance and Repair—An Integrative Psychological Analysis of Responses to Deviance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, J. (1980). Changing attitudes toward handicapped persons: A review and analyses of research. Exceptional children, 46 (7), 504–513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckitt, J. (2006). Differential Effects of Right Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation on Outgroup Attitudes and Their Mediation by Threat From and Competitiveness to Outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 684–696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esses, V. M., Dovidio, J. F., Jackson, L. M. & Armstrong, T. M. (2001). The inmigration dilemma: the role of perceived group competition, ethnic prejudice, and national identity. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 389–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P. & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82 (6), 878–902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastorf, A. H., Wildfogel, J. & Cassman, T. (1979). Acknowledgment of handicap as a tactic in a social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1790–1797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazer, J. T. & Bedell, K. W. (2000). Effects of seeking accommodation and disability on preemployment evaluations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 1201–1223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imserso (1998). Empleo y discapacidad. Madrid: Ministerio de Trabajo y Asuntos Sociales.
   Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T. & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system justification and the production of false conciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T., Fitzsimons G. & Kay, A. C. (2004). The ideological animal: A system justification view. En J. Greenberg, S. L. Koole & T. Pyszczynski (Eds.), Handbook of experimental existential psychology (pp. 263–283). Nueva York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T. & Hunyady, O. (2002). The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology. European Review of social Psychology, 13, 111–153.
   Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R. & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T. & Thompson, E. P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, E. L., Hendricks, W. & Broadbent, E. (2000). An exploration of access and treatment discrimination and job satisfaction among college graduates with and without physical disabilities. Human Relations, 53, 923–955.
   Google Scholar
• Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M. & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A Personality variable relevant to social roles and intergroup relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravaud, J. F., Madiot B. & Ville, I. (1992). Discrimination towards disabled people seeking employment. Social Science & Medicine, 35, 951–958.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz, J. & Moya, M. (2005). Antecedentes de la actitud hacia políticas de acción positiva a favor de las personas con discapacidad. Revista de Psicología Social, 20 (2), 213–232.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz, J. & Moya, M. (2007). El estudio de la discapacidad física desde la Psicología Social. Revista de Psicología Social, 22 (2), 177–198.
   Google Scholar
• Sheriff, M. (1966). Group conflict and cooperation. Their social psychology. Londres: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Sidanius, J., Liu, J., Pratto, F. & Shaw, J. (1994). Social dominance orientation, hierarchy-attenuators and hierarchy-enancers: Social theory and the criminal justice system. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 338–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidanius, J. & Pratto, F. (1993). The Inevitability of Oppression and the Dynamics of Social Dominance. En P. Sniderman & P. Tetlock (Eds.), Prejudice, Politics, and the American Dilemma (pp. 173–211). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sidanius, J. & Pratto, F. (2004). Social Dominance Theory: a new synthesis. En J. Jost & J. Sidanius, Political Psychology (pp. 315–332). Nueva York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sidanius, J., Pratto, F. & Bobo, L. (1994). Social dominance orientation and the political psychology of gender: A case of invariance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 998–1100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silván-ferrero, M. P. (2006). Actitudes hacia la discapacidad: Ambivalencia afectiva, ansiedad e interferencia en la interacción. Tesis doctoral no publicada. Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia.
   Google Scholar
• Silván-ferrero, M. P. & Bustillos, A. (2006). La percepción del estigma. En A. Gómez, E. Gaviria & I. Fernández (Eds.), Psicología Social (CD). Madrid: Sanz y Torres.
   Google Scholar
• Silván-ferrero, M. P. & Bustillos, A. (2007). Adaptación de la escala de Orientación a la Dominancia Social al castellano: Validación del Oposición a la igualdad y dominancia grupal como factores subyacentes. Revista de Psicología Social, 22 (1), 3–17.
   Google Scholar
• Stephan, W. G. & Stephan, C. W. (1985). Intergroup anxiety. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 157–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephan, W. G. & Stephan, C. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. En S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 23–43). Mahwah: L.E.A
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. L. & Colella, A. (1996). A model of factors affecting the treatment of disabled individuals in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 21 (2), 352–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdugo, M. A. (1994). Actitudes hacia las personas con minusvalía. Madrid: Ministerio de Asuntos Sociales.
   Google Scholar
• Yuker, H. E. (1988). The effect of contact on attitudes toward disabled persons: some empirical generalizations. En H. E. Yuker (Ed.), Attitudes toward people with disabilities (pp. 262–274). Nueva York: Springer.
   Google Scholar