References

• Anderson, C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2006). Power, optimism, and risktaking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 511–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of research on mood and creativity: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? Psychological Bulletin, 134, 779–806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2011). When prevention promotes creativity: The role of mood, regulatory focus, and regulatory closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 794–809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Dreu, C. K. W. (2010). Social conflict: The emergence and consequences of struggle and negotiation. In S. T. Fiske, D. T Gilbert & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 983–1023). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• De Dreu, C. K. W., Baas, M., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). Hedonic tone and activation level in the mood-creativity link: Toward a dual pathway to creativity model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 739–756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Dreu, C. K. W., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2004). The influence of power on the information search, impression formation, and demands in negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 303–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellemers, N., Van Knippenberg, A., & Wilke, H. (1990). The influence of permeability of group boundaries and stability of group status on strategies of individual mobility and social change. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 233–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Förster, J. (2009). Relations between perceptual and conceptual scope: How global versus local processing fits a focus on similarity versus dissimilarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 88–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, J. R. P., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright & A. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics (pp. 150–167). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Magee, J. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 453–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Gruenfeld, D. H., Whitson, J. A., & Liljenquist, K. A. (2008). Power reduces the press of the situation: Implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1450–1466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greer, L. L., Caruso, H. M., & Jehn, K. A. (2011). The bigger they are, the harder they fall: Linking team power, conflict, congruence, and team performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116, 116–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greer, L. L., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2010). Equality versus differentiation: The effects of power dispersion on group interaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1032–1044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guinote, A. (2007a). Power affects basic cognition: Increased attentional inhibition and flexibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 685–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guinote, A. (2007b). Power and goal pursuit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1076–1087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harkins, S. (2006). Mere effort as the mediator of the evaluation-performance relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 436–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1122–1131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, C., Dowd, T. J., & Ridgeway, C. L. (2006). Legitimacy as social process. Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 53–78
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keltner, D., Van Kleef, G. A., Chen, S., & Kraus, M. W. (2008). A reciprocal influence model of social power: Emerging principles and lines of inquiry. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 152–192.
   Google Scholar
• Lammers, J., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). How the conceptualization and nature of interdependency moderates the effects of power. In D. Tjosvold & B. van Knippenberg (Eds.), Power and interdependence in organizations (pp. 67–82). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lammers, J., Galinsky, A. D., Gordijn, E. H., & Otten, S. (2008). Illegitimacy moderates the effects of power on approach. Psychological Science, 19, 558–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lammers, J., Stapel, D. A., & Galinsky, A. D. (2010). Power increases hypocrisy. Psychological Science, 21, 737–744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lammers, J., Stoker, J., & Stapel, D. A. (2010). Power and behavioral approach orientation in existing power relations and the mediating effect of income. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 543–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Academy of Management Annals, 2, 351–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maner, J. K., Gaillot, M. T., Butz, D. A., & Peruche, B. M. (2007). Power, risk, and the Status Quo: Does power promote riskier or more conservative decision making? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 451–462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maner, J. K., & Mead, N. L. (2010). The essential tension between leadership and power: When leaders sacrifice group goals for the sake of self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 482–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martorana, P. V., Galinsky, A. D., & Rao, H. (2005). From system justification to system condemnation: Antecedents of attempts to change status hierarchies. In M. A. Neale, E. A. Mannix & M. Thomashunt (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams: vol. 7: Status and groups (pp. 283–313). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mednick, M. T. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijstad, B. A., De Dreu, C. K. W., Rietzschel, E. F., & Baas, M. (2010). The dual-pathway to creativity model: Creative ideation as a function of flexibility and persistence. European Review of Social Psychology, 21, 34–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-bailón, R., Moya, M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2000). Why do superiors attend to negative stereotypic information about their subordinates? Effects of power legitimacy on social perception. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 651–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheepers, D. (2009). Turning social identity threat into challenge: Status stability and cardiovascular reactivity during intergroup competition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 228–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheepers, D., & Ellemers, N. (2005). When the pressure is up: The assessment of social identity threat in low and high status groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 192–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sligte, D. J., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2011). Power, stability of power, and creativity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 891–897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. (1984). Intergroup relations, social myths and social justice in social psychology. The Social Dimension: European Developments in Social Psychology, 2, 695–715.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C., & Brown, R. J. (1978). Social status, cognitive and intergroup relations. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups (pp. 201–234). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 115–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Kleef, G. A., De Dreu, C. K. W., Pietroni, D., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2006). Power and emotion in negotiation: Power moderates the interpersonal effects of anger and happiness on concession making. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 557–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, G. B., Guinote, A., & Rodríguez-bailón, R. (2010). Illegitimacy improves goal pursuit in powerless individuals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 416–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, G. B., & Rodríguez-bailón, R. (2010). When subordinates think of their ideals: Power, legitimacy and regulatory focus. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 13, 777–787.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, G. B., & Rodríguez-bailón, R. (2011). Si merezco tener poder, ¿qué más puedo esperar? Poder, legitimidad y optimismo [What do power-holders expect? Power, legitimacy, and optimism]. Revista de Psicología Social, 26, 241–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar