Referencias

• Angelo, T. (1999). Doing Assessment As If Learning Matters Most. American Association for Higher Education Bulletin, Mayo. Disponible en Internet en www.aahebulletin.com/public/archive/angelomay99.asp.
   Google Scholar
• Atienza, E. & López, C. (1996). El contexto en el discurso académico: su influencia en la presentación y desarrollo de la informacion. Tabanque, revista pedagógica, 10–11, 123–129.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, J. & Vardi, I. (1999). Iterative feedback: impacts on student writing. Ponencia presentada en la Conferencia Internacional Anual de la Sociedad de Australasia para la Investigación y Desarrollo de la Educación Superior, Melbourne, julio de 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Baudelot, CH. (1965). Student Rhetoric in Exams. En P. Bordieu et al., Academic discourse (pp. 80–94). Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32, 347–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. (1998). What the student does: teaching for enhanced learning in the '90s. Actas de la Conferencia Internacional Anual de la Sociedad de Australasia para la Investigación y el Desarrollo de la Educación Superior, julio de 1998, Auckland.
   Google Scholar
• Bridge, C. (1993). College Freshmen Writing Across the Curriculum: a Case Study of Student's Motivations for Revising. Tesis Doctoral, School of Education, University of Kentucky.
   Google Scholar
• Bugnard, PH. (1997). L'invention de l'examen. Résonances, 8.
   Google Scholar
• Bunker, A. (1996). Can altering the assessment for a unit encourage students to engage with content and processes, and be reflective about their learning, rather than focus on superficial detail? En J. Abbot & L. Willcoxson (Eds.), Teaching and Learning Within and Across Disciplines (pp. 33–39). Actas de la quinta conferencia anual del Teaching Learning Forum, febrero de 1996, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Candy, PH. (1995). Developing lifelong learners through undergraduate education. En L. Summers (Ed.), A Focus on Learning (pp. ii-viii). Actas de la cuarta conferencia anual del Foro de Enseñanza y Aprendizaje, febrero de 1995, Perth, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Carlino, P. (2001). Hacerse cargo de la lectura y la escritura en la enseñanza universitaria de las ciencias sociales y humanas. Ponencia presentada en las Jornadas sobre La lectura y la escritura como prácticas academicas universitarias, Universidad Nacional de Luján, junio de 2001. Disponible en Internet en: www.unlu.edu.ar/∼redecom/
   Google Scholar
• Carlino, P. (2002a). Enseñar a escribir en la universidad. Cómo lo hacen en Estados Unidos y por qué. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, versión digital, agosto. Disponible en Internet en: www.campus-oei.org/revista/deloslectores/279carlino.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Carlino, P. (2002b).Enseñar a planificar y a revisar los textos académicos: Haciendo lugar en el currículum a la función epistémica de la escritura. Comunicacion Libre en las IX Jornadas de Investigación, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Buenos Aires, agosto de 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Carlino, P. (2002c).¿Quién debe ocuparse de enseñar a leer y a escribir en la universidad? Tutorías, simulacros de examen y síntesis de clases en las humanidades. Lectura y Vida. Revista latinoamericana de lectura, 23, 1, 6–14.
   Google Scholar
• Carlino, P. (2003). Leer textos complejos al comienzo de la educación superior: tres situaciones did´acticas para afrontar el dilema. Textos. Didáctica de la lectura y la escritura, 33, 43–51.
   Google Scholar
• Chamberlain, CH., Dison, L. & Button, A. (1998). Lecturer feedback—Implications for developing writing skills: a South African perspective. Actas de la Conferencia Internacional Anual de la Sociedad de Australasia para la Investigación y el Desarrollo de la Educaci´on Superior, julio de 1998, Auckland.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, B. & Radloff, A. (1997). How can we 'unstuff the curriculum? En R. Pospisil & L. Willcoxson (Eds.), Learning Through Teaching (pp. 118–123). Proceedings of the 6th. Annual Teaching Learning Forum, Perth: University of Western Australia, febrero 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Hjortshoj, K. (1996). Responding to Student Writing. Knight Writing Program. Nueva York: Cornell University.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, I., Carifio, J. & Dagostino, L. (1998). The Effect of Diagnostic and Prescriptive Comments on Revising Behavior of Community College Students. Educational Eric Document, 417449, 39 p.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffery, F. & Selting, B. (1999). Reading the Invisible Ink: Assessing the Responses of Non-Composition Faculty. Assessmg Writing, 6 (2), 179–197.
   Google Scholar
• Lawe davies, R. (1999). How do we define and teach ‘relevance’ in academic writing. En K. Martin, N. Stanley & N. Davison (Eds.), Teaching in the Disciplines/Learning in Context (pp. 220–223). Proceedings of the 8th. Annual Teaching Learning Forum, Perth: University of Western Australia, febrero 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Leahy, R. (1994). What makes the Writing Center interesting? Word Works, 67.
   Google Scholar
• Lehr, F. (1995). Revision in the Writing Process. Educational Eric Document, 379664, 4 p.
   Google Scholar
• Libedinsky, M. (1998). Evaluación del aprendizaje en la universidad. Ponencia presentada en el IX Encontro Nacional de Didática e Prática do Ensino. Universidad de San Pablo, mayo de 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Mcloughlin, C. (1995). Assessment of writing in multicultural settings. En L. Summers (Ed.), A Focus on Learnin (pp. 165–171) Actas de la cuarta Conferencia anual del Foro de Enseñanza y Aprendizaje, Perth, Australia, febrero de 1995, Edith Cowan University.
   Google Scholar
• Mosher, J. (1997). Responding to students papers. Responses to avoid and productive advice to give. Teaching with Writing, 7, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Patthey-Chavez, G. & Ferris, D. (1997). Writing Conferences and the Weaving of Multi-Voiced Texts in College Composition. Research in the Teaching of English, 31, 1, 51–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radloff, A. (1996). Can assignment sheets promote learning and performance? En J. Abbot & L. Willcoxson (Eds.), Teaching and Learning Within and Across Disciplines (pp. 135–139). Actas de la quinta conferencia anual del Teaching Learning Forum, febrero de 1996, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Radloff, A. & De LA Harpe, B. (2001). Expanding what and how we assess: Going beyond the content. En A. Herrmann & M. Kulski (Eds.), Expanding Horizons in Teaching and Learning. Actas de la décima Conferencia anual del Teaching Learning Forum, febrero de 2001, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Santhanam, E. (2002). Congruence of teaching, learning, assessment and evaluation. En Focusing on the Student. Actas de la undécima Conferencia anual del Teaching Learning Forum, febrero de 2002, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M. & Bereiter, C. (1985). Development of dialectical processes in composition. En D. Olson, N. Torrance & A. Hildyard, Literacy, Language and Learning (pp. 307–329). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schriver, K. (1990). Evaluating Text Quality: The Continuum from Text-Focused to Reader-Focused Methods Technical Report n° 41. Educational ERIC Document, 318009, 42 p.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, H. (1984). Responding to Student Essays. En F. Bogel & K. Gottschalk, Teaching Prose: A Guide for Writing Instructors(pp. 114–154). Nueva York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Sommers, N. (1980). Revision Strategies of Student Writers and Experienced Adult Writers. College Composition and Communication, 31, 378–388.
   Google Scholar
• Sommers, N. (1982). Responding to Student Writing. College Composition and Communication, 33, 2, 148–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straub, R. (1997). Student's Reactions to Teacher Comments: An Exploratory Study. Research in the Teaching of English, 31, 1, 91–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straub, R. (2000). The student, the text, and the classroom context: A case study of teacher response. Assessing Writing 7, 23–55.
   Google Scholar
• Suskie, L. (2000). Fair Assessment Practices. Giving Students Equitable Opportunities to Demonstrate Learning. American Association for Higher Education Bulletin, Mayo. Disponible en Internet en www.aahebulletin.com/public/archive/may2.asp.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, D. & Hayes, J (1991). Redefining Revision for Freshmen. Research in the Teaching of English, 25, 1, 54–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, E. (1994). Responding to Student Writing. En Teaching and Assessing Writing (pp. 103–118). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar