Referencias

• Alamargot, D. & Chanquoy, L. (2001). Through the Models of Writing. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alvarado, M. & Silvestre, A. (2003). Introducción, la composición escrita: procesos y enseñanza. Cultura y Educación, 15, 7–15.
   Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C. & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The Psychology of Written Composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. What the student does. Buckingham: Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Borzone, A. M. & Diuk, B. (2003). La escritura de textos en niños pequeños: conocimiento ortográfico y producción textual. Cultura y Educación, 15, 17–27.
   Google Scholar
• Braaksma, M. A. H., Rijlaarsdam, G., Van DEN Bergh, H. & Van hout-wolters, B. H. A. (2004). Observational learning and its effects on the orchestration of writing processes. Cognition and Instruction, 22 (1), 1–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braaksma, M. A.H., Van DEN Bergh, H., Rijlaarsdam, G. & Couzijn, M. (2001). Effective learning activities in observation tasks when learning to write and read argumentative texts. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 1, 33–48.
   Google Scholar
• Chartier, A. M. & Hébrard, J. (2000). Saber leer y escribir: unas herramientas mentales que tienen su historia. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 89, 11–24.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
   Google Scholar
• Couzijn, M. (1999). Learning to write by observation of writing and reading processes: Effects on learning and transfer. Learning and Instruction, 2, 109–142.
   Google Scholar
• Fidalgo, R. (2005). La metacognición en la composición escrita desde perspectivas psicológicas. Revisión, medida e instrucción. Tesis doctoral no publicada, Universidad de León, España.
   Google Scholar
• Fidalgo, R. & García, J. N. (2008). Instrucción de la auto-regulación y el auto-conocimiento en la composición escrita. Barcelona: Davinci Continental.
   Google Scholar
• Fidalgo, R. & García, J. N. (en prensa). Una revisión internacional de la instrucción metacognitiva en la composición escrita. Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada.
   Google Scholar
• Fidalgo, R., Torrance, M. & García, J. N. (en prensa). The long term effects of writing strategy instruction for young writers. Contemporary Educational Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• García, J. N. & Fldalgo, R. (2003). Diferencias en la conciencia de los procesos psicológicos de la escritura: mecánicos frente a sustantivos y otros. Psicothema, 15, 41–48.
   Google Scholar
• García, J. N. & Fidalgo, R. (2004). El papel del autoconocimiento de los procesos psicológicos de la composición escrita en la calidad de las composiciones escritas. Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada, 56, 239–253.
   Google Scholar
• García, J. N. & Fidalgo, R. (2006). Effects of two self-regulatory instruction programs in students with Learning Disabilities in writing products, process and self-efficacy. Learning Disability Quarterly, 29 (3), 181–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García, J. N. & Marbán, J. M. (2003). El proceso de composición escrita es alumnos con DA y/o BR: estudio instruccional con énfasis en la planificación. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 26, 97–113.
   Google Scholar
• Gaspar, M. P. & Otañi, I. (2003). El papel de la gramática en la enseñanza de la escritura. Culturay Educación, 15, 47–57.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. (2006). Strategy instruction and the teaching of writing: A meta-analysis. En C.A. Macarthur; S. Graham & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 187–207). Nueva York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. & Harris, K. R. (2000). The role of self-regulation and Transcription Skills in Writing and Writing Development. Educational Psychologist, 35, 3–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S. & Harris, K. R. (2003). Students with learning disabilities and the process of writing: A meta-analysis of SRSD studies. En H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 323–344). Nueva York: The Guildford Press
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. & Perin, D. (2007a). A Meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescents students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 445–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S. & Perin, D. (2007b). Writing next. Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools. Nueva York: Alliance for Excellent Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hartman, H. J. (2001). Metacognition in learning and instruction. Theory, Research and Practice. Nueva York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, J. R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. En C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences and applications (pp. 1–27). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, J. R. (2004). What triggers revision? En L. Allal, L. Chanquoy & P. Largy (Eds.), Studies in writing: Vol 13. Revision: Cognitive and instructional processes (pp. 9–20). Norwell, MA: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, J. & Flower, L. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. En L. Gregg & E. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 3–30). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kellogg, R. (1996). A model of working memory in writing. En C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 57–71). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kellogg, R. (1999). Components of working memory in text production. En M. Torrance & G. C. Jeffery (Eds.), The cognitive demands of Writing: Processing capacity and working memory in text production (pp. 42–61). Ámsterdam: Ámsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Macarthur, C. A., Graham, S. & Fitzgerald, J. (2006). Handbook of writing research. Nueva York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olive, T., Kellogg, R. T. & Piolat, A. (2002). The triple task technique for studying the process of writing. En T. Olive & C. M. Levy (Eds.), Contemporary Tools and Techniques for Studying Writing (pp. 31–61). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., Wolters, C. A. & Baxter, G. P. (2000). Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulated Learning. En G. Schraw & J. C. Impara (Eds.), Issues in the measurement of metacognition (pp. 43–97). Nebraska-Lincoln: Buros Institute of Mental Measures.
   Google Scholar
• Ramos, J. L., Cuadrado, I. & Iglesias, B. (2005). La composición escrita en el alumnado de Educación Primaria y Secundaria. Cultura y Educación, 17, 239–251.
   Google Scholar
• Sorenson, S. (1997). Student writing handbook: the only complete guide to writing across the curriculum (3rd ed.). Nueva York: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, N. L. & Glenn, C. G. (1975). A Developmental Study of Children's Recall of Story Material. Comunicación presentada en el Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development (Denver, Colorado, April 10–13, 1975)
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, M., Fidalgo, R. & García, J. N. (2007). The teachability and effectiveness of strategies for cognitive self-regulation in sixth grade writers. Learning and Instruction, 17, 265–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotski, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, B. Y. L., Harris, K. R., Graham, S. & Butler, D. (2003). Cognitive strategies instruction research in learning disabilities. En H.L. Swanson; K.R. Harris; S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 323–344). Nueva York: The Guildford Press
   Google Scholar
• Yausaz, F. (2005). El desarrollo de habilidades de escritura de textos en niños pequeños: el impacto de un taller escolar de composición. Cultura y Educación, 17, 349–360.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Developing Self-Fulfilling Cycles of Academic Regulation: An Analysis of Exemplary Instructional Models. En D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-Regulated Learning. From Teaching to Self-Reflective Practice (pp. 1–19). Nueva York: Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: a social cognitive perspective. En M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. & Risemberg, R. (1997). Becoming a proficient writer: A self-regulatory perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 73–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar