From nuclear to renewable: Energy system transformation and public attitudes

References

• AitkenM (2010) Wind power and community benefits: Challenges and opportunities. Energy Policy 38(10): 6066–6075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BellD GrayT HaggettC (2005) The ‘social gap’ in wind farm policy siting decisions: Explanations and policy responses. Environmental Politics 14(4): 460–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BickerstaffK LorenzoniI PidgeonNF (2008) Re-framing nuclear power in the UK energy debate: Nuclear power, climate change mitigation and radioactive waste. Public Understanding of Science 17(2): 145–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BoholmÅ LöfstedtR (2004) Facility Siting: Risk Power and Identity in Land Use Planning. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• ButlerC ParkhillKA PidgeonNF (2011) Nuclear power after Japan: The social dimensions. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 53(6): 3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CornerA VenablesD SpenceA (2011) Nuclear power, climate change and energy security: Exploring British public attitudes. Energy Policy 39(9): 4823–4833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CottonM Devine-WrightP (2011) NIMBYism and community consultation in electricity transmission network planning. In; Devine-WrightP (ed.) Renewable Energy and the Public: From NIMBY to Participation. London: Earthscan, 115–130.
   Google Scholar
• DemskiC (2011) Public perceptions of renewable energy technologies: Challenging the notion of widespread support. Doctoral thesis, Cardiff University.
   Google Scholar
• Devine-WrightP (2011) Renewable Energy and the Public: From NIMBY to Participation. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• DietzT SternPC (2008) Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Decision-Making. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• DunlapRE (2008) The New Environmental Paradigm Scale: From marginality to worldwide use. Journal of Environmental Education 40(1): 3–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FlynnJ (2003) Nuclear stigma. In: PidgeonN KaspersonRE SlovicP The Social Amplification of Risk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 326–354.
   Google Scholar
• FriedmanS (2011) Three Mile Island, Chernobyl and Fukushima: An analysis of traditional and new media coverage of nuclear accidents and radiation. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 67(5): 55–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GreenbergM TrueloveHB (2009) Energy choices and risk beliefs: Is it just global warming and fear of a nuclear power plant accident?. Energy Policy 31(5): 819–831.
   Google Scholar
• HechtG (1998) The Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and National Identity after World War II. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• KaspersonJX KaspersonRE PidgeonNF (2003) The social amplification of risk: Assessing fifteen years of research and theory. In: PidgeonN KaspersonRE SlovicPThe Social Amplification of Risk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 13–46.
   Google Scholar
• KunreutherH FitzgeraldK AartsT (1993) Siting noxious facilities: A test of the facility siting credo. Risk Analysis 13(6): 301–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGowanF SauterR (2005) Public Opinion on Energy Research: A Desk Study for the Research Councils. Brighton: University of Sussex.
   Google Scholar
• McGrathM (2008) Britain’s happiest places mapped. BBC, August 28. Available at: news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7584321.stm.
   Google Scholar
• McLachlanC (2010) Technologies in place: Symbolic interpretations of renewable energy. Sociological Review 57(2): 181–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MorganMG FischhoffB BostronA (2002)Risk Communication: A Mental Models Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• NisbetMC (2009) Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment 51(2): 12–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD and Nuclear Energy Agency (2010) Public Attitudes to Nuclear Power. NEA No. 6859. Paris. Available at: www.oecd-nea.org/ndd/reports/2010/nea6859-public-attitudes.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ParkhillKA PidgeonNF HenwoodKL (2010) From the familiar to the extraordinary: Local residents’ perceptions of risk when living with nuclear power in the UK. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 35(1): 39–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PidgeonNF HoodC JonesD (1992) Risk perception. Risk Analysis, Perception and Management: Report of a Royal Society Study Group. London: Royal Society.
   Google Scholar
• PidgeonNF LorenzoniI PoortingaW (2008) Climate change or nuclear power—No thanks! A quantitative study of public perceptions and risk framing in Britain. Global Environmental Change 18(1): 69–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RamanaMV (2011) Nuclear power and the public. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 67(4): 43–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RennO WeblerT WiedemannP (1995) Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• RosaEA DunlapRE (1994) Nuclear power: Three decades of public opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly 58(2): 295–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SlovicP FischhoffB LichtensteinS (1980) Facts and fears: Understanding perceived risk. In: SchwingR AlbersWASocietal Risk Assessment. New York: Plenum, 181–214.
   Google Scholar
• SlovicP FlynnJ LaymanM (1991) Perceived risk, trust, and the politics of nuclear waste. Science 254(5038): 1603–1607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SturgisP AllumN (2004) Science in society: Re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes. Public Understanding of Science 13(1): 55–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UphamP ShackleyS (2006) Stakeholder opinion of a proposed 21.5 MWe biomass gasifier in Winkleigh, Devon: Implications for bioenergy planning and policy. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 8(1): 45–66.
   Google Scholar
• VajjhalaSP FischbeckPS (2007) Quantifying siting difficulty: A case study of US transmission line siting. Energy Policy 35(1): 650–671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VenablesD PidgeonN HenwoodK (2009) Living with nuclear power: A Q-method study of local community perceptions. Risk Analysis 29(8): 1089–1104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WarrenCR McFadyenM (2010) Does community ownership affect public attitudes to wind energy? A case study from south-west Scotland. Land Use Policy 27(2): 204–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WelshI (2000) Mobilising Modernity: The Nuclear Moment. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• WhitmarshL UphamP PoortingaW (2011) Public Attitudes, Understanding, and Engagement in relation to Low-Carbon Energy: A Selective Review of Academic And Non-Academic Literatures. London: Research Councils UK.
   Google Scholar
• WilliamsS (2011) 1,500 at Mid Wales wind farm protest. Daily Post, June 30. Available at: www.dailypost.co.uk/news/local-north-wales-news/welshpool-news/2011/06/30/1-500-at-mid-wales-wind-farm-protest-55578-28967125/.
   Google Scholar
• WynneB IrwinA (1996) Misunderstanding Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar