Exploring Contemporary Views on Therapeutic Relating in Transactional Analysis Game Theory

References

• AllenJ. R. (1996). Introduction. In BerneE. Games people play: The psychology of human relationships (pp. v–xvi). New York, NY: Ballantine Books.
   Google Scholar
• AllenJ. R. (2003). Concepts, competencies, and interpretive communities. Transactional Analysis Journal, 33, 126–147.
   Google Scholar
• BenjaminJ. (1995). Like subject, love objects: Essays on recognition and sexual difference. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• BerneE. (1957). Intuition V: The ego image. Psychiatric Quarterly, 31, 611–627.
   Google Scholar
• BerneE. (1964). Games people play: The psychology of human relationships. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.
   Google Scholar
• BerneE. (1970). Sex in human loving. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• BerneE. (1975). What do you say after you say hello? The psychology of human destiny. London, England: Corgi Books. ( Original work published 1972)
   Google Scholar
• BerneE. (1976). Pathological significance of games. In Transactional analysis bulletin: Selected articles from volumes 1 through 9 (pp. 17–18). San Francisco, CA: TA Press. ( Original work published 1964)
   Google Scholar
• BrombergP. (2006). Awakening the dreamer: Clinical journeys. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• CornellW. F. (2000). If Berne met Winnicott: Transactional analysis and relational analysis. Transactional Analysis Journal, 30, 270–275.
   Google Scholar
• CornellW. F.Bonds-WhiteF. (2008). Therapeutic relatedness in transactional analysis: The truth of love or the love of truth. In CornellW. F. Explorations in transactional analysis: The Meech Lake papers (pp. 66–77). Pleasanton, CA: TA Press. ( Original work published 2001)
   Google Scholar
• CornellW. F.HargadenH. (Eds.). (2005). From transactions to relations: The emergence of a relational tradition in transactional analysis. Chadlington, England: Haddon Press.
   Google Scholar
• CornellW. F.LandaicheN. M. III (2006). Impasse and intimacy: Applying Berne’s concept of script protocol. Transactional Analysis Journal, 36, 196–213. ( Original work published in Italian in 2005 in Rivista Italiana di Analisi Transazionale e Metodologie Psicoterapeutiche,25(11), 35–60)
   Google Scholar
• EnglishF. (1971). The substitution factor: Rackets and real feelings, part I. Transactional Analysis Journal, 1(4), 27–32.
   Google Scholar
• EnglishF. (1972). Rackets and real feelings, part II. Transactional Analysis Journal, 2(1), 23–25.
   Google Scholar
• EusdenS. (2011). Minding the gap: Ethical considerations for therapeutic engagement. Transactional Analysis Journal, 41, 101–113.
   Google Scholar
• FairbairnW. R. D. (1952). Psychoanalytic studies of the personality. London, England: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• FermiE. (1934). An attempt of a theory of beta radiation. Physics, 88, 161–177.
   Google Scholar
• HargadenH.SillsC. (2002). Transactional analysis: A relational approach. Hove, England: Brunner-Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• KarpmanS. B. (1968). Fairy tales and script drama analysis. Transactional Analysis Bulletin, 7(26), 39–43.
   Google Scholar
• KarpmanS. B.D’AngeloA. (1976). Feeling rackets. Transactional Analysis Journal, 6, 339–343.
   Google Scholar
• KohutH. (1971). The analysis of the self: A systematic approach to the psychoanalytic treatment of narcissistic personality disorder. New York, NY: International Universities Press.
   Google Scholar
• LeDouxJ. E. (1998). The emotional brain: The mysterious underpinnings of emotional life. New York, NY: Touchstone.
   Google Scholar
• LewinK. (1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers (CartwrightD., Ed.). New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• LittleR. (2006). Ego state relational units and resistance to change. Transactional Analysis Journal, 36, 7–19.
   Google Scholar
• LittleR. (2011). Impasse clarification within the transference-countertransference matrix. Transactional Analysis Journal, 41, 23–38.
   Google Scholar
• LloydS. (2006). Programming the universe: A quantum computer scientist takes on the cosmos. New York, NY: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• ManciaM. (Ed.). (2006). Psychoanalysis and neuroscience. Milan, Italy: Springer-Verlag Italia.
   Google Scholar
• MenningerK. (1958). Theory of psychoanalytic technique. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• NorthropR. B. (2010). Introduction to complexity and complex systems. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• PieriniA. (2009). Il ruolo delle relazioni primarie nella costruzione di sé: Dal protocollo alla felicità [The role of primary relationships in the construction of self: From protocol to happiness]. Rivista Italiana di Analisi Transazionale e Metodologie Psicoterapeutiche, XXIX, 19(56), 51–64.
   Google Scholar
• RomaniniM. T. (1999). Costruirsi persona [ Building ourselves as a person]. Milano, Italy: La Vita Felice.
   Google Scholar
• SchacterD. (1996). Searching for memory: The brain, the mind, and the past. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• SchoreA. N. (1994). Affect regulation and the origin of the self: The neurobiology of emotional development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• SchoreA. N. (2003). Affect regulation and the repair of the self. New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• SchoreA. N. (2008). Modern attachment theory: The central role of affect regulation in development and treatment. Clinical Social Work Journal, 36, 9–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchoreA. N. (2014). Early interpersonal neurobiological assessment of attachment and autistic spectrum disorders. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShadboltC. (2012). The place of failure and rupture in psychotherapy. Transactional Analysis Journal, 42, 5–16.
   Google Scholar
• SiegelD. J. (1999). The developing mind: How relationships and the brain interact to shape who we are. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• StarkM. (1999). Modes of therapeutic action: Enhancement of knowledge, provision of experience, and engagement in relationship. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• SteinerC. (1974). Scripts people live: Transactional analysis of life scripts. New York, NY: Grove Press.
   Google Scholar
• StuthridgeJ. (2012). Traversing the fault lines: Trauma and enactment. Transactional Analysis Journal, 42, 238–251.
   Google Scholar
• SummersG.TudorK. (2000). Cocreative transactional analysis. Transactional Analysis Journal, 30, 23–40.
   Google Scholar
• TrevarthenC. (1979). Communication and cooperation in early infancy: A description of primary intersubjectivity. In BullowaM. (Ed.), Before speech: The beginning of interpersonal communication (pp. 321–347). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• TrevarthenC. (1996). Lateral asymmetries in infancy: Implication for the development of the hemispheres. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 20, 571–586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TronickE. Z. (2004). Why is connection with others so critical? The formation of dyadic states of consciousness and the expansion of individuals’ states of consciousness: Coherence governed selection and the co-creation of meaning out of messy meaning making. In NadelJ.MuirD. W. (Eds.), Emotional development: Recent research advances (pp. 293–315). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• TronickE. Z. (2007). The neurobehavioral and social-emotional development of infants and children. New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• TudorK.SummersG. (2014). Co-creative transactional analysis: Papers, responses, dialogues, and developments. London, England: Karnac Books.
   Google Scholar
• WatzlawickP.BeavinJ. H.JacksonD. D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• WeinerN. (1950). The human use of human beings: Cybernetics and society. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• ŽvelcG. (2010). Relational schemas theory and transactional analysis. Transactional Analysis Journal, 40, 8–22.
   Google Scholar