Further Evaluation of the Outcome Questionnaire–45.2

References

• BeretvasS. N.KearneyL. K. (2003). A shortened form of the Outcome Questionnaire: A validation of scores across groups (A research report of the Research Consortium of Counseling and Psychological Services for Higher Education). : Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• BlancoC.OkudaM.WrightC.HasinD. S.GrantB. F.LiuS.OlfsonM. (2008). Mental health of college students and their non-college-attending peers: Results from the National Epidemiologic Study on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Archives of General Psychiatry, 65, 1429–1437. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.65.12.1429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BludworthJ. L.TraceyT. J. G.Glidden-TraceyC. (2010).The bilevel structure of the Outcome Questionnaire-45. Psychological Assessment, 22, 350–355. doi:10.1037/a0019187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BontempoD. E.HoferS. M. (2007). Assessing factorial invariance in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. In OngA. D.van DulmenM. H. M. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of methods in positive psychology (pp. 153–175). : Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• BovairdJ. A.KoziolN. A. (2012). Measurement models for ordered-categorical indicators. In HoyleR. (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 495–511). : Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• ChenF. (2008). What happens if we compare chopsticks with forks? The impact of making inappropriate comparisons in cross-cultural research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1005–1018. doi:10.1037/a0013193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DimitrovD. M. (2010). Testing for factorial invariance in the context of construct validation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 43, 121–149. doi:10.1177/0748175610373459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EllsworthJ. R.LambertM. J.JohnsonJ. (2006). A comparison of the Outcome Questionnaire-30 in classification and prediction of treatment outcome. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 13, 380–391. doi:10.1002/cpp.503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GagnéP. (2006). Mean and covariance structure mixture models. In HancockG. R.MuellerR. D. (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 197–224). : Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• HatfieldD.OglesB. M. (2004). The use of outcome measures by psychologists in clinical practice. Professional Psychology: Research & Practice, 35, 485–491. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.35.5.485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HessT. R.RohlfingJ. E.HardyA. O.Glidden-TraceyC.TraceyT. J. G. (2010). An examination of the “interpersonalness” of the Outcome Questionnaire. Assessment, 17, 396–399. doi:10.1177/1073191110369761
   Google Scholar
• HorowitzL. M.AldenL. E.WigginsJ. S.PincusA. L. (2000). Inventory of Interpersonal Problems manual. : Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• KimS. H.BeretvasS. N.SherryA. R. (2010). A validation of the factor structure of OQ-45 scores using factor mixture modeling. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 42, 275–295. doi:10.1177/0748175609354616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LambertM. J.BurlingameG. M.UmphressV.HansenN. B.VermeerschD. A.ClouseG. C.YancharS. C. (1996). The reliability and validity of the Outcome Questionnaire. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 3, 249–258. 10.1002/1099-0879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LambertM. J.GregersenA. T.BurlingameG. M. (2004). The Outcome Questionnaire. In MaruishM. E. (Ed.), The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcome assessment: Vol. 3. Instruments for adults (3rd ed., pp. 191–234). : Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• LambertM. J.HansenN. B.UmpressV.LunnenK.OkiishiJ.BurlingameG. M. (1996). Administration and scoring manual for the OQ-45.2. : Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• LambertM. J.LunnenK.UmphressV.HansenN. B.BurlingameG. M. (1994). Administration and scoring manual for the Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45.1). : Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• LubkeG. H.MuthénB. O. (2005). Investigating population heterogeneity with factor mixture models. Psychological Methods, 10, 21–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LubkeG. H.MuthénB. O. (2007). Performance of factor mixture models as a function of model size, covariate effects, and class-specific parameters. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 26–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MarshH. W.HauK.GraysonD. (2005). Goodness of fit in structural equation models. In Maydeu-OlivaresA.McArdleJ. J. (Eds.), Contemporary psychometrics: A festschrift for Roderick P. McDonald (pp. 275–340). : Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• MeredithW. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor-analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–543. doi:10.1007/BF02294825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MillsapR. E. (2011). Statistical approaches to measurement invariance. : Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• MillsapR. E.Yun-TeinJ. (2004). Assessing factorial invariance in ordered-categorical measures. Journal of Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 479–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MuellerR. M.LambertM. J.BurlingameG. M. (1998). Construct validity of the Outcome Questionnaire: A confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 70, 248–262. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa7002_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998–2012). Mplus Version 7. : Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• NylundK. L.AsparouhovT.MuthénB. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling. A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 535–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OkiishiJ. C.LambertM. J.EggettD.NielsenL.DaytonD. D.VermeerschD. A. (2006). An analysis of therapist treatment effects: Toward providing feedback to individual therapists on their clients’ psychotherapy outcome Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62, 1157–1172. doi:10.1002/jclp.20272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SassD. A. (2011). Testing measurement invariance and comparing latent factor means within a confirmatory factor analysis framework. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29, 347–363. doi:10.1177/0734282911406661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VermeerschD. A.WhippleJ. L.LambertM. J.HawkinsE. J.BurchfieldC. M.OkiishiJ. C. (2004). Outcome Questionnaire: Is it sensitive to changes in counseling center clients? Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 38–49. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.51.1.38
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar