Exploring the Gender Digital Divide in Jordan

References

• Abu-Shanab, E. (2012). Digital government adoption in Jordan: An environmental model. The International Arab Journal of e-Technology (IAJeT), 2 (3), 129–135.
   Google Scholar
• Abu-Shanab, E. (2013a). Electronic government, a tool for good governance and better service. A book published by the author (deposit number: 2013/2/355, call number: 658.4038).
   Google Scholar
• Abu-Shanab, E. (2013b). Income divide: A determinant of technology acceptance. TheInternational Arab Journal of e-Technology (IAJeT), 3 (2), 121–127.
   Google Scholar
• AL-Rababah, B., & Abu-Shanab, E. (2010). E-government and gender digital divide: The case of Jordan. International Journal of Electronic Business Management (IJEBM), 8 (1), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Rababah, B., & Abu-Shanab, E. (2011). Reengineering e-government projects: Gender digital divide perspective—The case of Jordan. The 5th International Conference on Information Technology, May 12-13,2011, Amman/Jordan.
   Google Scholar
• Alsaleh, I., & Rashad, S. (2012). Measuring digital divide in King Abdulaziz University. Problems of Management in the 21st Century, 3 (2012), 8–19.
   Google Scholar
• Alshehri, M., Drew, D., & Alfarraj, O. (2012). A comprehensive analysis of e-government services adoption in Saudi Arabia: Obstacles and challenges. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 3 (2), 1-6.
   Google Scholar
• Bansode, S., & Patil, S. (2011). Bridging digital divide in India: Some initiatives. Asia Pacific Journal of Library and Information Science, /(1), 58–68.
   Google Scholar
• Basu, S. (2004). E-government and developing countries: An overview. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 18 (1), 109–132.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatnagar, S. (2004). E-government from vision to implementation: A practical guide with case studies. New Delhi: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Brännström, I. (2012). Gender and digital divide 2000-2008 in two low-income economies in sub-Saharan Africa: Kenya and Somalia in official statistics. Government Information Quarterly, 29 (1), 60–67.
   Google Scholar
• Compeau, D., & Higgins, C.A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19 (2), 189–211.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, J. (2006). The digital divide: The special case of gender. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22 (5), 320–334.
   Google Scholar
• Enoch, Y., & Soker, Z. (2006). Age, gender, ethnicity and the digital divide: University students’ use of web-based instruction. Open Learning, 21 (2), 99–110.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, D., & Yen, D. (2006). E-government: Evolving relationship of citizens and government, domestic, and international development. Government Information quarterly, 23 (2), 207–235.
   Google Scholar
• Eynon, R. (2009). Mapping the digital divide in Britain: Implications for learning and education. Learning Media and Technology, 34 (4), 277–290.
   Google Scholar
• Gargallo-Castel, A., Esteban-Salvador, L., & Pérez-Sanz, J. (2010). Impact of gender in adopting and using ICTs in Spain. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 5 (3), 120–128.
   Google Scholar
• Geana, M., & Greiner, A. (2011). Health information and the digital divide. Journal of Management & Marketing in Healthcare, 4 (2), 108–112.
   Google Scholar
• Harb, Y, & Abu-Shanab, E. (2009). The impact of e-government on rural areas: The case of Jordan. A conceptual paper presented at the Proceedings of the 3rd Mosharaka International Conference on Communications, Computers and Applications, Amman, Jordan, October 26-28, pp. 1-6.
   Google Scholar
• Helbig, N., Gil-Garcia, R., & Ferro, E. (2009). Understanding the complexity of electronic government: Implications from the digital divide literature. Government Information Quarterly, 26 (1), 89–97.
   Google Scholar
• Hermana, B., & Silfianti, W. (2011). Evaluating e-government implementation by local government: Digital divide in Internet-based public services in Indonesia. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2 (3), 156–163.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, W., Hood, D., & Yoo, S. (2013). Gender divide and acceptance of collaborative Web 2.0 applications for learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 16 (1), 57–65.
   Google Scholar
• Ilomäki, L. (2011). Does gender have a role in ICT among Finnish teachers and students? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 55 (3), 325–340.
   Google Scholar
• Kirmani, M., Davis, M., & Kalyanpur, M. (2009). Young children surfing: Gender differences in computer use. Dimensions of Early Childhood, 37 (2), 16–23.
   Google Scholar
• Lamani, P., & Honakeri, P. (2012). Problems and prospect ofwomen empowerment in India. Indian Streams Research Journal, 2(7) 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). Developing fully functional e-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 18 (2), 122–136.
   Google Scholar
• Lepadatu, G. (2013). Reaching critical mass for implementing the public electronic services measuring the digital divide. Metalurgia International, 18 (1), 90–94.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, K., & Meier, E.B. (2011). Different but similar: Computer use patterns between young Korean males and females. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59 (4), 575–592.
   Google Scholar
• Minguez, A.M. (2005). New technologies as social fact: Gender and digital divide in Spain in compared perspective. Proceedings of the international symposium on Women and ICT: Creating global transformation CWIT ‘05 ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 1-6.
   Google Scholar
• Ono, H., & Zavodny, M. (2007). Digital inequality: A five country comparison using Micro data. Social Science Research, 36 (3), 1135–1155.
   Google Scholar
• Orbicom. (2005). From the digital divide to digital opportunities legal deposit—National Library of Canada, 2005. A report published by Orbicom. Retrieved July 2013, from http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/publications/dd/material/index_ict_opp.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Papadopoulou, P., Nikolaidou, M., & Martakos, D. (2010). What is trust in e-government? A proposed typology. In Proceedings of the 43rd IEEE Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, USA, pp. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, S., & Sultana, N. (2012). Empowerment of women for social development (A case study of Shri Mahila Griha Udyog Lijjat Papad, Hyderabad district). Journal of Arts, Science & Commerce, 3 (3), 50–59.
   Google Scholar
• Redsell, M., & Nycyk, M. (2010). Skilling seniors in computers: Community training responses to the digital divide. Working with Older People,14 (2), 38–42.
   Google Scholar
• Seckin, G. (2010). Digital diversity or digital divide: An exploratory research on age, gender, race and income: Characteristics of online health information users. The International Journal of Diversity in Organizations, Communities and Nations, 10 (1), 99–116.
   Google Scholar
• Sparks, C. (2013). What is the “digital divide” and why is it important? Javnost— The Public, 20 (2), 27–46.
   Google Scholar
• Stoilescu, D., & McDougall, D. (2011). Gender digital divide and challenges in undergraduate computer science programs. Canadian Journal of Education/Revue Canadienne de l’éducation, 34 (1), 308–333.
   Google Scholar
• Subramanian, M. (2007). Theory and practice of e-governance in India: A gender’s perspective. ICEGOV ‘07 proceedings of the 1st international conference on theory and practice of electronic governance, December 10-13,2007, India, Digital Library of ACM, pp. 187-195.
   Google Scholar
• Tobola, C. (2010). Left to our own devices: How income, age, and sex affect type and number of electronic devices that individuals use. Journal of the Communication, Speech & Theatre Association of North Dakota, 22(2009/2010), 31–43.
   Google Scholar
• UNDESA. (2012). UN global e-government survey report 2012: E-government for people. Washington: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, UN.
   Google Scholar
• UNDESA. (2014). United Nations e-government survey 2014: E-governmentfor the future we want. Washington: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, UN.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank, (2004). Engendering information & communication technologies challenges & opportunities for gender-equitable development Africa e-government gendering action plan. Washington: WB. Retrieved June 2013, from http://www.epolafrica.org.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2007). The World Bank definitions. Retrieved March 15,2007, from http://www.worldbank.org
   Google Scholar
• Yanqing, G. (2010). E-government: Definition, goals, benefits and risks. International Conference on Management and Service Science (MASS), 24-26 August, 2010, Wuhan, China, pp. 1-4.
   Google Scholar
• Yao, Y, & Okoli, C. (2007). Demographic differences in attitudes toward remote electronic voting systems. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 47 (2), 34–45.
   Google Scholar
• Yildiz, M. (2007). E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward. Government Information Quarterly, 24 (3), 646–665.
   Google Scholar
• Younghoon, C., Mehri, S., Hyerin, K., & Myeong-cheol, P. (2012). Gender digital divide and online participation: A cross-national analysis. 19th ITS Biennial Conference 2012, Bangkok, Thailand, 18-21 November 2012: Moving Forward with Future Technologies: Opening a Platform for All, pp 1-14.
   Google Scholar