Sexual Harassment: A Complex Adaptive System Viewpoint

References

• Amick, N.J., & Sorenson, R.C. (2004). Factors influencing women’ s perceptions of a sexually hostile workplace. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 4(3-4), 49–69.
   Google Scholar
• Antecol, H., & Cobb-Clark, D. (2003). Does sexual harassment training change attitudes? A view from the federal level. Social Science Quarterly,84(4), 826–842.
   Google Scholar
• Askun, D., & Ataca, B. (2007). Sexuality related attitudes and behaviors of Turkish University students. Behavioral Science, 36 (5), 741–752.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, D.D., Terpstra, D.E., & Larntz, K. (1990). The influence of individual characteristics and severity of harassing behavior on reactions to sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 22(5-6), 305–325.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2002). Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Moral Education,31(2), 101–119.
   Google Scholar
• Berdahl, J.L. (2007). The sexual harassment of uppity women. Journal of Applied Psychology,92(2), 425–437.
   Google Scholar
• Brescoll, V.L., & Uhlmann, E.L. (2005). Attitudes toward traditional and nontraditional parents. Psychology of Women Quarterly,29(4), 436 ‘MS.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, K.G., & Sitzmann, T. (2011). Training and development. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (vol. 12,469–503). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Chamberlain, L.J., Crowley, M., Tope, D., & Hodson, R. (2008). Sexual harassment in organizational context. Work & Occupants, 35 (3), 262–295.
   Google Scholar
• Chattoe, E. (1996). Why are we simulating anyway? Some answers from economics. In K.G. Troitzsch, U. Mueller, G.N. Gilbert, & J.E. Doran (Eds), Social science microsimulation (pp. 78–104). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Downloaded from gld_sagepubcom at ASIAN INSTITUTE TECHNOLOGY on May 27, 2016
   Google Scholar
• Chiodo, D., Wolfe, D.A., Crooks, C., Hughes, R., & Jaffe, P. (2009). Impact of sexual harassment victimization by peers on subsequent adolescent victimization and adjustment: A longitudinal study. Journal of Adolescent Health,45(3), 246–252.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, S.C. (2006). Portrait in blue: A demographic and behavioral profile of police sexual. Women & Criminal Justice, /8(1-2), 79–106.
   Google Scholar
• Diekman, A.B., Goodfriend, W., & Goodwin, S. (2004). Dynamic stereotypes of power: Perceived change and stability in gender hierarchies. Sex Roles, 50(3/4), 201–215.
   Google Scholar
• DuBois, C.L., Faley, R., & Knapp, D. (2008). Been there done that: The impact of experienced sexual harassment on severity perceptions. Paper presented at Academy of Management Conference, Anaheim, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Fain, T.C., & Anderton, D.L. (1987). Sexual harassment: Organizational context and diffuse status. Sex Roles,17(5-6), 291–311.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, S.S., & Cauffman, E. (1999). Your cheatin’ heart: Attitudes, behaviors, and correlates of betrayal in late adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence,9(3), 227–252.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, L.F., & Shullman, S.L. (1993). Sexual harassment: Aresearch analysis and agenda for the 1990s. Journal of Vocational Behavior,42(1), 5–27.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, L.F., Swan, S., & Fischer, K. (1995). Why didn’t she just report him? The psychological and legal implications of women’s responses to sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues,51(1), 117–138.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, L.F., Swan, S., & Magley, V.J. (1997). But was it really sexual harassment? Legal, behavioral, and psychological definitions of the workplace victimization of women. In W. O’Donohue (Ed.), Sexual harassment: Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 5–28). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, L.E., Drasgow, F., Hulin, C.L., Gelfand, M.J., & Magley, V.J. (1997). Antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: A test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology,82(4), 578–589.
   Google Scholar
• Frederick, S., & Loewenstein, G. (1999). Hedonic adaptation. In E. Diener, N. Schwartz, & D. Kaheman (Eds), Hedonic psychology: Scientific approaches to enjoyment, suffering, and well-being (pp. 302–329). New York: Russell Sage Foundation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gehrke, J., Ramakrishnan, R., & Ganti, V. (2000). Rainforest-A framework for fast decision tree construction of large datasets. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 4(2-3), 127–162.
   Google Scholar
• Gelfand, M.J., Fitzgerald, L.F., & Drasgow, F. (1995). The structure of sexual harassment: A confirmatory analysis across cultures and settings. Journal of Vocational Behavior; 47 (2), 164–177.
   Google Scholar
• Gruber, J. (1998). The impact of male work environments and organizational polices on women’s experiences of sexual harassment. Gender & Society,12(3), 301–320.
   Google Scholar
• Gruber, J. (1998). (2003). Sexual harassment in the public sector. In M. Paludi, & C.A.Paludi, Jr. (Eds), Academic and workplace sexual harassment: A handbook
   Google Scholar
• Downloaded from gld_sagepubcom at ASIAN INSTITUTE TECHNOLOGY on May 27, 2016
   Google Scholar
• of cultural, social science, management, and legal perspectives (pp. 49-75). Westport, CT: Praeger/Greenwood.
   Google Scholar
• Gutek, B.A. (1985). Sex and the workplace: Impact of sexual behavior and harassment on women, men, and organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Hertzog, J.L., Wright, D., & Beat, D. (2008). There’s a policy for that: A comparison of the organizational culture of workplaces reporting incidents of sexual harassment. Behavior and Social Studies,17(2), 169–181.
   Google Scholar
• Hesson-Mcinnis, M.S., & Fitzgerald, L.F. (1997). Sexual harassment: A preliminary test of an integrative model. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27 (10), 877–901.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, G.J. (2005). Culture and organizations: Intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival: Software of the mind (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, J.H. (2006). Studying complex adaptive systems. Journal of Systems Science and Complexity,19(1), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Husbands, R. (1992). Sexual harassment law in employment: An international perspective. International Labor Review,131(6), 535–559.
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, N.R., Sycara, K., & Wooldridge, M. (1998). A roadmap of agent research and development. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems,1(1), 7–38.
   Google Scholar
• Kenjo, Y., Yamada, T., & Terano, T. (2007). Agent-based simulation to analyze business office activities using reinforcement learning. Agent-based approaches in economic and social complex systems V. Post-proceedings of The AESCS International Workshop 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Kleijnen, J.P.C. (1995). Theory and methodology: Verification and validation of simulation models. European Journal of Operational Research,82(1), 145–162.
   Google Scholar
• Knepell, P.L., & Arangno, D.C. (1993). Simulation validation: A confidence assessment methodology. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press. Kutner, M.H., Nachtsheim, C.J., Neter, J., & Li, W. (2005). Applied linear statistical models (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Lafontaine, E., & Tredeau, L. (1986). The frequency, sources, and correlates of sexual harassment among women in traditional male occupations. Sex Roles,15(7-8), 433–442.
   Google Scholar
• Langhout, R.D., Bergman, M.E., Cortina, L.M., Fitzgerald, L.F., Drasgow, F., & Williams, J.H. (2005). Sexual harassment severity: Assessing situational and personal determinants and outcomes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35 (5), 975–1007.
   Google Scholar
• L’Armand, K., Pepitone, A., & Shanmugam, T.E. (1981). Attitudes toward rape: A comparison of the role of chastity in India and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,12(3), 284–303.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S., Gibson, H., & Near, J.P. (2004). Blowing the whistle on sexual harassment: Test of a model of predictors and outcomes. Human Relations, 57 (3), 297–322.
   Google Scholar
• Lengnick-Hall, M.L. (1995). Sexual harassment research: A methodological critique. Personnel Psychology,48(4), 841–864.
   Google Scholar
• Lindgren, K.P., Parkhill, M.R., George, W.H., & Hendershot, C.S. (2008). Gender differences in perceptions of sexual intent: A qualitative review and integration. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32 (4), 423–439.
   Google Scholar
• Lucero, M.A., Middleton, K.L., Finch, W.A., & Valentine, S.R. (2003). An empirical investigation of sexual harassers: Toward a perpetrator typology. Human Relations, 56 (12), 1461–1483.
   Google Scholar
• Lucero, M.A., Allen, R.E., & Middleton, K.L. (2006). Sexual harassers: Behaviors, motives, and change over time. Sex Roles, 55(5-6), 331–343.
   Google Scholar
• Magley, V.J., Waldo, C.R., Drasgow, F., & Fitzgerald, L.F. (1999). The impact of sexual harassment on military personnel: Is it the same for men and women? Military Psychology,11(3), 283-302.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, I.P. (2003). Technology managementA complex adaptive systemsapproach. International Journal of Technology Management,25(8), 728–745.
   Google Scholar
• Ménard, K.S., Hall, G.C.N., Phung, A.H., Ghebrial, M.F.E., & Martin, L. (2003). Gender differences in sexual harassment and coercion in college students: Developmental, individual and situational determinants. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, /8(10), 1222–1239.
   Google Scholar
• Menon, S.A., & Kanekar, S. (1992). Attitudes toward sexual harassment of women in India. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22 (24), 1940–1952.
   Google Scholar
• Murthy, S.K. (1998). Automatic construction of decision trees from data: A multi-disciplinary survey. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2 (4), 345–389.
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary-Kelly, A.M., Duffy, M.K., & Griffin, R.W. (2000). Construct confusion in the study of antisocial work behavior. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management,18. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary-Kelly, A.M., Bowes-Sperry, L., Bates, C.A., & Lean, E.R. (2009). Sexual harassment at work: A decade (plus) of progress. Journal of Management, 35 (3), 503–536.
   Google Scholar
• Ohse, D.M., & Stockdale, M.S. (2008). Age comparisons in workplace sexual harassment perceptions. Sex Roles, 59 (3-4), 240–253.
   Google Scholar
• Ojedokun, A.O., & Balogun, S.K. (2008). Gender differences in premarital sexual permissiveness among university undergraduates. Gender and Behavior, 6 (1), 1651–1672.
   Google Scholar
• Paludi, M.A., & Barickman, R. (1991). Academic and workplace sexual harassment: A resource manual (pp. 61-75). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, E.L., Kulik, C.T., & Schmidtke, J.M. (1998). Individual differences in the effectiveness of sexual harassment awareness training. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,28(8), 698–723.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, E.L., Schmidtke, J.M., & Kulik, C.T. (1998). Propensity to sexually harass: An exploration of gender differences. Sex Roles, 38 (5-6), 443–460.
   Google Scholar
• Pina, A., Gannon, T.A., & Saunders, B. (2009). An overview of the literature on sexual harassment: Perpetrator, theory, and treatment issues. Aggression and Violent Behavior,14(2), 126–138.
   Google Scholar
• Downloaded from gld_sagepubcom at ASIAN INSTITUTE TECHNOLOGY on May 27, 2016
   Google Scholar
• Polhill, J.G. (2009). Agent-based modeling of socio-economic processes related to the environment: Example of land-use change. In P.C. Baveye et al. (Eds), Uncertainties in environmental modeling and consequences for policy making. Place: Springer Science.
   Google Scholar
• Puffer, S., & McCarthy, D. (2011). Two decades of Russian business and management research: An institutional theory perspective. Academy of Management Perspectives,25(2), 21–36.
   Google Scholar
• Reese, L.A., & Lindenberg, K.E. (2005). Gender, age, and sexual harassment Review of Public Personnel Administration,25(4), 325-352.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, J., Perlstadt, H., & Phillips, W.R.F. (1993). Now that we are here: Discrimination, disparagement, and harassment at work and the experience of women lawyers. Gender & Society, 7 (3), 415–433.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, V. (1998). Reconceptualizing sexual harassment. Yale Law Journal,107(6), 1683–1805.
   Google Scholar
• Uggen, C., & Blackstone, A. (2004). Sexual harassment as a gendered expression of power. American Sociological Review,69(1), 64–92.
   Google Scholar
• United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (2014). (U.S. EEOC). Sexual harassment. Retrieved January 10,2014, from http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/types/sexualharassment.cfin
   Google Scholar
• United States Merit Systems Protection Board (USMSPB). (1981). Sexual harassment: Special study. Washington, DC: Office of Merit Systems Review and Studies.
   Google Scholar
• United States Merit Systems Protection Board. (1995). Sexual harassment in the federal workplace-Trends, progress, continued challenges. Washington, DC: Office of Merit Systems Review and Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., Gwebu, K., Shanker, M., & Troutt, M.D. (2009). An application of agent-based simulation to knowledge sharing. Decision Support Systems,46(2), 532–541.
   Google Scholar
• Wasti, S.A., Bergman, M.E., Glomb, T.M., & Drasgow, F. (2000). Test of the cross-cultural generalizability of a model of sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology,85(5), 766–778.
   Google Scholar
• Willness, C.R., Steel, P., & Lee, K. (2007). A meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequences of workplace sexual harassment. Personnel Psychology,60(1), 127–162.
   Google Scholar
• Wilensky, U. (1999). NetLogo. http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/. Center for connected learning and computer-based modeling, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
   Google Scholar