A Five-Step Guide to Conducting SEM Analysis in Counseling Research

References

• Anderson, Anderson, Gerbing, D. W. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychametrika, 49, 155–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, Anderson, Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbuckle, Arbuckle, Wothke, W. (1999). AMOS 4.0 user’s guide. Chicago: SmallWaters.
   Google Scholar
• Bangert, Bangert, Baumberger, J. P. (2005). Research and statistical techniques used in the journal of counseling and development: 1990-2001. Journal of Counseling and Development, 83, 480–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, Baron, Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M. (1989). EQS: A structural equations program manual. Los Angeles, CA: BMDP Statistical Software.
   Google Scholar
• Bentler, Bentler, Chou, C. (1987). Practical issues in structural equation modeling. Sociological Methods and Research, 16, 78–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, Bollen, Long, J. S. (1993). Testing structural equation models. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bullock-Yowell, Bullock-Yowell, Peterson, Peterson, Reardon, Reardon, Leirer, Leirer, Reed, C. A. (2011). Relationships among career and life stress, negative career thoughts, and career decision state: A cognitive information processing perspective. Career Development Quarterly, 59, 302–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, Chan, Lee, Lee, Lee, Lee, Kubota, Kubota, Allen, C. A. (2007). Structural equation modeling in rehabilitation counseling research. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 51, 53–66.
   Google Scholar
• Chao, Chao, Chu-Lien, Chu-Lien, Sanjay, R. (2011). The role of ethnic identity, gender roles, and multicultural training in college counselors’ multicultural counseling competence: A mediation model. Journal of College Counseling, 14, 50–64.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran, Cochran, Wang, Wang, Stevenson, Stevenson, Johnson, Johnson, Crews, C. (2010). Adolescent occupational aspirations: Test of Gottfredson’s theory of circumscription and compromise. Career Development Quarterly, 59, 412–427.
   Google Scholar
• Cooley, W. W. (1978). Explanatory observational studies. Educational Researcher, 7, 9–15.
   Google Scholar
• Costello, Costello, Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 10, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Crockett, S. A. (2011). The role of supervisor-supervisee cultural differences, supervisor multicultural competence, and the supervisory working alliance in supervision outcomes: A moderated mediation model ( Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 3455280).
   Google Scholar
• Henson, Henson, Hull, Hull, Williams, C. (2010). Methodology in our education research culture: Toward a stronger collective quantitative proficiency. Educational Researcher, 39, 229–240. doi:10.2102/0013189X10365102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoelter, J. W. (1983). The analysis of covariance structures: Goodness-of-fit indices. Sociological Methods and Research, 11, 325–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horvath, Horvath, Greenberg, L. S. (1986). The development of the working alliance inventory. In Greenberg, L. S., Pinsof, W. M. (Eds.), The psychotherapeutic process: A research handbook (pp. 529–556). New York, NY: Gilford.
   Google Scholar
• James, James, Mulaik, Mulaik, Brett, J. M. (1982). Causal analysis: Assumptions, models, and data. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, Jöreskog, Sörbom, D. (1993). LISERL 8: Structural equation modeling with SIMPLIS command language. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, Kaplan, Gladding, S. T. (2011). A vision for the future of counseling: The 20/20 principles for unifying and strengthening the profession. Journal of Counseling and Development, 89, 367–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelloway, E. K. (1998). Using liseral for structural equation modeling: A researcher’s guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Ladany, Ladany, Mori, Mori, Mehr, K. E. (2007). Trainee perceptions of effective and ineffective supervision interventions ( Unpublished manuscript). Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh University.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, L. M., Suzuki, Suzuki, Gillespie, Gillespie, Potenza, Potenza, Bechtel, Bechtel, Toulouse, A. L. (1992). Development and validation of the counseling self-estimate inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39, 105–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lent, Lent, Lopez, Lopez, Brown, Brown, Gore, P. A. (1996). Latent structure of the sources of mathematics self-efficacy. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49, 292–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundervold, Lundervold, Belwood, M. F. (2000). The best kept secret in counseling: Single case (N = 1) experimental designs. Journal of Counseling and Development, 78, 92–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCallum, MacCallum, Browne, Browne, Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, Marsh, Balla, Balla, McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens, M. P. (2005). The use of structural equation modeling in counseling psychology research. The Counseling Psychologist, 33, 269–298. doi:10.1177/0011000004272260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, Meyer, Gamst, Gamst, Guarino, A. J. (2006). Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, R. O. (1996). Basic principles of structural equation modeling: An introduction to LISREL and EQS. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mulaik, S. A., James, James, Van Alstine, Van Alstine, Bennett, Bennett, Lindi, Lindi, Stilwell, C. D. (1989). Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychology Bulletin, 105, 430–445. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brian, R. M. (1994). Identification of simple measurement models with multiple latent variables and correlated errors. In Marsden, P. V. (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 137–170). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Quintana, Quintana, Maxwell, S. E. (1999). Implications of recent development in structural equation modeling for counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 27, 485–527. doi:10.1177/0011000099274002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray, D. C., Hull, D. M., Thacker, Thacker, Pace, Pace, Swan, Swan, Carlson, Carlson, Sullivan, J. M. (2011). Research in counseling: A 10-year review to inform practice. Journal of Counseling and Development, 89, 349–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raykov, Raykov, Marcoulides, G. A. (2000). A first course in structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Raykov, Raykov, Widaman, K. F. (1995). Issues in applied structural equation modeling research. Structural Equation Modeling, 2, 289–318. doi:10.1080/10705519509540017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saris, Saris, Satorra, A. (1993). Power evaluations in structural equation models. In Bollen, K. A., Long, J. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 181–204). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schumacker, Schumacker, Lomax, R. G. (2010). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Skosireva, A. K. (2010). Acculturation, alientation, and HIV risk among the Russian-speaking drug users in Estonia ( Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3402554).
   Google Scholar
• Stage, Stage, Carter, Carter, Nora, A. (2004). Path analysis: An introduction and analysis of a decade of research. Journal of Educational Research, 98, 5–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stricker, G. (2002). What is a scientist-practitioner anyway? Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 1277–1283. doi:10.1002/jclp.10111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomarken, Tomarken, Waller, N. G. (2005). Structural equation modeling: Strengths, limitations, and misconceptions. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 31–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tovar, Tovar, Simon, M. (2010). Factorial structure and invariance analysis of the Sense of Belonging Scales. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 43, 199–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villodas, Villodas, Villodas, Villodas, Roesch, S. (2011). Examining the factor structure of the positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS) in a multiethnic sample of adolescents. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 44, 193–203. doi:10.1177/0748175611414721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar