592
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

An Integrated Approach to Risk Assessments and Condition Surveys

Pages 127-141 | Published online: 29 Nov 2013

REFERENCES

  • Ashley-Smith, J. 1997. Risk analysis. In The interface between science and conservation, ed. S. Bradley. British Museum occasional paper 116. London: British Museum Press. 123–32.
  • Ashley-Smith, J. 1999. Risk assessment for object conservation. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
  • Ashley-Smith, J. 2000. Developing professional uncertainty. In Tradition and innovation: Advances in conservation, ed. A. Roy and P. Smith. London: International Institute for the Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works. 14–17.
  • Best, J. B. 1995. Cognitive psychology. 4th ed. Minneapolis: West.
  • Bradley, S., and D. Thickett. 1999. The pollution problem in perspective. ICOM Committee for Conservation preprints. 12th Triennial Meeting, Lyons. London: ICOM. 1:8–13.
  • Chalmers, A. E. 1999. What is this thing called science? 3rd ed. Milton Keynes, U.K.; Open University Press.
  • Crumly, C. R. 1984. Saving a legacy: Natural history collections in Germany before and after World War II. Curator 27(3) :205–19.
  • Dunbar, K. 1993. Concept discovery in a scientific domain. Cognitive Science 17(3):397–434.
  • Eden, P., N. Dungworth., N. Bell, and G Matthews. 1998. A model for assessing preservation needs in libraries. British Library Research and Innovation Report 125. London: British Library.
  • Edwards, D., and W Murray. 2002:. Condition assessment tooimanual for using the condition assessment too (CAT) database. Scottish Museums Council, Edinburgh UK.
  • Erhardt, D., and M. Mecklenburg. 1994. Relative humidity rc-examined. In Preventive conservation: Practice, theory and research. Preprints of the Congress on Preventive Conservation: Practice, Theory and Research, Ottawa. London: International Institute for the Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works. 31–38.
  • Evans, J. St. B.T. 1989. Bias in human reasoning: Causes and consequences. Hove, Sussex, U.K.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Eysenck, M. W, and M. T. Keane. 2000. Cognitive psychology: A student’s handbook. 4th ed. Hove, Sussex, U.K.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Fenn J. 1995. The cellulose nitrate Using sulphonephthalein indicators to evaluate storage strategies. In From marble to chocolate: The conservation of modern sculpture. London: Archetype. 87–92.
  • Gibson, J. J. 1974. Perception of the visual world. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.
  • Gibson, J. J. 1979. The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Gordon, I. E, 1989. Theories of visual perception. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K.: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Gregory, R. L. 1972. Visual illusions. In New horizons in psychology, Vol. 1, ed. B. M. Foss. Harmondsworth, Middlesex, U.K.: Penguin.
  • Gregory, R, L. 1974. Concepts and mechanisms of perception. London: Duckworth.
  • Gregory, R. L. 1998. Eye and brain: The psychology of seeing. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Gross, R. D. 2001. Psychology: The science of mind and behaviour. 5th ed. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
  • Grzywacz, C.M., and N. Tennent. 1994. Pollution monitoring in storage and display cabinets: Carbonyl pollutant levels in relation to artefact deterioration. Preprints of the Congress on Preventive Conservation: Practice Theory and Research, Ottawa. London: International Institute for the Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works. 165–70.
  • Johnsen, J. S. 1994. Surveying large collections of photographs for archival survival. Preprints of the Congress on Preventive Conservation: Practice, Theory and Research Ottawa. London: International Institute for the Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works. 202–6.
  • Johnsen, J. S. 1999. Introduction to the surveyors guide to condition assessment of photographic collections. ICOM Committee for Conservation preprints. 12th Triennial Meeting, Lyons. London: ICOM. 2:555–60.
  • Johnsen, J. S., and K. Bonde-Johansen. 2002. Condition survey and preservation strategies at the Danish Film Archive. ICOM Committee for Conservation preprints. 13th Triennial Meeting, Rio de Janeiro. London: ICOM. 2:644–50.
  • Juien S. 2001. Challenging mould problems: Case studies in historic houses. Poster presented at the FUNGI: A Threat for People and Cultural Heritage Through Micro-organisms conference, Munich, Germany.
  • Keene, S. 1991. Audits of care: A framework for collections condition surveys. In Storage, ed. M. Norman and V. Todd. London: United Kingdom Institute for Conservation. 6–16.
  • Keene, S. 1994. Real-time survival rates for treatments of archaeological iron. Ancient and historic metals: Conservation and scientific research, ed. D. A. Scott, et al. Santa Monica: GCI. 249–64.
  • Keene, S. 2002. Managing conservation in museums. 2nd ed. London: Butterworths Heinmann.
  • Koestler, R. J., P. Brimblecombe, D. Camuffo, T. E. Ginell, P. Leavengood, J. Petushkova, M. Steiger, C. Urzi, V Verges-Belmin, and T. Warscheid. 1994. How do external environmental factors accelerate change? In Durability and change: The science, responsibility and cost of sustaining cultural heritage, ed. W E. Krumbein, et al. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K.: John Wiley and Sons. 149–63.
  • Marcon, P. 1997. Decision support models for preventive conservation. In The interface between science and conservation, ed. S. Bradley. British Museum occasional paper 116. London: British Museum Press. 143–51.
  • Marr, D. 1982. Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. New York: Freeman.
  • Michalski, S. 1990. An overall framework for preventive conservation and remedial conservation. ICOM Committee for Conservation preprints. 9th Triennial Meeting, Dresden. London: ICOM. 2:589–91.
  • Michalski, S. 1994. A systematic approach to preservation: Description and integration with other museum activities. Preprints of the Congress on Preventive Conservation: Practice, Theory and Research, Ottawa. London: International Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works. 8–11.
  • Neisser, U. 1968. The processes of vision. Scientific American 219(3):204–14.
  • Neisser, U. 1976. Cognition and reality: Principles and implications of cognitive psychology. San Francisco: Freeman.
  • Newey, H. M., S. M. Bradley, and M. N. Leese. 1993. Assessing the condition of archaeological iron: An intercomparison. ICOM Committee for Conservation preprints. 10th Triennial Meeting, Washington. London: ICOM. 2:786–91.
  • Oaksford, M., and N. Chater. 1998. Rationality in an uncertain world: Essays on the cognitive science of human reasoning. Hove, Sussex, U.K.: Psychology Press.
  • Padfield, T. 1994. The role of standards and guidelines: Are they a substitute for understanding the problem or a protection against the consequences of ignorance? In Durability and change: The science, responsibility and cost of sustaining cultural heritage, ed. W. E. Krumbein, et al. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K.: John Wiley and Sons. 191–99.
  • Purewal, V.J. 1997. An investigation into the composition of botanical wax models with a view to their conservation. Collection Forum 13:11–19.
  • Resnick, M. 1994. Termites, turtles and traffic jams: Explorations in massively parallel microworlds. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  • Taylor, J., and S. Stevenson. 1999. Investigating subjectivity within collection condition surveys. fournal for Museums Management and Curatorship 18(1):19–42.
  • Taylor, J., and D. Watkinson. 2003. Using multiple hypotheses in collection condition surveys. Conservator 27:13–22.
  • Thomson, G. 1986. The museum environment. 2nd ed. London: Butterworths.
  • Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185:1124–31.
  • Van der Reyden, D., H. Tennison, and F.W Tsai. 1996. Publish then perish: The reclamation of a collection of scientific illustrations. Restaurator 17(2): 104–15.
  • Van Oosten, T. B. 2002. A survey of problems with “early” plastics. In Contributions to conservation, ed. J. A. Mosk and N. Tennent. London: James and James. 87–96.
  • Waller, R. 1994. Conservation risk assessment: A strategy for managing resources for preventive conservation. Preprints of the Congress on Preventive Conservation: Practice, Theory and Research, Ottawa. London: International Institute for the Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works. 12–16.
  • Waller, R. 1999. Internal pollutants, risk assessment and conservation priorities. ICOM Committee for Conservation preprints. 12th Triennial Meeting, Lyons. London: ICOM. 1:113–18.
  • Waller, R. 2002. A risk model for collection preservation. ICOM Committee for Conservation preprints. 13th Triennial Meeting, Rio de Janeiro. London: ICOM. 1:102–7.
  • Waller, R. 2003. Cultural property risk analysis model: Development and application to preventive conservation at the Canadian Museum of Nature. PhD diss., University of Göteborg, Sweden.
  • Wason, P. C. 1960. On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly fournal of Experimental Psychology 12(3): 129–40.
  • Wason, P. C. 1996. Foreword. In Rationality and reasoning, J. St. B. T. Evans and D. Over. Hove, Sussex, U.K.: Psychology Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.