Illuminating Activities at Paleo Crossing (33ME274) Through Microwear Analysis

References

• Bamforth Douglas 1988 Investigating Microwear Polishes with Blind Tests: The Institute Results in Context. Journal of Archaeological Science 15: 11–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamforth Douglas, Burns George, Woodman Craig 1990 Ambiguous Use Traces and Blind Test Results: New Data. Journal of Archaeological Science 17: 413–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brose David S. 1994 Archaeological Investigations at the Paleo Crossing Site: a Paleoindian Occupation in Medina County, Ohio. In The First Discovery of America, edited by , Dancey William S., pp. 61–76. The Ohio Archaeological Council, Columbus.
   Google Scholar
• Brush Nigel, Yerkes Richard W. 1996 Microwear Analysis of Chipped Stone Tools from the Martins Creek Mastodon Site, Holmes County, Ohio. Current Research in the Pleistocene 13: 55–57.
   Google Scholar
• Bryan A.L. 1991 The Fluted-Point Tradition in the Americas ― One of Several Adaptations to Late Pleistocene American Environments. In Clovis: Origins and Adaptations, edited by , Bonnichsen R., Tunmire K.L., pp. 15–33. Center for the Study of the First Americans, Corvallis, Oregon.
   Google Scholar
• Collins Michael 1999 Clovis Blade Technology: A Comparative Study of the Keven Davis Cache, Texas. University of Texas Press, Austin.
   Google Scholar
• Dinnis R., Pawlick A., Gaillard C. 2009 Bladelet Cores as Weapon Tips? Hafting Residue Identification and Microwear of Three Carinated Burins from the Late Aurignacian of Les Vachons, France. Journal of Archaeological Science 39: 1922–1934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis Christopher, Tomenchuk Jon, Holland John D. 2003 Typology, Use, and Sourcing of the Late Pleistocene Lithic Artifacts from the Hiscock Site. In The Hiscock Site: Late Pleistocene and Holocene Paleoecology and Archaeology of Western New York State, edited by , Laub Richard S., pp. 221–237. Buffalo Society of Natural Sciences, Buffalo.
   Google Scholar
• Eren Metin I. 2006 The Paleo Crossing (33-ME-274) Non-Projectile Point Biface Assemblage. Current Research in the Pleistocene 23: 95–97.
   Google Scholar
• Eren Metin I. 2010 Anvil Reduction at the Early Paleoindian Site of Paleo Crossing (33ME274), Northeast Ohio. Current Research in the Pleistocene 27: 75–77.
   Google Scholar
• Eren Metin I., Redmond Brian 2011 Clovis Blades at Paleo Crossing (33ME274), Medina County, Ohio. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 36: 173–194.
   Google Scholar
• Eren Metin I., Redmond Brian, Kollecker Mark 2004 The Paleo Crossing (33-ME-274) Fluted Point Assemblage. Current Research in the Pleistocene 21: 38–39.
   Google Scholar
• Eren Metin I., Redmond Brian, Kollecker Mark 2005 Unifacial Stone Tool Analyses from the Paleo Crossing Site (33-ME-274), Ohio. Current Research in the Pleistocene 22: 43–45.
   Google Scholar
• Eren Metin I., Chao Anne, Hwang Wen-Han, Colwell Robert K. 2012 Estimating the Richness of a Population when the Maximum Number of Classes is Fixed: a Non-Parametric Solution to an Archaeological Problem. PLoS ONE 7(5): e34179. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0034179.
   Google Scholar
• Gero Joan 1995 Railroading Epistemology: Paleoindians and Women. In Interpreting Archaeology, edited by , Hodder Ian, pp. 175–180. Routledge, New York.
   Google Scholar
• van Gijn Anne Louise 1990 The Wear and Tear of Flint: Principles of Microwear Analysis Applied to Dutch Neolithic Assemblages. Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia 22, University of Leiden, Leiden, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Haynes Gary 2002 The Early Settlement of North America. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Juel Jensen Helle 1988 Functional Analysis of Prehistoric Flint Tools by High-Power Microscopy: A Review of the West European Research. Journal of World Prehistory 2: 53–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay Marvin 1996 Microwear Analysis of Some Clovis and Experimental Chipped Stone Tools. In Stone Tools: Theoretical Insights into Human Prehistory, edited by , Odell George H., pp. 315–344. Plenum, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Kay Marvin 1999 Microscopic Attributes of the Keven Davis Blades. In Clovis Blade Technology, edited by , Collins Michael, pp. 126–144. University of Texas Press, Austin.
   Google Scholar
• Keeley Lawrence H. 1980 Experimental Determination of Stone Tool Use. A Micro-Wear Analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly Robert 1995 The Foraging Spectrum: Diversity in Hunter-Gatherer Lifeways. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly Robert, Todd Lawrence 1988 Coming into the Country: Early Paleoindian Hunting and Mobility. American Antiquity 53: 231–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longo Laura, Skakun Natalia 2008 “Prehistoric Technology”40 Years Later: Functional Studies and the Russian Legacy. BAR International Series S1783, Oxbow, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Martin Paul S. 1984 Prehistoric Overkill: The Global Model. In Quaternary Extinctions, edited by , Martin P.S., Klein R.G., pp. 354–403. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.
   Google Scholar
• Minchak Scott A., Dickens William A., Pevny Charlotte D., Waters Michael R. 2011 Usewear Analysis of Clovis Artifacts. In Clovis Technology at the Gault Site in Texas, edited by , Waters Michael R., Pevny Charlotte D., Carlson David L., pp. 135–151. Texas A&M University Press, College Station.
   Google Scholar
• Meltzer David 1993 Is There a Clovis Adaptation? In From Kostenki to Clovis: Upper Paleolithic Paleoindian Adaptations, edited by , Soffer O., Praslov N.D., pp. 293–310. Plenum Press, NewYork.
   Google Scholar
• Miller G. Logan 2010 Ohio Hopewell Ceremonial Bladelet Use at the Moorehead Circle, Fort Ancient. Unpublished Masters Thesis, Department of Anthropology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan Brooke M., Eren Metin I., Khreisheh Nada, Hill Genevieve, Bradley Bruce In Press. Clovis Bipolar Lithic Reduction at Paleo Crossing, Ohio: a Reinterpretation Based on the Examination of Experimental Replications. In Clovis: Current Perspectives on Technology, Chronology, and Adaptations, edited by , Jennings Thomas, Smallwood Ashley. Texas A&M Press, College Station, Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Morrow Juliet 1996 The Organization of Paleoindian Lithic Technology in the Confluence Area of the Mississippi, Illinois, and Missouri Rivers. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Washington University, St. Louis.
   Google Scholar
• Rots Veerle 2010 Prehension and Hafting Traces on Flint Tools: A Methodology. Leuven University Press, Leuven, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Seeman Mark, Nilsson Nils, Summers Garry, Morris Larry, Barans Paul, Dowd Elaine, Newman Margaret 2008 Evaluating Protein Residues on Gainey Phase Paleoindian Stone Tools. Journal of Archaeological Science 35: 2742–2750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semenov Sergei 1964 Prehistoric Technology. Translated by , Thompson M.W.. Barnes and Noble, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Shoberg Marilyn 2010 Functional Analysis of Stone Tools. In Clovis Technology, edited by , Bradley Bruce, Collins Michael, Hemmings Andrew, pp. 138–156. Archaeology Series 17. International Monographs in Prehistory, Ann Arbor.
   Google Scholar
• Shott Michael J. 1993 The Leavitt Site: A Parkhill Phase Paleo-Indian Occupation in Central Michigan. Memoirs of the University of Michigan Museum of Anthropology, No. 25, Ann Arbor.
   Google Scholar
• Simons Donald B. 1997 The Gainey and Butler Sites as Focal Points for Caribou and People. In Caribou and Reindeer Hunters of the Northern Hemisphere, edited by , Jackson L., Thacker P., pp. 105–131. Avebury, Aldershot.
   Google Scholar
• Stork Peter L., Tomenchuk John 1990 An Early Paleoindian Cache of Informal Tools at the Udora Site, Ontario. Research in Economic Anthropology 5: 45–93.
   Google Scholar
• Tankersley Kenneth B. 1998 Variation in the Early Paleoindian Economies of Late Pleistocene Eastern North America. American Antiquity 63: 7–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tankersley Kenneth B., Holland J.D. 1994 Lithic Procurement Patterns at the Paleo Crossing Site, Medina County, Ohio. Current Research in the Pleistocene 11: 61–63.
   Google Scholar
• Tomenchuk Jon 1997 A Parametric Use-Wear Study of Artifacts from Areas C and C-east. In The Fisher Site: Archaeological, Geological and Paleobotanical Studies at an Early Paleo-Indian Site in Southern Ontario, Canada, edited by , Stork Peter L., pp. 95–162. Memoirs of the Museum of Anthropoloy, University of Michigan, No. 30, Ann Arbor.
   Google Scholar
• Tomenchuk Jon, Stork Peter 1997 Two Newly Recognized Paleoindian Tool Types: Single- and Double-Scribe Compass Gravers and Coring Gravers. American Antiquity 62: 508–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan Patrick 1985 Use-Wear Analysis of Flaked Stone Tools. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waguespack Nicole, Surovell Todd 2003 Clovis Hunting Strategies, or How to Make Out on Plentiful Resources. American Antiquity 68: 333–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yerkes Richard W. 1983 Microwear, Microdrills, and Mississippian Craft Specialization. American Antiquity 48: 499–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yerkes Richard W. 1990 Using Microwear Analysis to Investigate Domestic Activities and Craft Specialization at the Murphy Site, a Small Hopewell Settlement in Licking County, Ohio. In The Interpretive Possibilities of Microwear Analysis, edited by , Gräslund B., Knutson H., Knutson K., Taffinder J., pp. 167–176. Societas Archaeologica Upsaliensis, Aun 14, Uppsala, Sweeden.
   Google Scholar
• Yerkes Richard W., Kardulias P. Nick 1993 Recent Developments in the Analysis of Lithic Artifacts. Journal of Archaeological Research 1: 89–119.
   Google Scholar