Incorporating Gender and Sex Dimensions in Medical Research

Bibliography

• Kamran Abbasi. 2011. The dawn of revolutionary medicine. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 104: 1, doi 10·1258/jrsm.2010·10k075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry. 2007. Guidelines for Phase 1 clinical trials. ABPI. http://www.abpi.org.uk/%2Fpublications%2Fpdfs%2Fphase1_guidelines.pdf (13/02/2011)
   Google Scholar
• Peter Baker. 2001. The international men’s health movement has grown to the stage that it can start to influence international bodies. British Medical Journal 323: 1014–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Becker Jill B, Arnold Arthur P, Berkley Karen J, Blaustein Jeffrey D, Eckel Lisa A, Hampson Elizabeth, Herman James P, Marts Sherry, Sadee Wolfgang, Steiner Meir, Taylor Jane, Young Elizabeth. 2005. Strategies and methods for research on sex differences in brain and behavior. Endocrinology 146(4): 1650–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amy Downing, Rudge Gavin, Cheng Yaping, Tu Yu-Kang, Keen Justin, Gilthorpe Mark S. 2007. Do the UK government’s new Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) scores adequately measure primary care performance? A cross-sectional survey of routine health care data. BMC Health Services Research 7: 166.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Du Lina, Bayir Hülya, Lai Yichen, Zhang Xiaopeng, Kochanek Patrick M, Watkins Simon C, Graham Steven H, Clark Robert S. 2004. Innate gender-based proclivity in response to cytotoxicity and programmed cell death pathway. Journal of Biological Chemistry 279(37): 38563–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards Fred H, Ferraris Victor A, Shahian David M, Peterson Eric, Furnary Anthony P, Haan Constance K, Bridges Charles R. 2005. Gender-specific practice guidelines for coronary artery bypass surgery: perioperative management. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 79: 2189–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Medicines Agency, 2005. ICH gender considerations in the conduct of clinical trials. EMEA/CHMP/3916/2005. http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/includes/document/document_detail.jsp?webContentId=WC500059887&murl=menus/document_library/document_library.jsp&mid=W C0b01ac058009a3dc. (13/02/2011)
   Google Scholar
• Eyding Dirk, Lelgemann Monika, Grouven Ulrich, Härter Martin, Kromp Mandy, Kaiser Thomas, Kerekes Michaela F, Gerken Martin, Wieseler Beate. 2010. Reboxetine for acute treatment of major depression: systematic review and meta-analysis of published and unpublished placebo and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor controlled trials. British Medical Journal 341: c4737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher Jill A, Ronald Lorna M. 2010. Sex, gender, and pharmaceutical politics: from drug development to marketing. Gender Medicine 7(4): 357–70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fowler Robert A, Sabur Natasha, Li Ping, Juurlink David N, Pinto Ruxandra, Hladunewich Michelle A, Adhikari NeillK J, Sibbald William J, Maritin Claudio M. 2007. Sex- and age-based differences in the delivery and outcomes of critical care. Canadian Medical Association Journal 177(12): 1513–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler Robert A, Filate Woganee, Hartleib Michael, Frodt David W, Lazongas Chris, Hladunewich Michelle. 2009. Sex and critical illness. Current Opinion in Critical Care 15: 442–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• genSET. 2010. Recommendations for action on the gender dimension in science. Consensus report produced by a panel of 14 European science leaders as part of the FP7 SiS funded genSET project. http://www. genderinscience.org/downloads/genSET_Consensus_Report_Recommendations_for_Action_on_the_Gender_Dimension_in_Science.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Greenspan Joel D, RebeccaCraft M, LeResche Linda, Arendt-Nielsen Lars, Berkley Karen J, Fillingim Roger B, Gold Michael S, Holdcroft Anita, Lautenbacher Stefan, Mayer Emeran A, Mogil Jeffrey S, Murphy Anne Z, Traub Richard J, and the Consensus Working Group of the Sex, Gender and Pain SIG of the IASP. 2007. Studying sex and gender differences in pain and analgesia: A consensus report. Pain 132: S26–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trish Groves. 2010. Evidence debased medicine. British Medical Journal 340: 786.
   Google Scholar
• Gerd Gigerenzer, Wegwarth Odette, Markus Markus Feufel. 2010. Misleading communication of risk. British Medical Journal 341: c4830.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• GoldsmithMegan R, Bankhead Clare R, Austoker Joan. 2007. Synthesising quantitative and qualitative research in evidence-based patient information. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 61: 262–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greyson Devon L, Becu Annelies RE, Morgan Steven G. 2010. Sex, drugs and gender roles: mapping the use of sex and gender based analysis in pharmaceutical policy research. International Journal for Equity in Health 9: 26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sandra Harding. 1995. ‘Strong Objectivity’: a response to the new objectivity question. Synthese 104: 331–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Health Canada. 1997. Inclusion of women in clinical trials. Therapeutic products programme guidelines. http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/dhp-mps/prodpharma/applic-demande/guide-ld/clini/womct_femec-eng.php. (13/02/2011)
   Google Scholar
• Holdcroft Anita, Berkley Karen J. 2006. Sex and gender differences in pain and its relief. In the 5th Edition of the Wall and Melzack’s Textbook of Pain, ed. , McMahon S, Koltzenburg M, Chapter 75, 1181–97. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
   Google Scholar
• Holdcroft Anita. 2007a. Gender bias in research: how does it affect evidence based medicine? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 100: 2–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holdcroft Anita. 2007b. Integrating the dimensions of sex and gender into basic life sciences research: Methodologic and ethical issues. Gender Medicine 4(Suppl B): S64–S74.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson Joy I, Greaves Lorraine, Repta Robin. 2009. Better science with sex and gender: facilitating the use of a sex and gender-based analysis in health research. International Journal for Equity in Health 8: 14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keuken Debby G, Haafkens Joke A, Hellema Marian J, Burgers Jako S, Moerman Clara J. 2007. Incorporating a gender perspective into the development of clinical guidelines: a training course for guideline developers. Implementation Science 2: 25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim Alison M, Tingen Candace M, Woodruff Teresa K. 2010. Sex bias in trials and treatment must end. Nature 465: 688–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim Hyungsuk, Clark David, Dionner Raymond A. 2009. Genetic contributions to clinical pain and analgesia: avoiding pitfalls in genetic research. Journal of Pain 7: 663–93.
   Google Scholar
• Ineke Klinge. 2007. Bringing gender expertise to biomedical and health-related research. Gender Medicine, 4(Suppl B): S59–S63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elizabeth Loder, Godlee Fiona. 2010. Missing clinical trial data: setting the record straight. Urgent action is needed to restore the integrity of the medical evidence base. British Medical Journal 34: c5641.
   Google Scholar
• McAlister Finlay A, van Diepen Sean, Padwal Rajdeep S, Johnson Jeffrey A, Majumdar Sumit R. 2007. How evidence-based are the recommendations in evidence-based guidelines? PLoS Med 4(8): e250.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kenichi Nakajima, Okuda Koichi, Kawano Masaya, Matsuo Shinro, Slomka Piots, Germano Guido, Kinuya Seigo. 2009. The importance of population-specific normal database for quantification of myocardial ischemia: comparison between Japanese 360 and 180-degree databases and a US database. Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 16(3): 422–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institutes of Health 1994. Department of Health and Human Services NIH guidelines on the inclusion of women and minorities as subjects in clinical research. Bethesda, MD: NIH. http://grants. nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not94-100.html. (13/02/2011)
   Google Scholar
• Nichols Francine H. 2000. History of the Women’s Health Movement in the twentieth century. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing 29: 56–64.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pankevich Diana E, Wizemann Theresa, Altevogt (rapporteurs) Bruce M. 2011. Sex differences and implications for translational neuroscience research. Workshop Summary, Institute of Medicine. Washington DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pilote Louise, Dasgupta Kaberu, Guru Veena, Humphries Karin H, McGrath Jennifer, Norris Colleen, Rabi Doreen, Tremblay Johanne, Alamian Arsham, Barnett Tracie, Cox Jafna, Ghali William A, Grace Sherry, Hamet Pavel, Ho Teresa, Kirkland Susan, Lambert Marie, Libersan Danielle, O’Loughlin Jennifer, Paradis Gilles, Petrovich Milan, Tagalakis Vicky. 2007. A comprehensive view of sex-specific issues related to cardiovascular disease. Canadian Medical Association Journal 176(6): S1–44.
   Google Scholar
• Rosalind Raine, Goldfrad Caroline, Kathy Rowan, Black Nick. 2002. Influence of patient gender on admission to intensive care. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 56: 418–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochon Paula A, Clark Jocalyn P, Binns Malcolm A, Patel Vishal, Gurwitz Jerry H. 1998. Reporting of gender-related information in clinical trials of drug therapy for myocardial infarction. Canadian Medical Association Journal 159: 321–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sackett David L, Rosenberg William MC, Gray Muir JA, Haynes Brian R, Richardson Scott W. 1996. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. British Medical Journal 312: 71–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiebinger Londa. 2010. Gender, science and technology. United Nations Division for the Advancement of Women and the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation. EGM/ST/2010/BP, 1 October 2010, Paris, France. http://www.stanford.edu/group/gender/cgi-bin/wordpressblog/2010/10/londa-schiebinger-keynotes-un-conference-on-gender-science-and-technology. (13/02/2011)
   Google Scholar
• Saowarat Snidvongs, Holdcroft Anita. 2010. How women respond to analgesics. MIMS Women’s Health 5(3): 37–9.
   Google Scholar
• Wijchers Patrick J, Yandim Cihangir, Panousopoulou Eleni, Ahmed Mushfika, Harker Nicky, Saveliev Alexander, Burgoyne PaulS, Festenstein Richard. 2009. Sexual dimorphism in mammalian autosomal gene regulation is determined not only by Sry but by sex chromosome compliment as well. Developmental Cell 14(19): 477–84.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. 2009. Women and health. Today’s evidence tomorrow’s agenda. http://whqlibdoc. who.int/publications/2009/9789241563857_eng.pdf (22/01/2011)
   Google Scholar