When Natural met Social: A Review of Collaboration between the Natural and Social Sciences

Bibliography

• Agbayani RF, Baticados DB, Siar SB. 2000. Community fishery resourcesmanagement on Malalison Island, Philippines: R & D framework, interventions,and policy implications. Coastal Management 28(1): 19–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnason R. 2009. Fisheries management andoperations research. European Journal of OperationalResearch 193(3): 741–751. Doi:10.1016/J.Ejor.2007.07.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker GH, Little RG. 2006. Enhancing homeland security:Development of a course on critical infrastructure systems. Journalof Homeland Security and Emergency Management 3(4): 15. Doi:4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry A, Born G, Weszkalnys G. 2008. Logics of interdisciplinarity. Economyand Society 37(1): 20–49. Doi:10.1080/03085140701760841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bawa KS, Kress WJ, Nadkarni NM. 2004. Beyond paradise —Meeting the challenges in tropical biology in the 21st century. Biotropica 36(3): 276–84. Doi: 10.1646/Q1609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergsma Nynke, Fischer ArnoutRH, Van Asselt ED, Zwietering MarcelH, De Jong AariekeEI. 2007. Consumer food preparationand its implication for survival of Campylobacter jejunion chicken. British Food Journal 109(7): 548–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackstock KL, Kirk EA, Reeves AD. 2005. Sociology, science andsustainability: Developing relationships in Scotland. SociologicalResearch Online 10(2): 28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blevis E, Stolterman E. 2009. Transcending disciplinaryboundaries in interaction design. Interactions 16(5): 48–51.
   Google Scholar
• Borrego M, Newswander LK. 2008. Characteristics of successfulcross-disciplinary engineering education collaborations. Journalof Engineering Education 97(2): 123–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bybee RodgerW. 2010. What is stem education? Science 329(5995): 996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceci SJ, Williams WM. 2003. The Cornell Institute forResearch on Children: A vision of integrated developmental science. Journalof Applied Developmental Psychology 24(6): 681–96. Doi:10.1016/J.Appdev.2003.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifford NJ. 2008. Models in geography revisited. Geoforum 39(2): 675–86. Doi: 10.1016/J.Geoforum.2007.01.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Committee on FacilitatingInterdisciplinary Research and Committee on Science Engineering and PublicPolicy. 2004. Facilitating interdisciplinaryresearch. Washington, DC: TheNational Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Czech B. 2002. A transdisciplinary approachto conservation land acquisition. Conservation Biology 16(6): 1488–97. Doi: 10·1046/J.1523-1739·2002·01046.X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Boer Ymkje, De Gier Alice, Verschuur Marije, De Wit Bert. 2006. Building bridges: Researcherson their experience with interdisciplinary research in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Rmno, Knaw, Nwo & Cso.
   Google Scholar
• Evely AC, Fazey I, Pinard M, Lambin X. 2008. The influence of philosophicalperspectives in integrative research: A conservation case study in the CairngormsNational Park. Ecology and Society 13(2): article52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairweather P. 1994. An interview with Dosamantes,Irma. American Journal of Dance Therapy 16(1): 13–19. Doi: 10.1007/Bf02359238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fife-Schaw Chris, Rowe Gene. 2000. Extending the applicationof the psychometric approach for assessing public perceptions of food risks:Some methodological considerations. Journal of RiskResearch 3(2): 167–79.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer ArnoutRH, De Jong AEI, De Jonge R, Frewer LJ, Nauta MJ. 2005. Improving food safety inthe domestic environment: The need for a transdisciplinary approach. RiskAnalysis 25(3): 503–17. Doi:10·1111/J.1539-6924·2005·00618.X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer ArnoutRH, Frewer LynnJ, Nauta MaartenJ. 2006. Towards improving foodsafety in the domestic environment: A multi-item Rasch scale for the measurementof the safety efficacy of domestic food handling practices. RiskAnalysis 26(5): 1323–38.
   Google Scholar
• Forsyth Timothy. 1998. Mountain myths revisited:Integrating natural and social environmental science. MountainResearch and Development 18(2): 107–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis CA. 1994. Practical applicationsof agricultural systems research in temperate countries. Journalof Production Agriculture 7(1): 151–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frischknecht PM. 2000. Environmental science educationat the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (Eth). WaterScience and Technology 41(2): 31–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller T, Moran P. 2001. Small enterprises as complexadaptive systems: A methodological question? Entrepreneurshipand Regional Development 13(1): 47–63. Doi:10.1080/089856201750046801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giller KE, Leeuwis C, Andersson JA, Andriesse W, Brouwer A, Frost P, Hebinck P, Heitkonig I, Van Ittersum MK, Koning N, Ruben R, Slingerland M, Udo H, Veldkamp T, Van De Vijver C, Van Wijk MT, Windmeijer P. 2008. Competing claims on naturalresources: What role for science? Ecology and Society 13(2): article34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond GP. 2004. Towards sustainability:Energy efficiency, thermodynamic analysis, and the ‘two cultures’. EnergyPolicy 32(16): 1789–98. Doi:10.1016/J.Enpol.2003.09.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen J, Holm L, Frewer LJ, Robinson P, Sandoe P. 2003. Beyond the knowledge deficit:Recent research into lay and expert attitudes to food risks. Appetite 41(2): 111–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartshorn J, Maher M, Crooks J, Stahl R, Bond Z. 2005. Creative destruction: Buildingtoward sustainability. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 32 (1): 170–80. Doi: 10.1139/L04-119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks CC, Fitzsimmons C, Polunin NVC. 2010. Interdisciplinarity inthe environmental sciences: Barriers and frontiers. EnvironmentalConservation 37(4): 464–77. Doi:10.1017/S0376892910000822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson SK, Robinson JG. 1990. Training the new conservationist —Cross-disciplinary education in the 1990s. EnvironmentalConservation 17(4): 319–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen I, Nygren A, Gamberale F, Goldie I, Westerholm P, Jonsson E. 1995. The role of the psychologistin multidisciplinary treatments for chronic neck and shoulder pain —A controlled cost-effectiveness study. ScandinavianJournal of Rehabilitation Medicine 27(1): 19–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluge T, Liehr S, Lux A, Moser P, Niemann S, Umlauf N, Urban W. 2008. IWRM concept for the CuvelaiBasin in northern Namibia. Physics and Chemistry ofthe Earth 33(1–2): 48–55. Doi:10.1016/J.Pce.2007.04.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn TS. 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lattuca LisaR. 2003. Creating interdisciplinarity:Grounded definitions from college and university faculty. Historyof Intellectual Culture 3(1): 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Le Coze JC. 2005. Are organisations too complexto be integrated in technical risk assessment and current safety auditing? SafetyScience 43(8): 613–38. Doi:10.1016/J.Ssci.2005.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leahey E, Reikowsky RC. 2008. Research specializationand collaboration patterns in sociology. Social Studiesof Science 38(3): 425–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu S, Costanza R, Farber S, Troy A. 2010. Valuing ecosystem servicestheory, practice, and the need for a transdisciplinary synthesis. In Ecologicaleconomics reviews, ed. , Limburg K, Costanza R, ed, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1185: 54–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machlis GE. 1992. The contribution of sociologyto biodiversity research and management. BiologicalConservation 62(3): 161–70. Doi:10.1016/0006-3207(92)91044-S.
   Google Scholar
• Martinelli A, Meyer M, Von Tunzelmann N. 2008. Becoming an entrepreneurialuniversity? A case study of knowledge exchange relationships and faculty attitudesin a medium-sized, research-oriented university. Journalof Technology Transfer 33(3): 259–83. Doi:10.1007/S10961-007-9031-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason WA, Conrey FR, Smith ER. 2007. Situating social influenceprocesses: Dynamic, multidirectional flows of influence within social networks. Personalityand Social Psychology Review 11(3): 279–300. Doi:10.1177/1088868307301032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medd W, Chappells H. 2007. Drought, demand and thescale of resilience: challenges for interdisciplinarity in practice. InterdisciplinaryScience Reviews 32(3): 233–48. Doi:10.1179/030801807x211748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller RB. 1994. Interactions and collaborationin global change across the social and natural-sciences. Ambio 23(1): 19–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nauta MJ, Fischer ArnoutRH, Van Asselt ED, De Jong AariekeEI, Frewer LynnJ, De Jonge Rob. 2008. Food safety in the domesticenvironment: The effect of consumer risk information on human disease risks. RiskAnalysis 28(1): 179–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newing H. 2010. Interdisciplinary trainingin environmental conservation: Definitions, progress and future directions. EnvironmentalConservation 37(4): 410–18. Doi:10.1017/S0376892910000743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowotny H, Scott P, Gibbons M. 2003. Introduction: ‘Mode2’ revisited: The new production of knowledge. Minerva 41(3): 179–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peereboom JWC, Bouwer K. 1993. Environmental science milieukundein the Netherlands — A review. Science of theTotal Environment 129(1–2): 157–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillipson Jeremy, Lowe Philip. 2008. Towards sustainable foodchains: Harnessing the social and natural sciences. Trendsin Food Science & Technology 19(5): 224–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers Y, Scaife M, Rizzo A. 2005. Interdisciplinarity: Anemergent or engineered process? In Interdisciplinarycollaboration: An emerging cognitive science, ed. , Derry S, Schunn C D, Gernsbacher M A, ed, 265–86. Mahwah,New Jersey: LEA.
   Google Scholar
• Ronteltap Amber, Van Trijp JCM, Renes RJ, Frewer LJ. 2007. Consumer acceptance oftechnology-based food innovations: Lessons for the future of nutrigenomics. Appetite 49(1): 1–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronteltap Amber, Fischer ArnoutRH, Tobi Hilde. 2011. Societal response of technologies —Converging technologies — Converging societal response approaches? Journalof Nanoparticle Research, 13(10): 4399–410. DOI:10.1007/s11051-011-0473-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scialfa C, Pichora-Fuller K, Spadafora P. 2004. Interdisciplinary researcheducation in communication and social interaction among healthy older adults. EducationalGerontology 30(9): 733–50. Doi:10.1080/03601270490498007.
   Google Scholar
• Simon HA. 1970. The sciences of the artificial,Karl Taylor Compton Lectures;E196. Cambridge, Ma: MITPress.
   Google Scholar
• Spelt EJH, Biemans HJA, Tobi H, Luning PA, Mulder M. 2009. Teaching and learning ininterdisciplinary higher education: A systematic review. EducationalPsychology Review 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Strang V. 2009. Integrating the socialand natural sciences in environmental research: A discussion paper. Environment,Development and Sustainability 11(1): 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson KM, Deisler PF, Schwing RC. 2005. Interdisciplinary vision:The first 25 years of the society for risk analysis (SRA), 1980–2005. RiskAnalysis 25(6): 1333–86. Doi:10·1111/J.1539-6924·2005·00702.X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinyakova E. 2007. Fieldwork: Man in the systemof nature and priority of natural laws in human life. CollegiumAntropologicum 31(2): 601–12.
   Google Scholar
• Veldkamp A, Van Altvorst AC, Eweg R, Jacobsen E, Van Kleef A, Van Latesteijn H, Mager S, Mommaas H, Smeets PJAM, Spaans L, Van Trijp JCM. 2009. Triggering transitionstowards sustainable development of the Dutch agricultural sector: Transforum’sapproach. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 29(1): 87–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh WB, Smith GL, London M. 1975. Developing an interfacebetween engineering and social-sciences — Interdisciplinary team-approachto solving societal problems. American Psychologist 30(11): 1067–71. Doi: 10.1037/0003-066x.30.11.1067.
   Google Scholar
• Wickens ChristopherD, Hollands JustinG. 2000. Engineering psychology and humanperformance. 3rd ed. Upper SadleRiver, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Winchester JW. 1992. Helping students understandglobal change. ACS Symposium Series 483: 460–6.
   Google Scholar