Ecosystem Management Research: Clarifying the Concept of Interdisciplinary Work

Bibliography

• Ascher W. 1999. Resolving the hidden differences among perspectives on sustainable development. Policy Sciences 32 (4): 351–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bammer G. 2005. Integration and Implementation Sciences: Building a New Specialization. Ecology and Society 10 (2): [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss2/art6/.
   Google Scholar
• Barry A., Born G., Weszkalnys G.. 2008. Logics of Interdisciplinarity. Economy and Society 37 (1): 20–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkes F., Colding J., Folke C., eds. 2003. Navigating social-ecological systems building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs R., Westley F.R., Carpenter S.R.. 2010. Navigating the Back Loop: Fostering Social Innovation and Transformation in Ecosystem Management. Ecology & Society 15 (2): 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Blockstein DE. 1999. Integrated Science for Ecosystem Management: An Achievable Imperative. Conservation Biology 13 (3): 682–685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boon H., Verhoef M., O’hara D., Findlay B.. 2004. From Parallel Practice to Integrative Health Care: A Conceptual Framework. BMC Health Services Research 4:15. [online] URL: http://www.biomedcentral. com/1472-6963/4/15.
   Google Scholar
• Bruce A., Lyall C., Tait J., Williams R.. 2004. Interdisciplinary Integration in Europe: the Case of the Fifth Framework Programme. Futures 36 (4): 457–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunner RD. 2006. A Paradigm for Practice. Policy Sciences 39 (2): 135–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunner RD, Clark T.W. 1997. A Practice-Based Approach to Ecosystem Management. Conservation Biology 11 (1): 48–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunner R, Steelman T.. 2005. Beyond scientific management. In Adaptive Governance: Integrating Science, Policy and Decision Making, edited by R. Brunner, T. Steelman, L. Coe-Juell, C. Cromley, C. Edwards and D. Tucker. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Callicott JB. 2000. Aldo Leopold and the Foundations of Ecosystem Management. Journal of Forestry 98 (5): 5–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell LM. 2005. Overcoming Obstacles to Interdisciplinary Research. Conservation Biology 19 (2): 574–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers R, ed. 1983. Rural development putting the last first. London, New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen NL, Bartuska A.M, Brown J.H, Carpenter S., Dantonio C., Francis R., Franklin J.F, Macmahon J.A, Noss R.F, Parsons D.J, Peterson C.H, Turner M.G, Woodmansee R.G. 1996. The Report of the Ecological Society of America Committee on the Scientific Basis for Ecosystem Management. Ecological Applications 6 (3): 665–691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark TW. 1999. Interdisciplinary problem-solving: Next steps in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Policy Sciences 32 (4): 393–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark TW. 2002. The policy process a practical guide for natural resource professionals. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark T W, Stevenson M J, Ziegelmayer K, Rutherford M B, eds. 2001. Species and ecosystem conservation: An interdisciplinary approach, Bulletin Series Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Number 105). New Haven: Yale University.
   Google Scholar
• Clark WC, Dickson N.M. 2003. Sustainability Science: the Emerging Research Program. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100 (14): 8059–8061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortner H, Moote M A, eds. 1999. The politics of ecosystem management. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• di Castri F., Hadley M.. 1985. Enhancing the Credibility of Ecology: Is Interdisciplinary Research for Land Use Planning Useful? GeoJournal 13 (4): 299–325.
   Google Scholar
• Evely AC, Fazey I., Pinard M., Lambin X.. 2008. The Influence of Philosophical Perspectives in Integrative Research: a Conservation Case Study in the Cairngorms National. Ecology and Society 13 (2):[online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art52/.
   Google Scholar
• Everitt B, Landau S, Leese M, eds. 2001. Cluster analysis. 4th ed. London, New York: Arnold. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Folke C. 2004. Traditional Knowledge in Social-Ecological Systems. Ecology and Society 9 (3):[online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss3/art7/.
   Google Scholar
• Funtowicz SO, Ravetz J.R. 1994. Uncertainty, Complexity and Post-Normal Science. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 13 (12): 1881–1885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallopin GC, Funtowicz S., O’Connor M., Ravetz J.. 2001. Science for the twenty-first century: from social contract to the scientific core. International Social Science Journal 53 (168): 219–229.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P, Trow M, eds. 1994. The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. 1st ed. London; Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gray B. 1989. Collaborating: Finding Common Ground for Multiparty Problems. 1st ed, Jossey-Bass Management Series. Jossey-Bass Social and Behavioral Science Series). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gray G J, Enzer M J, Kusel J , eds. 2001. Understanding community-based forest ecosystem management. Binghamton: Food Products Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grumbine RE. 1994. What Is Ecosystem Management. Conservation Biology 8 (1): 27–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grumbine RE. 2002. Reflections on ‘What is Ecosystem Management’. Conservation Biology 11 (1): 41–47.
   Google Scholar
• Hair J F, Anderson R E, Tatham R L, eds. 1987. Multivariate data analysis with readings. 2nd ed. New York, London: Macmillan Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Hanssen L, Rouwette E., Van Katwijk M.M. 2009. The Role of Ecological Science in Environmental Policy Making: From a Pacification Toward a Facilitation Strategy. Ecology and Society 14 (1):[online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art43/.
   Google Scholar
• Heberlein TA. 1988. Improving Interdisciplinary Research — Integrating the Social and Natural- Sciences. Society & Natural Resources 1 (1): 5–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heemskerk M, Wilson K., Pavao-Zuckerman M.. 2003. Conceptual Models as Tools for Communication Across Disciplines. Conservation Ecology 7 (3): [online] URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol7/iss3/art8/.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch Hadorn G, ed. 2008. Handbook of transdisciplinary research. Dordrecht, London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsen CH, Hels T., McLaughlin W.J.. 2004. Barriers and facilitators to integration among scientists in transdisciplinary landscape analyses: A cross-country comparison. Forest Policy and Economics 6 (1): 15–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssens W, ed. 2008. Marketing research with SPSS. Harlow, England, New York: Prentice Hall/Financial Times.
   Google Scholar
• Jantsch E. 1972. Towards interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in education and innovation. In Interdisciplinarity: problems of teaching and research in universities, edited by L. Apostel, G. Berger, A. Briggs and G. Michaud. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff S, ed. 2004. States of knowledge the co-production of science and social order, International library of sociology: International library of sociology). London, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kandiko CB, Blackmore P.. 2008. Institutionalising Interdisciplinary Work in Australia and the UK. Journal of Institutional Research 14 (1): 87–95.
   Google Scholar
• Kastenhofer K, Bechtold U., Wilfing H.. 2011. Sustaining sustainability science: The role of established inter-disciplines. Ecological Economics 70 (4): 835–843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kates RW, Clark W.C, Corell R., Hall J.M, Jaeger C.C, Lowe I., Mccarthy J.J, Schellnhuber H.J, Bolin B., Dickson N.M, Faucheux S., Gallopin G.C, Grubler A, Huntley B., Jager J., Jodha N.S, Kasperson R.E, Mabogunje A., Matson P., Mooney H., Moore B., O’Riordan T., Svedin U.. 2001. Environment and Development — Sustainability Science. Science 292 (5517): 641–642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keen M, V A Brown, R Dyball, eds. 2005. Social learning in environmental management towards a sustainable future. London, Sterling: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy JJ. 1991. Integrating Gender Diverse and Interdisciplinary Professionals Into Traditional United-States-Department-of-Agriculture-Forest-Service Culture. Society & Natural Resources 4 (2): 165–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keough HL, Blahna D.J. 2006. Achieving Integrative, Collaborative Ecosystem Management. Conservation Biology 20 (5): 1373–1382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khagram S, Nicholas K.A, Bever D.M, Warren J., Richards E.H, Oleson K., Kitzes J., Katz R., Hwang R., Goldman R., Funk J., Brauman K.A. 2010. Thinking about knowing: conceptual foundations for interdisciplinary environmental research. Environmental Conservation 37 (4): 388–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein JT. 2008. Evaluation of Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Research — a Literature Review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 35 (2): S116–S123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein JT. 1990. Interdisciplinarity: history, theory, and practice. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knight R L, Bates S F, eds. 1995. A new century for natural resources management. Washington, D.C: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kockelmans JJ. 1979. Why interdisciplinarity? In Interdisciplinarity and higher education, edited by J. J. Kockelmans. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lattuca L R, ed. 2001. Creating interdisciplinarity interdisciplinary research and teaching among college and university faculty. Edited by Vanderbilt Issues in Higher Education. 1st ed. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee KN. 1993. Compass and gyroscope integrating science and politics for the environment. Washington, D.C: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lele S, Norgaard R.B. 2005. Practicing Interdisciplinarity. Bioscience 55 (11): 967–975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long J S, ed. 1997. Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables, Advanced Quantitative Techniques in the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lowe P, Whitman G, Phillipson J.. 2009. Ecology and the Social Sciences. Journal of Applied Ecology 46 (2): 297–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund V, Coleman G., Gunnarsson S., Appleby M.C, Karkinen K.. 2006. Animal welfare science. — Working at the interface between the natural and social sciences. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 97 (1): 37–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacMynowski DP. 2007. Pausing at the Brink of Interdisciplinarity: Power and Knowledge at the Meeting of Social and Biophysical Science. Ecology and Society 12 (1): [online] URL: http://www. ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art20/.
   Google Scholar
• Malone CR. 2000. Ecosystem Management Policies in State Government of the Usa. Landscape and Urban Planning 48 (1–2):57–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Max-Neef MA. 2005. Foundations of Transdisciplinarity. Ecological Economics 53 (1): 5–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell JA. 2010. Using Numbers in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Inquiry 16 (6): 475–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCallin A. 2001. Interdisciplinary practice: a matter of teamwork: an integrated literature review. Journal of Clinical Nursing 10 (4): 419–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meffe G K, Nielsen L A, Knight R L, Schenborn D A, eds. 2002. Ecosystem management adaptive, community-based conservation. Washington, D.C: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mehl-Madrona L. 2009. What Traditional Indigenous Elders Say About Cross-Cultural Mental Health Training. Explore-the Journal of Science and Healing 5 (1): 20–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meinke H, Nelson R, Kokic P., Stone R., Selvaraju R., Baethgen W.. 2006. Actionable climate knowledge: From analysis to synthesis. Climate Research 33 (1): 101–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore D S, ed. 1995. The basic practice of statistics. New York: W.H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Moran J, ed. 2002. Interdisciplinarity, The new critical idiom: New critical idiom). London, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moss MR. 2000. Interdisciplinarity, Landscape Ecology and the ‘transformation of Agricultural Landscapes’. Landscape Ecology 15 (3): 303–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naiman RJ. 1999. A Perspective on Interdisciplinary Science. Ecosystems 2 (4): 292–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell WH. 2007. Decision-making in interdisciplinary studies. In Handbook of decision-making, edited by G. Morcol. New York: Marcel Dekker.
   Google Scholar
• Noss RF, Cooperrider A.. 1994. Saving nature’s legacy protecting and restoring biodiversity. Washington, D.C: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nyhus PJ, Westley F.R, Lacy R.C, Miller P.S. 2002. A Role for Natural Resource Social Science in Biodiversity Risk Assessment. Society & Natural Resources 15 (10): 923–932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickett STA, Burch W.R, Grove J.M. 1999. Interdisciplinary Research: Maintaining the Constructive Impulse in a Culture of Criticism. Ecosystems 2 (4): 302–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickett S T, Kolasa J, Jones C G, eds. 2007. Ecological understanding. The nature of theory and the theory of nature. 2nd ed. Amsterdam, Boston: Elsevier/Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pirot J-Y, Meynell P-J, Elder D.. 2001. Ecosystem Management: lessons from around the world — a guide for development and conservation practitioners. Cambridge: IUCN.
   Google Scholar
• Pujadas Botey A. 2010. Interdisciplinarity in Ecosystem Management. PhD, Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Pujadas Botey A, Garvin T.. 2010. Interdisciplinary research in ecosystem management. A literature evaluation. The International Journal of Science in Society 1 (4): 185–213.
   Google Scholar
• Redclift M. 1998. Dances With Wolves? Interdisciplinary Research on the Global Environment. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions 8 (3): 177–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Repko AF. 2011. Interdisciplinary: Research process and theory. Second ed. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Rip A. 1997. A Cognitive Approach to Relevance of Science. Social Science Information Sur Les Sciences Sociales 36 (4): 615–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romesburg H C, ed. 1990. Cluster analysis for researchers. Malabar: Robert E. Krieger Pub. Co.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenfield PL. 1992. The Potential of Transdisciplinary Research for Sustaining and Extending Linkages Between the Health and Social-Sciences. Social Science & Medicine 35 (11): 1343–1357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter L, Hearn A M V, eds. 1996. Outside the lines issues in interdisciplinary research. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slocombe DS. 1998. Lessons From Experience With Ecosystem-Based Management. Landscape and Urban Planning 40 (1–3): 31–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steel B, List P., Lach D., Shindler B.. 2004. The Role of Scientists in the Environmental Policy Process: a Case Study From the American West. Environmental Science & Policy 7 (1): 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su C, Fu B., Wei Y., Lu Y., Liu G., Wang D., Mao K., Feng X.. 2012. Ecosystem management based on ecosystem services and human activities: a case study of the Yanhe watershed. Sustainability Science 7 (1): 17–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szostak R. 2002. Intuition and Interdisciplinarity: A Reply to Mackey. Issues in Integrative Studies 20: 131–137.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick BG. 2007. Logistic regression. In Using multivariate statistics, edited by B. G. Tabachnick and L. S. Fidell. Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Tress G, Tress B., Fry G.. 2004. Clarifying Integrative Research Concepts in Landscape Ecology. Landscape Ecology 20 (4): 479–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van De Ven A.H., P.EJohnson. 2006. Knowledge for Theory and Practice. Academy of Management Review 31 (4): 802–821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Kerkhoff L. 2005. Integrated Research: Concepts of Connection in Environmental Science and Policy. Environmental Science & Policy 8 (5): 452–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vittinghoff E, ed. 2005. Regression methods in biostatistics linear, logistic, survival, and repeated measures models, Statistics for Biology and Health). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Walters C J, ed. 2001. Adaptive management of renewable resources. Caldwell: Blackburn Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ward JH. 1963. Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function. Journal of the American Statistical Association 58 (301): 236–&.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wear DN. 1999. Challenges to Interdisciplinary Discourse. Ecosystems 2 (4): 299–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westley F R, Miller P S, eds. 2003. Experiments in consilience uniting science and social process to save endangered species. Washington, D.C: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson EO. 1998. Integrated science and the coming century of the environment. Science 279 (5359): 2048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winder N. 2003. Successes and problems when conducting interdisciplinary or transdisciplinary (= integrative) research. In Potential and Limitations of Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Landscape Studies. Delta Series 2, edited by B. Tress, G. Tress, A. an der Valk and G. Fry. Wageningen: Alterra Green World Research and Wageningen University.
   Google Scholar
• Yaffee SL. 1996. Ecosystem Management in Practice: the Importance of Human Institutions. Ecological Applications 6 (3): 724–727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaffee SL. 1999. Three Faces of Ecosystem Management. Conservation Biology 13 (4): 713–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar