‘The Heavens are Telling’: Memetic– Calvinian Readings of a Haydn Chord Progression

Bibliography

• Aunger Robert. 2000. Darwinizing Culture: The Status of Memetics as a Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bent IanD, Pople Anthony. 2001. Analysis. In The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians, edited by , Sadie S, Tyrrell J. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Blackmore SusanJ. 1999. The Meme Machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blackmore SusanJ. 2000. The Memes’ Eye view. In Darwinizing Culture: The Status of Memetics as a Science, edited by , Aunger R. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Booth WayneC, Colomb GregoryG, Williams JosephM. 1995. The Craft of Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Calvin WilliamH. 1996. The Cerebral Code: Thinking a Thought in the Mosaics of the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Calvin WilliamH. 1998. Competing for Consciousness: A Darwinian Mechanism at an Appropriate Level of Explanation. Journal of Consciousness Studies 5 (4): 389–404.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen Thomas, ed. 2002. The Cambridge History of Western Music Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohn RichardL. 1997. Neo-Riemannian Operations, Parsimonious Trichords, and their Tonnetz Representations. Journal of Music Theory 41 (1): 1–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conklin Darrell, Anagnostopoulou Christina. 2006. Segmental Pattern Discovery in Music. INFORMS Journal on Computing 18 (3): 285–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook Nicholas. 1998. Music: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cope David. 2003. Computer Analysis of Musical Allusions. Computer Music Journal 27 (1): 11–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawkins Richard. 1983. Universal Darwinism. In Evolution from Molecules to Men, edited by , Bendall D S. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins Richard. 1989. The Selfish Gene. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deliège Irène. 1996. Cue Abstraction as a Component of Categorization Processes in Music Listening. Psychology of Music 24 (2): 131–56.
   Google Scholar
• Dennett DanielC. 1993. Consciousness Explained. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Dennett DanielC. 1995. Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Ferris David. 2000. C. P. E. Bach and the Art of Strange Modulation. Music Theory Spectrum 22 (1): 60–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher RonaldA. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fremantle. 2012. Plinko Game [cited 22 March 2012] Available from http://www.priceisright.com/show/games/plinko.
   Google Scholar
• Gjerdingen RobertO. 1999. An Experimental Music Theory? In Rethinking Music, edited by , Cook N, Everist M. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hebb DonaldO. 1949. The Organization of Behavior: A Neuropsychological Theory. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Jan StevenB. 2004. Meme Hunting with the Humdrum Toolkit: Principles, Problems, and Prospects. Computer Music Journal 28 (4): 68–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jan StevenB. 2007. The Memetics of Music: A Neo-Darwinian View of Musical Structure and Culture. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Jan StevenB. 2010. Memesatz contra Ursatz: Memetic Perspectives on the Aetiology and Evolution of Musical Structure. Musicae Scientiae 14 (1): 3–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jan StevenB. 2011. Music, Memory, and Memes in the Light of Calvinian Neuroscience. Music Theory Online, http://www.mtosmt.org/issues/mto.11·17·2/mto.11·17·2.jan.html.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson DouglasP, Tyson Alan, Winter RobertS. 1985. The Beethoven Sketchbooks: History, Reconstruction, Inventory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kerman Joseph, et al.. 2010. Beethoven, Ludwig van. Grove Music Online.Oxford Music Online, http://www.oxfordmusiconline.com/subscriber/article/grove/music/40026.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer Richard. 1985. The New Modulation of the 1770s: C. P. E. Bach in Theory, Criticism, and Practice. Journal of the American Musicological Society 38 (3): 551–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krumhansl CarolL, Kessler EJ. 1982. Tracing the Dynamic Changes in Perceived Tonal Organization in a Spatial Representation of Musical Keys. Psychological Review 89: 334–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lartillot Olivier, Toiviainen Petri. 2007. Motivic Matching Strategies for Automated Pattern Extraction. Musicae Scientiae Discussion Forum 4A: Similarity Perception in Listening to Music: 281–314.
   Google Scholar
• Leech-Wilkinson Daniel. 2010. Listening and Responding to the Evidence of Early Twentieth-Century Performance. Journal of the Royal Musical Association 135 (Special Issue: Listening: Interdisciplinary Perspectives): 45–62.
   Google Scholar
• Leng Xiaodan, Shaw GordonL. 1991. Toward a Neural Theory of Higher Brain Function Using Music as a Window. Concepts in Neuroscience 2 (2): 229–58.
   Google Scholar
• Leng Xiaodan, Wright EricL, Shaw GordonL. 1990. Coding of Musical Structure and the Trion Model of Cortex. Music Perception 8 (1): 49–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx AdolphB. 1997. Musical Form in the Age of Beethoven. Translated by S.G. Burnham. Edited by S.G. Burnham, Cambridge Studies in Music Theory and Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer LeonardB. 1989. Style and Music: Theory, History, and Ideology. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mikulicz Karl L, ed. 1972. Ein Notierungsbuch von Beethoven aus dem Besitze der Preußischen Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin. Hildesheim and New York: Georg Olms.
   Google Scholar
• Miller GeorgeA. 1956. The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information. Psychological Review 63 (2): 81–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell WilliamJ. 1970. Modulation in C. P. E. Bach's Versuch. In Studies in Eighteenth-Century Music: A Tribute to Karl Geiringer on his Seventieth Birthday, edited by , Landon H C R, Chapman R E. London: George Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Mountcastle VernonB. 1978. An Organizing Principle for Cerebral Function: The Unit Module and the Distributed System. In The Mindful Brain: Cortical Organization and the Group-Selective Theory of Higher Brain Function, edited by , Edelman G M, Mountcastle V B. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Narmour Eugene. 1989. The ‘Genetic Code’ of Melody: Cognitive Structures Generated by the Implication–Realization Model. In Music and the Cognitive Sciences, edited by , McAdams S, Deliège I. London: Harwood.
   Google Scholar
• Narmour Eugene. 1990. The Analysis and Cognition of Basic Melodic Structures: The Implication–Realization Model. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nattiez Jean-Jacques. 1990. Music and Discourse: Toward a Semiology of Music. Translated by C. Abbate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pocklington Richard, Best MichaelL. 1997. Cultural Evolution and Units of Selection in Replicating Text. Journal of Theoretical Biology 188 (1): 79–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popper Karl. 1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Russ Michael. 2007. Some Observations on Pm,n Relations within Set Classes. Music Analysis 26 (1–2): 111–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder Bob. 2000. Music and Memory: An Introduction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tagg Philip. 1999. Introductory Notes to the Semiotics of Music, Version 3. http://www.tagg.org/xpdfs/semiotug.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Temperley David. 2001. The Cognition of Basic Musical Structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Temperley Nicholas. 1991. Haydn: The Creation, Cambridge Music Handbooks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tovey DonaldF. 1981. Essays in Musical Analysis, Vol. 3: Concertos and Choral Works. new ed. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zatorre RobertJ. 2003. Neural Specializations for Tonal Processing. In The Cognitive Neuroscience of Music, edited by , Peretz I, Zatorre R J. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar