LEGISLATION AND REALITY: THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE FOR SANITATION AND HOUSING QUALITY IN URBAN WORKERS’ HOUSING IN THE ANCOATS AREA OF MANCHESTER BETWEEN 1800 AND 1950

Notes and References

• Belford P, ‘The World of the Workshop: Archaeologies of Urban Industrialisation’, in Green A and Leech R (eds), Cities in the World, 1500–2000. Papers Given at the Conference of the Society for Post-Medieval Archaeology April 2002, Society for Post-Medieval Archaeology (Leeds, 2006), 133–49; Connelly, P., T. Kendall, K. Hunter-Mann and A. Mainman, ‘The Archaeology of Modern Urban Poverty’, Current Archaeology, 215 (2008), 26–33; Connelly, P.A., ‘Flush with the Past: an Insight into Late Nineteenth-Century Hungate and its Role in Providing a Better Understanding of Urban Development’, International Journal of Historical Archaeology, 15·4 (2011), 607–16; Jeffries, N., A. Owens, D. Hicks, R. Featherby and K. Wehner, ‘Rematerialising Metropolitan Histories? People, Places and Things in Modern London’, in A. Horning and M. Palmer (eds), Crossing Paths or Sharing Tracks? Future Directions in the Archaeology of Post-1550 Britain and Ireland (London: Boydell & Brewer Ltd, 2009), 323–50; Morton, D., ‘Involving the Public in Glasgow’s Industrial Archaeology: the M74 Dig’, The Archaeologist, 74 (2009), 36–7; Nevell, M., The Industrial Archaeology of the M74, Glasgow, Society of Antiquaries of Scotland (forthcoming); Symonds, J., ‘Dirty Old Town? Industrial Archaeology and the Urban Historic Environment’, Industrial Archaeology Review, 27·1 (2005), 57–65.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil R, ‘Manchester: Symbol or Model for the World?’, in Green and Leech, ref. 2, 151–66; Nevell, M., ‘Living in the Industrial City: Housing Quality, Land Ownership and the Archaeological Evidence from Industrial Manchester, 1740–1850’, International Journal of Historical Archaeology, 15·4 (2011), 594–606; Roberts, J., Working Class Housing in Nineteenth-Century Manchester. St John Street, Irk Town, 1826�–1936 (Radcliffe: Neil Richardson Publications, 2nd edn, 1999).
   Google Scholar
• Nevell, ref. 2; Connelly, ref. 1; Dwyer, E., The Impact of the Railways in the East End 1835–2010. Historical Archaeology from the London Overground East London Line, Museum of London Archaeology, Monograph 52 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Belford P, ‘Urban Industrial Landscapes: Problems of Perception and Protection’, in Barker D and Cranstone D (eds), The Archaeology of Industrialisation. Papers Given at the Archaeology of Industrialisation Conference, October 1999, Society for Post-Medieval Archaeology (Leeds, 2004), 167–9; Nevell, ref. 2. In Manchester the best-known commentators are those by J.P. Kay, The Moral and Physical Condition of the Labouring Classes in Manchester (Manchester, 1832); Engels, F., The Condition of the Working Class in England (London, 1845), and Marr, T.R., Housing Conditions in Manchester and Salford: a Report Prepared for the Citizens’ Association for the Improvement of the Unwholesome Dwellings and Surroundings of the People, with the Aid of the Executive Committee (Manchester: Sherratt & Hughes, 1904).
   Google Scholar
• Though all the properties described in this paper were demolished many years ago, it is still possible to follow in some of the footsteps of the old inhabitants of Ancoats. The paved alleyway access to Hall’s Court, for instance, still survives, as does most of the road pattern throughout northern Ancoats.
   Google Scholar
• Marr, ref. 4, 55.
   Google Scholar
• Farrer W and Brownbill J (eds), The Victoria History of the County of Lancaster, Volume 5 (London: Constable & Co., 1911), 220–30; Kidd, A., Manchester (Edinburgh University Press, 3rd edn, 2002), 62–3; Lloyd-Jones, R. and M. Lewis, ‘Housing Factory Workers’, Manchester Region History Review, 7 (1993), 33; Phillips, C.B and J.H. Smith, A Regional History of England: Lancashire and Cheshire from AD 1540 (London and New York: Longman, 1994); the township had just 1,646 acres and a population of 70,409 in 1801, 142,026 in 1831, and 186,000 in 1851.
   Google Scholar
• Nevell, ref. 2.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts J, ‘A Densely Populated and Unlovely Tract: the Residential Development of Ancoats’, Manchester Region History Review, 7 (1993), 15–26.
   Google Scholar
• Rees R, Poverty and Public Health 1815–1948 (Harlow: Heinemann, 2001), 141–50, 170–4.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, ref. 9, 21.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, ref. 2, 23.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, ref. 9, 24–5.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, ref. 9, 25; Hartwell, C., Pevsner Architectural Guides. Manchester (London: Penguin Books, 2001).
   Google Scholar
• Rose, M. with K. Falconer and J. Holder, Ancoats: the Cradle of Civilisation (Swindon: English Heritage, 2011), 64.
   Google Scholar
• Little S, ‘Ancoats: Protecting the Unprotectable?’, Manchester Region History Review, 7 (1993), 102–3.
   Google Scholar
• Nevell M, ‘From Linen Weaver to Cotton Manufacturer: Manchester During the 17th and 18th Centuries and the Social Archaeology of Industrialisation’, in M. Nevell (ed.), From Farmer to Factory Owner: Models, Methodology & Industrialisation. The Archaeology of the Industrial Revolution in North-West England, CBA North West (Loughborough, 2003), 27–44; Nevell, M., Manchester: the Hidden History (Stroud: History Press, 2008); Miller, I. and C. Wild, A & G Murray and the Cotton Mills of Ancoats Lancaster Imprints 13, Oxford Archaeology North (2007); Rose et al., ref. 15.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, ref. 9, 15.
   Google Scholar
• Nevell, 2008, ref. 17, 152.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd-Jones and Lewis, ref. 7, 34.
   Google Scholar
• Engels, ref. 4.
   Google Scholar
• Kidd A. and Wyke T, The Challenge of Cholera: Proceedings of the Manchester Special Board of Health 1831–1833, Record Society of Lancashire and Cheshire 145 (2010), ix–xv.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, ref. 9, 19.
   Google Scholar
• Marr, ref. 4, 54.
   Google Scholar
• Marr, ref. 4, 56; Roberts, ref. 9, 20.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, ref. 9, 18–19.
   Google Scholar
• The two cellar dwellings at Bradley Street, and the 20 dwellings at Holditchs Court and Shilling Court houses were excavated by Oxford Archaeology North in 2005 and 2007; Miller and Wild, ref. 17, 58–60, and Oxford Archaeology North, ‘Bengal Street Block, Beehive Mills, Ancoats, Manchester: Archaeological Excavation’, unpublished client report, 2007. The Loom Street houses were excavated by the University of Manchester Archaeology Unit in 2007; Gregory, R., ‘Blossom Street, Ancoats, Manchester: an Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment’, University of Manchester Archaeology Unit, unpublished client report, 2006; Gregory, R., ‘Loom Street, Ancoats, Manchester. An Archaeological Excavation of Late 18th and 19th Century Workers’ Housing’, University of Manchester Archaeology Unit, unpublished client report, 2007. A watching brief in 2002 recorded the fragmentary remains of 19th-century housing between Jersey Street and Henry Street. Lloyd, D., ‘Land Bounded by Great Ancoats Street, Redhill Street, Henry Street and Jersey Street, Ancoats, Manchester: An Archaeological Watching Brief’, University of Manchester Archaeology Unit, unpublished client report, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Green’s Plan of Manchester & Salford, published 1794, and the Manchester Pocket Plan map of 1800 (John Rylands University of Manchester Library map collection). This housing was excavated by the Centre for Applied Archaeology, University of Salford; Cattell, S. and M. Nevell, ‘The Workers’ Housing on Vacant Land on the Corner of Pickford Street and Jersey Street: an Archaeological Excavation’, Centre for Applied Archaeology, University of Salford, unpublished client report, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Charles E. Goad Ltd, fire insurance plans of Manchester, 1888 (Chetham’s Library. Manchester).
   Google Scholar
• Cattell and Nevell, ref. 28.
   Google Scholar
• This work was undertaken by the University of Manchester Archaeological Unit. Gregory, 2007, ref. 27; Nevell, 2008, ref. 17.
   Google Scholar
• Another large area of workers’ housing was excavated at Angel Meadow in 2009 by Oxford Archaeology North, although this remains unpublished.
   Google Scholar
• Miller and Wild, ref. 17, 28.
   Google Scholar
• The following maps were consulted in the John Rylands University of Manchester Library map collection: Cole & Roper’s Plan of Manchester & Salford 1807; Johnsons Plan of the Parish of Manchester 1819; Bancks’ Plan of Manchester & Salford 1831; Adsheads Map of Manchester 1851; Goad’s Insurance Plan of Manchester 1888; Ordnance Survey 1:2500 Edition 1894 Lancashire Sheet CIV.7; Ordnance Survey 1:2500 Edition 1908 Lancashire Sheet CIV.7; Ordnance Survey 1:2500 Edition 1922, Lancashire Sheet CIV.7; Ordnance Survey 1:2500 Revision 1931, Lancashire Sheet CIV.7; Ordnance Survey 1:1250 Edition 1948, Plan 33/8498 NE; Ordnance Survey 1:1250 2nd Revision 1963, Plan SJ 8498 NE; Ordnance Survey 1:1250 Edition 1984, Plan SJ 8498 NE; Ordnance Survey 1:1250 Edition 1999, Plan SJ 8498 NE.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, 2006, ref. 27.
   Google Scholar
• These properties are recorded for the first time on Pigot’s Manchester map of 1813 (John Rylands University of Manchester Library map collection), and in the rate books for the following years.
   Google Scholar
• For map references, see ref. 34.
   Google Scholar
• Ordnance Survey 1:2500 1892–4 map series and Marr’s housing quality map published in 1904.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, ref. 9, 22.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, ref. 9, 23.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, ref. 9, 22–4. In other parts of the city new transport facilities were used as an excuse to demolish poor quality housing on the site of Central Station, opened in 1880 and on the site of the Great Northern Railway Warehouse opened in 1896; Brumhead, D., ‘Remaking the City: the Impact of the Railway on Late Victorian Manchester’, Transactions of the Lancashire and Cheshire Antiquarian Society, 100 (2004), 135–58; Nevell, 2008, ref. 17.
   Google Scholar
• The period between the OS 6 inch map published 1894 (sheet 105) and the Manchester Housing Quality Map published in 1904.
   Google Scholar
• Ordnance Survey 1:2500 Series, published in 1965.
   Google Scholar
• The Bradley Street, Holditchs Court and Shilling Court houses were excavated by Oxford Archaeology North in 2005 and 2007, OAN, ref. 27; Miller and Wild, ref. 17, 58–60.
   Google Scholar
• Kidd, ref. 7; Miller and Wild, ref. 17; Nevell, 2008, ref. 17; Roberts, ref. 9.
   Google Scholar
• Aspin C. (ed.), Angus Bethune Reach: Manchester and the Textile Districts in 1849 (reprinted by Helmshore Local History Society, 1972), 6.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, K.J., ‘Familiarity and Contempt: the Archaeology of the Modern’, in Tarlow, S. and S. West (eds), The Familiar Past? Archaeologies of Later Historic Britain (London and New York: Routledge, 1999), 155–79.
   Google Scholar
• Marr, ref. 24, 56.
   Google Scholar
• Connelly, 607–16; Rimmer, J., ‘People and their Buildings in the Working-Class Neighbourhood of Hungate, York’, International Journal of Historical Archaeology, 15 (2011), 617–28.
   Google Scholar
• Giles K and Jones SR, ‘Poverty in Depth: New International Perspectives’, International Journal of Historical Archaeology, 15 (2011), 544–52; Mayne, A., ‘Beyond Metrics: Reappraising York’s Hungate “Slum”’, International Journal of Historical Archaeology, 15 (2011), 553–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar