Taxon delimitation and genetic similarities of the Sphagnum imbricatum complex, as revealed by enzyme electrophoresis

References

• Abramov JJ, Volkova LA. 1998. Opredelitel listostebel 'nych mchov Karelii. Arctoa 7: Suppl. 1: 1–390.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen ST, Aaby B, Odgaard B. 1996. Denmark. In: Berglund BE, Birks HJ, Ralska-Jasiewiczowa M, Wright HE, eds. Palaeoecolo-gical events during the last 15000 years. Chichester: Wiley & Sons, 215–231.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson LE, Amman K. 1991. Cell wall ornamentation in the hyaline cells of Sphagnum. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 69: 49–63.
   Google Scholar
• Andrus R. 1980. Sphagnaceae (Peat Moss Family) of New York State. In: Mitchell RS, ed. Contributions to a flora of New York State. III. New York State Museum Bulletin 442: 1–89.
   Google Scholar
• Andrus R. 1984. Sphagnum austinii from Western North America. Bryologist 87: 334–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrus R. 1987. Nomenclatural changes in Sphagnum imbricatum sensu lato. Bryologist 90: 217–220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aaby B, Jacobsen J. 1979. Changes in biotic conditions and metal deposition in the last millenium as reflected in ombrotrophic peat in Draved Mose, Denmark. DGU Aarbog 1978: 5–43.
   Google Scholar
• Barber KE. 1981. Peat stratigraphy and climatic change. A paleo-ecolo-gical test of the theory of cyclic peat bog regeneration. Rotterdam: Balkema.
   Google Scholar
• Boatman DJ. 1983. The Silver Flowe National Nature Reserve, Galloway, Scotland. Journal of Biogeography 10: 163–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavalli-Sforza LL, Edwards AWF. 1967. Phylogenetic analysis: models and estimation procedures. Evolution 21: 550–570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corley MFV, Crundwell AC. 1991. Additions and amendments to the mosses of Europe and the Azores. Journal of Bryology 16: 337–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford DJ. 1990. Plant molecular systematics. Macromolecular approaches. New York: J. Wiley & Sons Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Cronberg N. 1995. Isozyme electrophoresis in Sphagnum: an analysis of methodology. Lindbergia 20: 40–48.
   Google Scholar
• Cronberg N. 1997. Genotypic differentiation between two related peat-mosses, Sphagnum rubellum and S. capillifolium in Northern Europe. Journal of Bryology 19: 715–729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronberg N. 1998. Population structure and interspecific differentia-tion of the peat moss sister species Sphagnum rubellum and S. capillifolium (Sphagnaceae) in northern Europe. Plant Systematics and Evolution 209: 139–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crum H. 1984. North American Flora. Ser. II Part II. Sphagnopsida. Sphagnaceae . New York: New York Botanical Garden.
   Google Scholar
• Crum H. 1994a. Sphagnaceae In: Allen B, ed. Moss flora of Central America Part I. Sphagnaceae - Calymperaceae. Missouri: Missouri Botanical Garden, 5–24.
   Google Scholar
• Crum H. 1994b. Class Sphagnopsida. In: The moss flora of Mexico. Part I, Sphagnales to Bryales. Memoirs of The New York Botanical Garden 69: 2–21.
   Google Scholar
• Crum H. 1997. A seasoned view of North American Sphagna. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 82: 77–98.
   Google Scholar
• Crum H, Seppelt RD. 1999. Sphagnum leucobryoides reconsidered. Contributions from the University of Michigan Herbarium 22: 29–31.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl E. 1998. The phytogeography of northern Europe: British Isles, Fennoscandia and adjacent areas. Cambridge: Cambridge Univer-sity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels RE, Eddy A. 1990. Handbook of European Sphagna. Second edition. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Dickson JH. 1973. Bryophytes of the Pleistocene. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson P, Lee JA. 1980. Some effects of bisulphite and sulphate on the growth of Sphagnum species in the field. Environmental Pollution Series A 21: 59–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flatberg KI. 1984. A taxonomic revision of the Sphagnum imbricatum complex. Kongelige Norske Videnskabers Selskab Skrifter 3: 1–80.
   Google Scholar
• Flatberg KI. 1986. Taxonomy, morphovariation, distribution and ecology of the Sphagnum imbricatum complex with main reference to Norway. Gunneria 54: 1–118.
   Google Scholar
• Flatberg KI. 1994. Norwegian Sphagna. A field colour guide. Univer-sitetet i Trondheim, Vitenskapsmuseet Rapport Botanisk Serie 3: 1–42.
   Google Scholar
• Froment P, Jovet-Ast S. 1950. Sphagnum imbricatum Russ., subfossile en France dans une tourbe des environs de Calais. Revue Bryolo-gigue et Lichénologique 19: 125–126
   Google Scholar
• Gauthier R, Brugués M. 1997. Note sur la presence de Sphagnum affine Ren. & Card., Sphagnum centrale C. Jens. et Sphagnum papillosum Lind. aux Acores. Cryptogamie, Bryologie Lichénologie 18: 121–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green BH. 18. Factors influencing the spatial and temporal distribu-tion of Sphagnum imbricatum Hornsch. ex Russ. in the British Isles. Journal of Ecology 56: 47–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen B. 16. The raised bog Draved Kongsmose. Botanisk Tids-skrift 62: 146–185.
   Google Scholar
• Hartl DL, Clark AG. 1997. Principles of population genetics. Third edition. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Ass. Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hewitt GM. 1999. Post-glacial re-colonisation of European biota. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 68: 87–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Infante M, Heras P. 1987. Sphagnum imbricatum Hornsch. ex Russ., semifosil, en la turbera de Saldropo-Barazar (Ceanuri, Vizcaya). Estudios Instituto Alavés de la Naturaleza 2: 201–203.
   Google Scholar
• Isoviita P. 1966. Studies on Sphagnum L. I. Nomenclatural revision of the European taxa. Annales Botanici Fennici 7: 157–162.
   Google Scholar
• Karlin EF, Andrus RE. 1988. The Sphagnum species of New Jersey. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 115: 168–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JA, Parsons AN, Baxter R. 1993. Sphagnum species and polluted environments, past and future. Advances in Bryology 5: 297–313.
   Google Scholar
• Maass WSG, Harvey MJ. 1973. Studies on the taxonomy and distri-bution of Sphagnum. VII. Chromosome numbers in Sphagnum. Nova Hedwigia 24: 193–205.
   Google Scholar
• Malmer N. 1990. Constant or increasing nitrogen concentrations in Sphagnum mosses on mires in Southern Sweden during the last few decades. Aquilo Series Botanica 28: 57–65.
   Google Scholar
• Miller NG. 1984. Tertiary and Quaternary fossils. In: Schuster RM, ed. New manual of bryology. Volume 2. Nichihan: The Hattori Botanical Laboratory, 1194–1232.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell FJG, Bradshaw RHW, Hannon GE, O'Connell M, Pitcher JR, Watts WA. 1996. In: Berglund BE, Birks HJ, Ralska-Jasie-wiczowa M, Wright HE, eds. Palaeoecological events during the last 15000 years. Chichester: Wiley & Sons, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Mitton JB, Linhart YB, Sturgeon KB, Hamrick JL. 1979. Allozyme polymorphisms detected in mature needle tissue of ponderosa pine. Journal of Heredity 70: 86–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moe D, Vorren K-D, Alm T, Fimreite S, Morkved B, Nilssen E, Paus Aa, Ramfjord H, Selvik SF, Sorensen R. 1996. Norway. In: Berglund BE, Birks HJ, Ralska-Jasiewiczowa M, Wright HE, eds. Palaeoecological events during the last 15000 years. Chichester: Wiley & Sons, 153–213.
   Google Scholar
• Nei M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. American Natur-alist 106: 238–292.
   Google Scholar
• Nei M. 1975. Molecular population genetics and evolution. Amsterdam, New York: North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Newman D, Pilson D. 1997. Increased probability of extinction due to decreased genetic effective population size: experimental popula-tions of Clarkia pulchella. Evolution 51: 354–362.
   Google Scholar
• Nyholm E 1969. Illustrated moss flora of Fennoscandia. II. Musci, fascicle 6. Stockholm: Swedish Natural Science Research Council, 647–799.
   Google Scholar
• Rohlf FJ. 1997. NTSYSpc, numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. New York: Exeter Software.
   Google Scholar
• Såstad SM, Stenoien HK, Flatberg KI. 1999. Genetic variability and relationships of the Sphagnum recurvum complex (Bryophyta) - as revealed by isozyme and RAPD markers. Systematic Botany 24: 95–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider S, Kueffer J-M, Roessli D, Excoffler L. 1997. Arlequin Ver. 1.1. A software for population genetic analysis. Geneva: Genetics and Biometry Lab., University of Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• Soltis DE, Haufler CH, Darrow DC, Gastony GJ. 1983. Starch gel electrophoresis of ferns: a compilation of grinding buffers, gel and electrode buffers and staining schedules. American Fern Journal 73: 9–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenøien HK. 1999. Are enzyme loci selectively neutral in haploid populations of nonvascular plants? Evolution 53: 1050–1059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stieperaere H, Rodrigues-Oubina J, Izco J. 1988. Distribution and ecology of Sphagnum pylaisii Brid. in Northern Spain. Journal of Bryology 15: 209–217.
   Google Scholar
• Stoneburner A, Wyatt R, Odrzykoski IJ. 1991. Applications of enzyme electrophoresis to bryophyte systematics and population biology. Advances in Bryology 4: 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Stoneman R, Barber K, Maddy D. 1993. Present and past ecology of Sphagnum imbricatum and its significance in raised peat - climatic modelling. Quaternary Newsletter 70: 14–22.
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki H. 1956. Studies in the Palustria group of the Sphagna of Japan. Journal of Science of the Hiroshima University, Ser. B, Div. 2, 7: 153–172.
   Google Scholar
• Swofford DL, Selander RB. 1981. BIOSYS-1: a Fortran program for the comprehensive analysis of electrophoretic data in population genetics and systematics. Journal of Heredity 72: 281–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thingsgaard K. 2001. Population structure and genetic diversity of the amphiatlantic haploid peatmoss Sphagnum affine (Sphagnopsida). Heredity 87: 485–496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendel JF, Weeden NF. 1989. Visualization and interpretation of plant isozymes. In: Soltis DE, Soltis PS, eds. Isozymes in plant biology. Portland, Oregon: Dioscorides Press. 5-45
   Google Scholar
• Yeh FC, Yang R, Boyle T. 1999. POPGENE Version 1.31
   Google Scholar
• Zecluneister HG. 1994. Verbreitung und Okologie von Sphagnum L. sect. Sphagnum L. und sect. Acutifolia Wils. in österreichischen Mooren. Herzogia 10: 149–166.
   Google Scholar
• Zoltai SC, Pollett FC. 1983. Wetlands in Canada: their classification, distribution and use. In: Gore AJP ed. Ecosystems of the world. 4b. Mires: swamp, bog, fen and moor. Regional studies Amsterdam: Elsevier, 245–268.
   Google Scholar