Occurrence of epiphytic bryophytes in a 'tetrad' transect across southern Britain. 2. Analysis and modelling of epiphyte–environment relationships

References

• Barkman JJ. 1958. Phytosociology and ecology of cryptogamic epiphytes. Assen: Van Gorcum.
   Google Scholar
• Bates JW. 1995a. Numerical analysis of bryophyte-environment relationships in a lowland English flora. Fragmenta Floristica et Geobotanica 40: 471–490.
   Google Scholar
• Bates JW. 1995b. A bryophyte flora of Berkshire. Journal of Bryology 18: 503–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates JW. 2002. Effects on bryophytes and lichens. In: Bell JNB, Treshow M, eds. Air pollution and plant life, 2nd edn. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 309–342.
   Google Scholar
• Bates JW, Bell JNB, Farmer AM. 1990. Epiphyte recolonisation of oaks along a gradient of air pollution in south-east England, 1979-1990. Environmental Pollution 68: 81–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates JW, Bell JNB, Massara AC. 2001. Loss of Lecanora conizaeo ides and other fluctuations of epiphytes on oak in S.E. England over 21 years with declining SO2 concentrations. Atmospheric Environment 35: 2557–2568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates JW, Perry AR, Proctor MCF. 1993. The natural history of Slapton Ley National Nature Reserve. XX. The changing bryophyte flora. Field Studies 8: 279–333.
   Google Scholar
• Bates JW, Preston CD, Proctor MCF, Hodgetts NG, Perry AR. 1997. Occurrence of epiphytic bryophytes in a ‘tetrad’ transect across southern Britain. 1. Geographical trends in abundance and evidence of recent change. Journal of Bryology 19: 685–714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bharali B, Bates JW. 2004. Influences of extracellular calcium and iron on membrane sensitivity to bisulphite in the mosses Pleurozium schreberi and Rhytidiadelphus triquetrus. Journal of Bryology 26: 53–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birks HJB. 1976. The distribution of European pteridophytes: a numerical analysis. New Phytologist 77: 257–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birks HJB, Heegaard E, Birks HH, Jonsgard B. 1998. Quantifying bryophyte-environment relationships. In: Bates JW, Ashton NW, Duckett JG, eds. Bryology for the twenty-first century. Leeds: Maney and The British Bryological Society, 305–319.
   Google Scholar
• Blockeel TL, Long DG. 1998. A check-list and census catalogue of British and Irish bryophytes. Cardiff: British Bryological Society.
   Google Scholar
• Dull R. 1991. Indicator values of mosses and liverworts. In: Ellenberg H, Weber HE, Diill R, Wirth V, Werner W, PauliBen D, eds. Indicator values of plants in Central Europe. Gottingen: Erich Goltze, 175–214.
   Google Scholar
• Farmer AM, Bates JW, Bell JNB. 1992. Ecophysiological effects of acid rain on bryophytes and lichens. In: Bates JW, Farmer AM, eds. Bryophytes and lichens in a changing environment. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 284–313.
   Google Scholar
• Gauslaa Y. 1995. The Lobarion, an epiphytic community of ancient forests threatened by acid rain. Lichenologist 27: 59–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert OL. 1968. Bryophytes as indicators of air pollution in the Tyne Valley. New Phytologist 67: 15–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert OL. 1970. Further studies on the effect of sulphur dioxide on lichens and bryophytes. New Phytologist 69: 605–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson L, Eriksson I. 1995. Factors of importance for the epiphytic vegetation of aspen Populus tremula with special emphasis on bark chemistry and soil chemistry. Journal of Applied Ecology 32: 412–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haines-Young RH, Barr CJ, Black HIJ, Briggs DJ, Bunce RGH, Clarke RT, Cooper A, Dawson FH, Firbank LG, Fuller RM, Furse MT, Gillespie MK, Hill R, Hornung M, Howard DC, McCann T, Morecroft MD, Petit S, Sier ARJ, Smart SM, Smith GM, Stott AP, Stuart RC, Watkins JW. 2000. Accounting for nature: assessing habitats in the UK countryside. London: UK Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions.
   Google Scholar
• Hawksworth DL, Rose F. 1976. Lichens as pollution monitors. Studies in Biology no. 66. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Heegaard E. 1997. Ecology of Andreaea in western Norway. Journal of Bryology 19: 527–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill MO. 1991. Patterns of species distribution in Britain elucidated by canonical correspondence analysis. Journal of Biogeography 18: 247–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill MO. 2003. Using data from local floras for ecological research. Watsonia 24: 321–329.
   Google Scholar
• Hill MO, Dominguez Lozano F. 1994. A numerical analysis of the distribution of liverworts in Great Britain. In: Hill MO, Preston CD, Smith AJE, eds. Atlas of the bryophytes of Britain and Ireland. Volume 3. Mosses (Diplolepideae). Colchester: Harley Books, 11–20.
   Google Scholar
• Hifi MO, Gauch HG. 1980. Detrended correspondence analysis, an improved ordination technique. Vegetatio 42: 47–58.
   Google Scholar
• Hifi MO, Preston CD, Smith AJE. 1991. Atlas of the bryophytes of Britain and Ireland, Volume 1. Liverworts ( Hepaticae and Anthocerotae). Colchester: Harley Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hifi MO, Preston CD, Smith AJE. 1992. Atlas of the bryophytes of Britain and Ireland, Volume 2. Mosses (except Diplolepideae). Colchester: Harley Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hifi MO, Preston CD, Smith AJE. 1994. Atlas of the bryophytes of Britain and Ireland, Volume 3. Mosses (Diplolepideae). Cokhester: Harley Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hulme M, Jenkins GJ. 1998. Climatic change scenarios for the United Kingdom. UKCIP Technical Report No. 1. Norwich: Climatic Research Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Lucking R. 2003. Takhtajan's floristic regions and foliicolous lichen biogeography: a compatibility analysis. Lichenologist 35: 33–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor MCF. 1967. The distribution of British liverworts: a statistical analysis. Journal of Ecology 55: 119–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose F. 1992. Temperate forest management: its effects on bryophyte and lichen floras. In: Bates JW, Farmer AM, eds. Bryophytes and lichens in a changing environment. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 211–233.
   Google Scholar
• ter Braak CJF. 1988. CANOCO - a FORTRAN program for canonical community ordination by [partial] [detrended] [canonical] corre-spondence analysis, principal components analysis and redundancy analysis (version 2.1). Agricultural Mathematics Group, reprinted technical report LWA-88-02. Wageningen: TNO Institute of Applied Computer Science.
   Google Scholar
• ter Braak CJF. 1995. Ordination. In: Jongman RHG, ter Braak CJF, Van Tongeren OFR, eds. Data analysis in community and landscape ecology, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 91–173.
   Google Scholar
• ter Braak CJF, Looman CWN. 1995. Regression. In: Jongman RHG, ter Braak CJF, Van Tongeren OFR, eds. Data analysis in community and landscape ecology, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 29–77.
   Google Scholar
• UK Review Group. 1994. Impacts of nitrogen deposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Report of the United Kingdom Review Group on Impacts of Atmospheric Nitrogen. London: Department of the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• UKRGAR (United Kingdom Review Group on Acid Rain). 1997. Acid deposition in the United Kingdom 1992-1994. London: Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions.
   Google Scholar
• van Dobben HF, ter Braak CJF. 1999. Ranking of epiphytic lichen sensitivity to air pollution using survey data: a comparison of indicator scales. Lichenologist 31: 27–39.
   Google Scholar
• van Herk CM, Mathijssen-Spiekman EAM, de Zwart D. 2003. Long distance nitrogen air pollution effects on lichens in Europe. Lichenologist 35: 347–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar