REFERENCES
- Avdem, Anna, 1982 Oppe først og sist i seng. Husarbeid i Norge fra 1985 til i dag, Oslo.
- Berggren, B., 1984 ‘The Female Peasant and the Male Peasant. Division of Labour in Traditional Norway’, Ethnologia Scandinavica.
- Fjellheim, B., 1984 ‘Bønders arbeidsvilkår’, Humanistisk arbeidslivsforskning, Seminarrapport NAVF, Bergen.
- Fossgard, E., 1991 Arbeidsutfering-erfaringar og opplevingar. — Ei underseking av kvinnersposisjon og sosiale status pâ vestnorske garasbmk. Notat 52, Senter for samfunnsforskning, Bergen.
- Gasson, R., 1980 ‘A Questionnaire survey of farm women’, Farmers Weekly, various issues.
- Gasson, R., 1990 The hidden Workforce, a survey of the spouse’s contribution to the family farm business, Wye College.
- Gjertsen, K. R., 1977 ‘Årssyklusen i ei Nordhordalandsbygd. En tidsperiode med endringer’, Dugnad no. 2, Oslo.
- Haugen, M., 1990 ‘Female Farmers in Norwegian Agriculture. From traditional farm women to professional farmers’, Sosiologia Ruralis, Vol. xxx No. 2.
- Haugen, M., 1991 Kvinnebonden. Rapport nr. 7/1990. Senter for bygdeforskning, Trondheim.
- Inethween, Heide, 1988 ‘Life studies as a Method in Farming Women’s Research’, Paper presented in Trondheim, Norway.
- Kaul, H., 1988 ‘Makt og maskin’. I menns bilde. Kvinner-tekno logi-arbeid, Trondheim.
- Korsvold, T., 1982 Ute og inne fra morra til kveld. En analyse avgdrdkonenes situasjon på Nord-Frøya og Verdal i mellom-krigstiden, Hovedfagsoppgave Historisk institutt, Universitetet i Trondheim.
- Lie, M. m.fl., 1988 ‘I menns bilde? Perspektiver på studiet av teknologi og teknikk i kvinners arbeidsliv’, I menns bilde. Kvinner-teknologi-arbeid, Trondheim.
- Thorsen, L. E., 1989 Det fleksible kjønn. Mentalitetsendringer i tre generasioner bondekvinner, 1920-1985 (Institutt for etnologi, Universitetet i Oslo), Oslo.
- Thorsen, L. E., 1986 ‘Work and Gender, The Sexual Division of Labour and Farmers’ Attitudes to Labour in Central Norway, 1920-1980’, Ethnologia Europaea XVI, 2.
- Whatmore, S., 1990 Farming Women. Gender, Work and Family Enterprise, London.
- ‘Position’ is here used about the actual, ‘objective’ position in the organization of the work at the farm.
- ‘Technology’ we will define as the set of existing techniques,, and knowledge and ability to utilize the techniques. (A further discussion of this notion in Fossgard (1987) and Kaul and Lie (1988).)
- Totally about 60 farming women in three districts (Stord and Voss in the county of Hordaland and Hâ in the county of Rogaland) have been interviewed, and these represent various groups of age, various districts and various size of farm and house-keeping.
- The quantitative survey comprised all working as farming women in the three selected districts. The questionnaire contained 124 questions, and the survey had 427 respondents.
- The figure is taken from K. R. Gjertsen, ‘Ârssyklusen i ei Nordhordlandsbygd. En tidsperiode med endringer’, in Dugnad no. 2 (1977).
- The term ‘female farmer’ comprises here all women that take an active part in the running of the farm, alone or together with the husband. I do not confine the term to only those being the sole or main responsible person for the farm, as the sociologist Marit Haugen does (Haugen, 1991).