Measurements of the sagittal condylar inclination: intraindividual variations

References

• Alomar X, Medrano J, Cabratosa J, Clavero JA, Lorente M, Serra I, et al.. Anatomy of the temporomandibular joint. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2007;28:170–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Som MP, Curtin HD. Head and neck imaging. St Louis: Mosby; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Tomas X, Pomes J, Berenguer J, Quinto L, Nicolau C, Mercader JM, et al.. MR imaging of temporomandibular joint dysfunction: a pictorial review. Radiographics. 2006;26:765–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubein-Meesenburg D, Fanghanel J, Ihlow D, Lotzmann U, Hahn W, Thieme KM, et al.. Functional state of the mandible and rolling-gliding characteristics in the TMJ. Ann Anat. 2007;189:393–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reicheneder C, Gedrange T, Baumert U, Faltermeier A, Proff P. Variations in the inclination of the condylar path in children and adults. Angle Orthod. 2009;79:958–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ow RK, Djeng SK, Ho CK. The relationship of upper facial proportions and the plane of occlusion to anatomic reference planes. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;61:727–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartono R. The occlusal plane in relation to facial types. J Prosthet Dent. 1967;17:549–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson A, Posselt U. Relationship of various skull reference lines. J Prosthet Dent. 1961;11:1045–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price RB, Kolling JN, Clayton JA. Effects of changes in articulator settings on generated occlusal tracings. Part I: Condylar inclination and progressive side shift settings. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;65:237–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundeen HC, Shryock EF, Gibbs CH. An evaluation of mandibular border movements: their character and significance. J Prosthet Dent. 1978;40:442–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caro AJ, Peraire M, Martinez-Gomis J, Anglada JM, Samso J. Reproducibility of lateral excursive tooth contact in a semi-adjustable articulator depending on the type of lateral guidance. J Oral Rehabil. 2005;32:174–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shillingburg HT, Hobo S, Whitsett LD, Jacobi R, Brackett SE. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. Chicago, IL: Quintessence; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Wachtel HC, Curtis DA. Limitations of semiadjustable articulators. Part I: Straight line articulators without setting for immediate side shift. J Prosthet Dent. 1987;58:438–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingervall B. Range of sagittal movement of the mandibular condyles and inclination of the condyle path in children and adults. Acta Odontol Scand. 1972;30:67–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohlmia JT, Ghosh J, Sinha PK, Nanda RS, Currier GF. Tomographic assessment of temporomandibular joints in patients with malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 1996;66:27–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakar O, Calisir F, Oztas E, Marsan G. Evaluation of the effects of temporomandibular joint disk displacement and its progression on dentocraniofacial morphology in symptomatic patients using lateral cephalometric analysis. J Craniomandib Pract. 2011;29:211–8.
   Google Scholar
• Zabarovic D, Jerolimov V, Carek V, Vojvodic D, Zabarovic K, Bukovic D Jr. The effect of tooth loss on the TM-joint articular eminence inclination. Coll Antropol. 2000;24:37–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasinevicius TR, Pyle MA, Lalumandier JA, Nelson S, Kohrs KJ, Turp JC, et al.. Asymmetry of the articular eminence in dentate and partially edentulous populations. J Craniomandib Pract. 2006;24:85–94.
   Google Scholar
• Katsavrias EG. Changes in articular eminence inclination during the craniofacial growth period. Angle Orthod. 2002;72:258–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reicheneder C, Proff P, Baumert U, Gedrange T. Comparison of maximum mouth-opening capacity and condylar path length in adults and children during the growth period. Ann Anat. 2008;190:344–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linsen SS, Stark H, Matthias A. Changes in condylar position using different types of splints with and without a chinstrap: a case-control study. J Craniomandib Pract. 2012;30:25–31.
   Google Scholar
• Tokutomi J, Hayasaki H, Saitoh I, Iwase Y, Fukami A, Yamada C, et al.. Mandibular open-close motion in children with anterior crossbite occlusion. J Craniomandib Pract. 2010;28:10–8.
   Google Scholar
• Seedorf H, Weitendorf H, Scholz A, Kirsch I, Heydecke G. Effect of non-working occlusal contacts on vertical condyle position. J Oral Rehabil. 2009;36:435–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widman DJ. Functional and morphologic considerations of the articular eminence. Angle Orthod. 1988;58:221–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbett NE, DeVincenzo JP, Huffer RA, Shryock EF. The relation of the condylar path to the articular eminence in mandibular protrusion. Angle Orthod. 1971;41:286–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier B, Luck O, Harzer W. Interocclusal clearance during speech and in mandibular rest position. A comparison between different measuring methods. J Orofac Orthop. 2003;64:121–34.
   Google Scholar
• Baqaien MA, Al-Salti FM, Muessig D. Changes in condylar path inclination during maximum protrusion between the ages of 6 and 12 years. J Oral Rehabil. 2007;34:27–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne JA. Condylar determinants in a patient population: electronic pantograph assessment. J Oral Rehabil. 1997;24:157–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solberg WK, Clark GT. Reproducibility of molded condylar controls with an intraoral registration method. Part I. Simulated movement. J Prosthet Dent. 1974;32:520–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamaki K. A study on objective assessment of pathway in areas of intercuspal position during chewing movements. An evaluation from movement-path angles by grinding patterns intercuspal position during chewing movements. J Jpn Prosthod Soc. 1992;36:367–80.
   Google Scholar
• Ai M. A study of masticatory movement at the incision inferius. J Jpn Prosthod Soc. 1962;6:164–200.
   Google Scholar
• Hernandez AI, Jasinevicius TR, Kaleinikova Z, Sadan A. Symmetry of horizontal and sagittal condylar path angles: an in vivo study. J Craniomandib Pract. 2010;28:60–6.
   Google Scholar
• Aull AE. Condylar determinants of occlusal patterns. J Prosthet Dent. 1965;15:826–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamacona JM, Otaduy E, Aranda E. Study of the sagittal condylar path in edentulous patients. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68:314–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morneburg TR, Proschel PA. Predicted incidence of occlusal errors in centric closing around arbitrary axes. Int J Prosthodont. 2002;15:358–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welsch BB. The distribution of the radius of the curve scribed during protrusion. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;51:518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posselt U. Physiology of occlusion and rehabilitation. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis DA. A comparison of protrusive interocclusal records to pantographic tracings. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;62:154–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar