References
- Lewis SM. Reference ranges and normal values. In: Lewis SM, Bain BJ, Bates I. (eds) Dacie and Lewis practical haematology. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, 2006; 11–24.
- Davies S, Bain BJ. Basophil counts on the Technicon H*1 automated counter. Clin Lab Haem 1996; 18: 35–38.
- Bizarro N. Pseudobasophilia on the Technicon automated cell counters. Clin Lab Haem 1996; 18: 298–299.
- Hur M, Lee YK, Lee KM, Kim Hi, Cho HI. Pseudobasophilia asan erroneous white blood cell differential count with a discrepancy between automated cell counters: report of two cases. Clin Lab Haem 2004; 26: 287–290.
- Lesesve JF, Benbih M, Lecompte T. Accurate basophils counting:not an easy goal! Clin Lab Haem 2005; 27: 143–144.
- Buttarello M, Plebani M. Automated Blood Cell Counts. Am J Clin Pathol 2008; 130: 104–116.
- Ducrest S, Meier F, Tschopp R, Pavlovic R, Dahinden CA. Flow cytometric analysis of basophil counts in human blood and inaccuracy of hematology analyzers. Allergy 2005; 60: 1446–1450.
- d'Onofrio G. PANDA — Innovative classification of hematopoieticmalignancies. Bloodline Reviews 2001; 2—R: 3–6.
- Gibbs G. Peroxidase activity and nuclear density analysis (PANDA) in the diagnosis of haematological malignancy. Brit J Biomed Sci 2005; 62(3): 142–144.
- Gibbs G. Peroxidase activity and nuclear density analysis in the diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 2005; 106(11): 4533a.
- Simson E, Ross DW, Kocher WD. Atlas of automated cytochemicalhematology. New York: Technicon Instruments Corporation, 1988; 82–83.