References
- Baglin T. Venous thromboembolism in hospitalised patients: a public health crisis? Br J Haematol 2008; 141(6): 764–770.
- Department of Health. Report of the independent expert workinggroup on the prevention of venous thromboembolism in hospita-lised patients. 2007; Available at: http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_073944 (accessed 23 September 2008).
- Kelly J, Hunt BJ. The utility of pretest proability assessment inpatients with clinically suspected venous thromboembolism. J Thromb Haemost 2003; 1(9): 1888–96.
- Elf JL, Strandberg K, Nilsson C, Svensson PJ. Clinical probabilityassessment and D-dimer determination in patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis, a prospective multicenter management study. Thromb Res 2009; 123: 612–616.
- Ljungqvist M, Soderberg M, Moritz P et al. Evaluation of Wellsscore and repeated D-dimer in diagnosing venous thromboembo-lism. Eur J Intern Med 2008; 19(4): 285–288.
- Wells PS, Hirsh J, Anderson DR et al. A simple clinical model forthe diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis combined with impedance plethysmography: potential for an improvement in the diagnostic process. J Intern Med 1998; 243(1): 15–23.
- Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M et al. Derivation of a simpleclinical model to categorize patients' probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the model's utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer. Thromb Haemost 2000; 83(3): 416–420.
- Crowther MA, Cook DJ, Griffith LE et al. Neither baseline tests ofmolecular hypercoagulability nor D-dimer levels predict deep venous thrombosis in critically ill medical-surgical patients. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31(1): 48–55.
- Wells PS. Integrated strategies for the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism. J Thromb Haemost 2007; 5(Suppl 1): 41–50.
- Keeling DM, Mackie Ii, Moody A, Watson HG, The Haemostasis and Thrombosis Task Force of the British Committee for Standards in Haematology. The diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis in symptomatic outpatients and the potential for clinical assess-ment and D-dimer assays to reduce the need for diagnostic imaging. Br J Haematol 2004; 124(1): 15–25.
- Michiels JJ, Gadisseur A, van der Planken M et al. Different accuracies of rapid enzyme-linked immunosorbent, turbidimetric, and agglutination D-dimer assays for thrombosis exclusion: impact on diagnostic work-ups of outpatients with suspected deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Semin Thromb Hemost 2006; 32(7): 678–693.
- Subramaniam RM, Snyder B, Heath R et al. Diagnosis of lower limb deep venous thrombosis in emergency department patients: performance of Hamilton and modified Wells' scores. Ann Emerg Med 2006; 48(6): 678–685.
- Klok FA, Kruisman E, Spaan J, et al. Comparison of the revised Geneva score with the Wells' rule for assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost 2008; 6(1): 40 14.
- Gibson NS, Sohne M, Gerdes YE, Nijkeuter M, Buller HR. The importance of clinical probability assessment in interpreting a normal d-dimer in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Chest 2008; 134(4): 789–793.
- van Belle A, Buller HR, Huisman MV et al. Christopher Study Investigators. Effectiveness of managing suspected pulmonary embolism using an algorithm combining clinical probability, D-dimer testing, and computed tomography. JAMA 2006; 295(2): 172–179.
- Righini M, Le Gal G, Perrier A, Bounameaux H. Clinical probability assessment of pulmonary embolism by the Wells' score: is the easiest the best? J Thromb Haemost 2006; 4(3): 702–704.
- Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M et al. Excluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside without diagnostic imaging: management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism presenting to the emergency department by using a simple clinical model and D-dimer. Ann Intern Med 2001; 135(2): 98–107.
- Sanson BJ, Lijmer JG, MacGillavry MR et al. Comparison of a clinical probability estimate and two clinical models in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. ANTELOPE study group. Thromb Haemost 2000; 83(2): 199–203.
- Chagnon I, Bounameaux H, Aujesky D et al. Comparison of two clinical prediction rules and implicit assessment among patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Am J Med 2002; 113(4): 269–275.
- Kabrhel C, McAfee AT, Goldhaber SZ. The contribution of the subjective component of the Canadian Pulmonary Embolism Score to the overall score in emergency department patients. Acad Emerg Med 2005; 12(10): 915–920.