182
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Immigrant children in the age of educational reform

References

  • Batalova, J., Fix, M., & Murray, J. (2005). English language learner adolescents: Demographics and literacy achievements. Report to the Center for Applied Linguistics. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.
  • Center for Public Education (2011). The United States of education: The changing demographics of the United States and their schools. Retrieved from http://www.centerforpubliceducation.org/You-May-Also-Be-Interested-In-landing-page-level/Organizing-a-School-YMABI/The-United-States-of-education-The-changing-demographics-of-the-United-States-and-their-schools.html.
  • Cizek, G. J. (2001). More unintended consequences of high-stakes testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 20(4), 19–27.
  • Collier, V. (1995). Promoting academic success for ESL students. Jersey City, NJ: NJTESOL.
  • Corson, D. (1993). Language minority education and gender: Linking social justice and power. Great Britain: WBC Manufacturers Ltd.
  • Cummins, J. (1981). The role of primary language development in promoting educational success for language minority students. In California State Department of Education (Ed.), Schooling and language minority students: A theoretical framework (pp. 3–49). Los Angeles, CA: Evaluation, Dissemination and Assessment Center, California State University, Los Angeles.
  • Cummins, J. (1991). Interdependence of first and second language proficiency in bilingual children. In E. Bialystok (Ed.), Language processing in bilingual children (pp. 70–89). Cambridge, England: University Press.
  • Cummins, J. (1999). Alternate paradigms in bilingual education research. Does theory have a place? Educational Researcher, 28(7), 26–32.
  • Cummins, J. (2001). Negotiating identities: Education for empowerment in a diverse society (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: California Association for Bilingual Education.
  • Cummins, J. (2012). The intersection of cognitive and sociocultural factors in the development of reading comprehension among immigrant students. Reading and Writing, 25(8), 1973–1990.
  • Cummins, J., & Danesi, M. (1990). Heritages and languages: The development and denial of Canada's linguistic resources. Toronto: Our Schools Our Selves/Garamond.
  • Ehren, M. C., & Hatch, T. (2013). Responses of schools to accountability systems using multiple measures: The case of New York City elementary schools. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 25(4), 341–373.
  • Fernandez, D. R., Carlson, D. S., Stepina, L. P., & Nicholson, J. D. (1997). Holfstede's country classification 25 years later. The Journal of Social Psychology, 137(1), 43–54.
  • Fillmore, L. W. (1991). A question for early-childhood programs? English first or families first? Education Week, 10(39), 32.
  • Fillmore, L. W. (2000). Loss of family languages: Should educators be concerned? Theory into Practice, 39(4), 203–210.
  • Goldenberg, C. (2008). Teaching English language learners: What the research does-and does not-say. American Educator, 32(2), 8–23, 42–43.
  • Haas, E. (2005). The equal educational opportunity act 30 years later: Time to revisit “appropriate action” for assisting English language learners. Journal of Law and Education, 34(3), 361–387.
  • Harper, C., & DeJong, E. (2004). Misconceptions about teaching English-language learners. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 48(2), 152–162.
  • Hofstede, G. (1987). The applicability of McGregor's theories in South East Asia. The Journal of Management Development, 6(3), 9–19.
  • Just, K. (2009). Bilingual education vs. English immersion. CQ Researcher, 19(43), 1021–1049. Retrieved from http://www.sagepub.com/healeyregc6e/study/chapter/cq/87318_02.pdf.
  • Kim, J. H., & Abernathy, D. (2012). Understanding curriculum as a polyphonic text: Curriculum theorizing in the midst of standardization. JCT (Online), 28(1), 38–46.
  • Krashen, S. D. (1996). Under attack: The case against bilingual education. Culver City, CA: Language Education Associates.
  • Krashen, S. D. (1999). Condemned without a trial: Bogus arguments against bilingual education. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Lopez, M. G., & Tashakkori, A. (2006). Differential outcomes of two bilingual education programs on English language learners. Bilingual Research Journal, 30(1), 123–132, 134–145, 238–239.
  • Mora, J., Wink, J., & Wink, D. (2001). Dueling models of dual language instruction: A critical review of the literature and program implementation guide. Bilingual Research Journal, 25(4), 435–460.
  • Murphy, A. F. (2010). Dual language programs: Are they an effective model for teaching English language learners?. Long Island Education Review, 9(1), 6–13.
  • National Center for Education Statistics (2013). The condition of education: English language learners. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cgf.asp.
  • National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers (2012). Common Core State Standards. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers.
  • NCELA (2011). The growing number of English learner students 1998/99–2008/09. Available from The U.S. Department of Education Office of English Language Acquisition, Language Enhancement and Academic Achievement for Limited English Proficient Students. Retrieved from http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/files/uploads/9/growingLEP_0809.pdf.
  • No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 USC 6301 et seq. (2002). Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/eseea02/107.html.
  • Ramirez, D. R., Yuen, S. D., Ramey, D. R., & Pasta, D. J. (1991). Final report: Longitudinal study of structured English immersion, early-exit and late exit-exit bilingual education programs (Vol. I). San Mateo, CA: Prepared for United States Department of Education, Aguirre International no. 300-87-056.
  • Tarasawa, B. (2007/2008). Mixed messages in media coverage of bilingual education: The case of Atlanta, Georgia. Bilingual Research Journal, 31(1/2), 23–46.
  • U.S. Department of Education (2004). Office of English Language Acquisition. Retrieved from http://www.netc.org/focus/images/pdf/ell.pdf.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.