Understanding Workplace Processes and Factors that Influence Exposures to Engineered Nanomaterials

References

• International Council on Nanotechnology (ICON). A survey of current practices in the nanotechnology workplace. Phase two report. [Internet] 2006 Nov 13 [updated 2008 Oct 13; cited 2009 Dec 15]. Houston, TX: Rice University. Available from: http://cohesion.rice.edu/centersandinst/icon/emplibrary/ICONNanotechSurvey_indexed_Full%20Reduced.pdf..
   Google Scholar
• Schulte PA, Schubauer-Berigan MK, Mayweather C, Geraci CL, Zumwalde R, McKernan JL. Issues in the development of epi-demiologic studies of workers exposed to engineered nanopar-ticles. J Occup Environ Med. 2009; 51 (3): 323–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lux Research. Nanomaterials state of the market Q1 2009: Cleantech's dollar investments, penny returns [Internet] 2008 Dec 22 [cited 2009 Dec 15]. Available from: http://portal.luxresearchinc.com/research/document_excerpt/4248.
   Google Scholar
• Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies. Consumer Products Inventory [Internet, updated 2009 Aug 25; cited 2009 Dec 15]. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Available from: http://www.nanotechproject.org/inventories/consumer
   Google Scholar
• Thayer AM. Carbon nanotubes by the metric ton. Chem and Eng News. 2007; 85: 29–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• China Chemical Reporter. Worsening supply shortage of carbonblack feedstock oils. (Organics). [Internet] 2008 Nov 6 [cited 2009 Sept 9]. Available from: http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-189288778.html.
   Google Scholar
• Rakov EG. The current status of carbon nanotube and nanofiber production. Nanotechnol in Russia. 2008; 3: 575–580.
   Google Scholar
• Robichaud CO, Uyar AE, Darby MR, Zucker LG, Wiesner MR. Estimates of upper bounds and trends in nano-Ti02 production as a basis for exposure assessment. Environ Sci Technol. 2009; 43 (12): 4227–4233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI). Research and devel-opment leading to a revolution. I Technology and industry: Supplement to the President's 2010 budget [Internet] 2009 May [cited 2009 Dec 1]. Arlington, VA: US National Nanotech-nology Coordination Office. Available from http://www.nano.gov/NNI_2010_budget_supplement.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Schulte P, Geraci C, Zumwalde R, Hoover M, Kuempel E. Occu-pational risk management of engineered nanoparticles. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2008; 5 (4): 239–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Council on Nanotechnology (ICON). Towards predicting nano-bio interactions: An international assessment of nanotechnology environment health and safety research needs [Internet] 2008 May 1 [cited 2009 Dec 15]. Houston, TX: Rice University. Available from: http://cohesion.rice.edu/CentersAndInst/ICON/emplibrary/ICON_RNA_Report_Fu112.Pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dick CA, Brown DM, Donaldson K, Stone V. The role of free radicals in the toxic and inflammatory effects of four different ultrafine particle types. Inhal Toxicol. 2003; 15 (1): 39–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warheit DB, Webb TR, Reed XL, Frerichs S, Sayes CM. Pul-monary toxicity study in rats with three forms of ultrafine-Ti02 particles: Differential responses related to surface properties. Toxicol. 2007; 230 (1): 90–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poland CA, Duffin R, Kinloch I, Maynard A, Wallace WAH, Seaton A, Stone V, Brown S, William MacNee W, Donaldson K. Carbon nanotubes introduced into the abdominal cavity of mice show asbestos-like pathogenicity in a pilot study. Nat Nan-otechnol. 2008, 3 (7): 423–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayes CM, Wahi R, Kurian PA, Liu Y, West JL, Ausman KD, Warheit DB, Colvin VL. Correlating nanoscale titania structure with toxicity: A cytotoxicity and inflammatory response study with human dermal fibroblasts and human lung epithelial cells. Toxicol Sci. 2006; 92 (1): 174–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen S, Larsen B, Olsen S, Baun A. Categorization framework to aid hazard identification of nanomaterials. Nanotoxicol. 2007; 1 (3): 243–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer DH, Gijsbers JH, Lurvink MW. Personal exposure to ultrafine particles in the workplace: Exploring sampling tech-niques and strategies. Ann Occup Hyg. 2004; 48 (5)439–453.
   Google Scholar
• Oberdorster G, Oberdorster E, Oberdorster J. Nanotoxicology: An emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine parti-cles. Environ Health Perspect. 2005; 113 (7): 823–839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Approaches to safe nanotechnology: Managing the health and safety concerns associated with engineered nanomaterials. NIOSH Publication No. 2009-125. Washington, DC and Atlanta, GA: US Department Of Health And Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Demou E, Peter P, Hellweg S. Exposure to manufactured nanos-tructured particles in an industrial pilot plant. Ann Occup Hyg. 2008; 52 (8): 695–706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters TM, Elzey S, Johnson R, Park H, Grassian VH, Maher T, O'Shaughnessy P. Airborne monitoring to distinguish engi-neered nanomaterials from incidental particles for environ-mental health and safety. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2009; 6 (2)73–81.
   Google Scholar
• Tielemans E, Schneider T, Goede H, Tischer M, Warren N, Kromhout H, Van Tongeren M, Van Hemmen J, Cherrie JW. Conceptual model for assessment of inhalation exposure: Defining modifying factors. Ann Occup Hyg. 2008; 52 (7): 577–586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard AD, Baron PA, Foley M, Shvedova AA, Kisin ER, Cas-tranova V. Exposure to carbon nanotube material: Aerosol release during the handling of unrefined single-walled carbon nanotube material. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2004; 67 (1)87–107.
   Google Scholar
• Conti JA, Killpack K, Gerritzen G, Huang L, Mircheva M, Delmas M, Harthorn BH, Appelbaum RP, Holden PA. Health and safety practices in the nanomaterials workplace: Results from an international survey. Environ Sci Technol. 2008; 42 (9): 3155-3162.
   Google Scholar
• Schmid K, Danuser B, Riediker M. Nanoparticle usage and pro-tection measures in the manufacturing industry-A representa-tive survey. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2010; 7 (4): 224–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woskie S. Workplace practices for nanomaterial manufacturers. Wiley Wires Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. Pub-lished Online: Jun 302010. DOI: 10.1002/wnan.101.
   Google Scholar
• Han JH, Lee EJ, Lee JH, So KP, Lee VII, Bae GN, Lee SB, Ji JH, Cho MH, Yu IJ. Monitoring multiwalled carbon nanotube expo-sure in carbon nanotube research facility. Inhal Toxicol. 2008; 20 (8) :741–749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlbusch T, Neumann S, Fissan H. Number size distribution, mass concentration, and particle composition of PM1, PM2.5 and PM10 in bag filling areas of carbon black production. J Occup Environl Hyg. 2004; 1 (10): 660–671.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlbusch T, Fissan H. Particle characteristics in the reactor and pelletizing areas of carbon black production. J Occup Envi-ronl Hyg. 2006; 3 (10): 558–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Methner M, Hodson L, Dames A, Geraci C. Nanoparticle Emis-sion Assessment Technique (NEAT) for the identification and measurement of potential inhalation exposure to engineered nanomaterials-Part B: Results from 12 field studies. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2010 B; 7 (3): 163–176.
   Google Scholar
• Lee JH, Lee SB, Bae GN, Jeon KS, Yoon JU, Ji JH, Sung JH, Lee BG, Yang JS, Kim HY et al. Exposure assessment of carbon nan-otube manufacturing workplaces. Inhal Toxicol. 2010; 22 (5): 369–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demou E, Stark WJ, Hellweg S. Particle emission and exposure during nanoparticle synthesis in research laboratories. Ann Occup Hyg. 2009; 53 (8): 829–838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer DH. Exposure to manufactured nanoparticles in dif-ferent workplaces. Toxicol. 2010; 269: 120–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seaton A, Tran L, Aitken R, Donaldson K. Nanoparticles, human health hazard and regulation. J R Soc Interface. 7 Suppl 1: S119–12935.
   Google Scholar
• Yeganeh B, Kull CM, Hull MS, Marr LC. Characterization of airborne particles during production of carbonaceous nanoma-terials. Environ Sci and Technol. 2008; 42 (12): 4600–4606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Methner MM. Engineering case reports. Effectiveness of local exhaust ventilation (LEV) in controlling engineered nanomate-rial emissions during reactor cleanout operations. J Occup Env-iron Hyg. 2008; 5 (6): D63–69.
   Google Scholar
• Fujitani Y, Kobayashi T, Arashidani K, Kunugita N, Suemura K. Measurement of the physical properties of aerosols in a fullerene factory for inhalation exposure assessment. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2008; 5 (6): 380–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bello D, Hart AJ, Ahn K, Hallock M,. Particle exposure levels during CVD growth and subsequent handling of vertically-aligned carbon nanotube films. Carbon. 2008; 46: 974–981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai SJ, Hofmann M, Hallock M, Ada E, Kong J, Ellenbecker M. Characterization and evaluation of nanoparticle release during the synthesis of single-walled and multiwalled carbon nanotubes by chemical vapor deposition. Environ Sci Technol. 2009; 43 (15): 6017-6023.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai S, Ada E, Isaacs J, Ellenbecker MJ. Airborne nanoparticle exposures associated with the manual handling of nanoalumina in fume hoods. J Nanoparticle Res. 2009; 11: 147–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson DR, Methner MM, Kennedy AJ, Steevens JA. Potential for occupational exposure to engineered carbon-based nano-materials in environmental laboratory studies. Environ Health Perspect. 2010; 118 (1): 49–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Methner MM, Birch ME, Evans DE, Ku BK, Crouch K, Hoover MD. Identification and characterization of potential sources of worker exposure to carbon nanofibers during polymer compos-ite laboratory operations. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2007; 4 (12): D125–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai S, Ashter A, Ada E, Mead J, Barry C, Ellenbecker MJ. Air-borne nanoparticle release associated with the compounding of nanocomposites using nanoalumina as fillers. Aerosol and Air Quality Res. 2008; 8 (2): 160–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bello D, Wardle BL, Yamamoto N, Guzman deVilloria R, Garcia EJ, Hart AJ, Ahn K, Ellenbecker MJ, Hallock M. Exposure to nanoscale particles and fibers during machining of hybrid advanced composites containing carbon nanotubes. J Nanopar-tide Res. 2009; 11 (1): 231–249.
   Google Scholar
• Bello D, Wardle B, Zhang J, Yamamoto N, Santeufemio C, Hal-lock M, Virji MA. Characterization of exposures to nanoscale particles and fibers during drilling of hybrid advanced compos-ites containing carbon nanotubes. Int J of Occup and Environ Health. 2010. (In press)
   Google Scholar
• Symanski E, Maberti S, Chan W. A meta-analytic approach for characterizing the within-worker and between-worker sources of variation in occupational exposure. Ann Occup Hyg. 2006; 50 (4)343–357.
   Google Scholar
• Kromhout H, Fransman W, Vermeulen R, Roff M, van Hemmen J.J. Variability of task-based dermal exposure measurements from a variety of workplaces. Ann Occup Hyg. 2004; 48 (3)187–196.
   Google Scholar
• Ahn K, Woskie S, DiBerardinis L, Ellenbecker M. A review of published quantitative experimental studies on factors affecting laboratory fume hood performance. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2008; 5 (11): 735–753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfefferkorn FE, Bello D, Haddad G, Park JY, Powell M, McCarthy J, Bunker XL, Fehrenbacher A, Jeon Y, Virji MA et al. Characterization of exposures to airborne nanoscale particles during friction stir welding of aluminum. Ann Occup Hyg. 2010. doi:10.1093/annhyg/meq037.
   Google Scholar
• Meijster T, Tielemans E, Schinkel J, Heederik D. Evaluation of peak exposures in the dutch flour processing industry: Implica-tions for intervention strategies. Ann Occup Hyg. 2008; 52 (7): 587–596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paik SY, Zalk DM, Swuste P. Application of a pilot control band-ing tool for risk level assessment and control of nanoparticle exposures. Ann Occup Hyg. 2008; 52 (6): 419–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar