A Review of Selected Engineered Nanoparticles in the Atmosphere: Sources, Transformations, and Techniques for Sampling and Analysis

References

• Oberdorster G, Oberdorster, E. Oberdorster J. Nanotoxicology: An emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ Health Perspec. 2005; 113 (7): 823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood E. Nanotechnology: Looking as we leap. Environ Health Perspec. 2004; 112 (13): A740–A749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsuji, JS, Maynard AD, Howard PC, James JT, Lam C, Warheit DB, Santamaria AB. Research strategies for safety evaluation of nanomaterials, part W: Risk assessment of nanoparticles. Toxi-col Sci. 2006; 89 (1): 42–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone V, Johnston H, Clift MJD. Air pollution, ultrafine and nanoparticle toxicology: Cellular and molecular interactions. IEEE Trans Nanobiosci. 2007: 6 (4): 331–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer DE, Curran MA, Gonzalez MA. An examination of existing data for the industrial manufacture and use of nanocomponents and their role in the life cycle impact of nanoproducts. Environ Sci Technol. 2009; 43 (5): 1256–1263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Englert BC. Nanomaterials and the environment: Uses, methods and measurement. J Environ Monit. 2007; 9 (11): 1154–1161.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cass, GR, Hughes LA, Bhave P, Kleeman MJ, Allen JO, Salmon LG. The chemical composition of atmospheric ultrafine parti-cles. Phil Trans Royal Soc A. 2000; 358 (1775) 2581–2592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niessner R. Chemical Characterization of aerosols-Online and in situ. Angew Chem (International Edition in English). 1991; 30 (5): 466–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auffan M, Rose J, Wiesner MR, Bottero J-Y Chemical stability of metallic nanoparticles: A parameter controlling their poten-tial cellular toxicity in vitro. Environ Poll. 2009; 157 (4): 1127–1133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamson IYR, Prieditis H, Vincent R. Pulmonary toxicity of an atmospheric particulate sample is due to the soluble fraction. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1999; 157 (1): 43–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Klot S, Wilke G, Tuch T, Heinrich J, Dockery DW, Schwartz J, Kreyling WG, Wichmann FIE, Peters A. Increased asthma medication use in association with ambient fine and ultrafine particles. Eur Respir J. 2002; 20 (3): 691–702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowack B, Bucheli TD. Occurrence, behavior and effects of nanoparticles in the environment. Environ Pollut. 2007; 150 (1): 5–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kittelson DB. Engines and nanoparticles: A review. J Aerosol Sci. 1998; 29(5-6): 575–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Nanotechnology white paper. EPA100/B-07/001. Washington, DC: EPA; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Nanomaterials research strategy. EPA 620/K-09/011. Washington DC: EPA; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hedrick JB. Rare earths. In: Minerals Yearbook. Vol I: Metals and Minerals. United States Geological Survey (USGS): Reston, VA; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Reff A, Bhave PV, Simon H, Pace TG, Pouliot GA, Mobley JD, Houyoux M. Emissions inventory of PM2.5 trace elements across the United States. Environ Sci Technol. 2009. 43 (15) 5790–5796.
   Google Scholar
• Reinhardt K, Winkler H. Cerium mischmetal, cerium alloys, and cerium compounds. In: Ullmann's encyclopedia of indus-trial chemistry. Vol. A6. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH; 1996
   Google Scholar
• Costatini M. Evaluation of human health risk from cerium added to diesel fuel. Boston, MA: Health Effects Institute; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Corma A, Atienzar P, Garcia H, Chane-Chingy Y. Hierarchically mesostructured doped Ce02 with potential for solar-cell use. Nat Mater. 2004; 3 (6): 394–397.
   Google Scholar
• Pati RK, Lee IC, Chu DR, Hou SC, Ehrman S.H. Nanosized ceria-based water-gas shift (WGS) catalyst for fuel cell applica-tions. Abst of the Amer Chem Soc. 2004; 228: 220.
   Google Scholar
• Jung HJ, Kittelson DB, Zachariah MR The influence of a cerium additive on ultrafine diesel particle emissions and kinetics of oxidation. Combust and Flame. 2005; 142 (3): 276–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerulean International Limited. 211b Submission Tier 1 Sum-mary Report for EnviroxTM, non-confidential version, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Guo MN, Guo CX, Jin LY, Lu JQ, Luo MF. Nano-sized Ce02 with extra-high surface area and its activity for CO oxidation. Mat Let. 2010; 64 (14): 1638–1640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karakoti AS, Monteiro-Riviere NA, Aggarwal R, Davis JP, Narayan RJ, Self WT, McGinnis J, Seal S. Nanoceria as antioxi- dant: Synthesis and biomedical applications. J Miner Metal Mater Soc. 2008; 60 (3): 33–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machida M, Murata Y, Kishikawa K, Zhang D, Ikeue K. On the reasons for high activity of Ce02 catalyst for soot oxidation. Chem of Mater. 2008; 20 (13): 4489–4494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ntainjua E, Taylor SH. The catalytic total oxidation of poly-cyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Top in Catalysis. 2009; 52 (5): 528–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonsen SB, Dahl S, Johnson E, Helveg S. Ceria-catalyzed soot oxidation studied by environmental transmission electron microscopy. J Catalysis. 2008; 255 (1): 1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahaye J, Boehm S, Chambrion Ph., Ehrburger P. Influence of cerium oxide on the formation and oxidation of soot. Combust and Flame. 1996; 104(1-2): 199–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summers JC, Van Houtte S, Psaras D. Simultaneous control of particulate and NOx emissions from diesel engines. Appl Catalyis B: Environ. 1996. 10: 139–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okuda T, Schauer JJ, Olson MR, Shafer MM, Rutter AP, Walz KA, Morshauser PA. Effects of a platinum-cerium bimetallic fuel additive on the chemical composition of diesel engine exhause particles. Energy & Fuels. 2009; 23: 4874–4980.
   Google Scholar
• Skillas G, Qian Z, Baltensperger U, Matter U, Burtscher H. The influence of additives on the size distribution and composition of particles produced by diesel engines. Combust Sci Technol. 2000; 154: 259–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckert EG, Karakoti AS, Seal S, Self WT. The role of cerium redox state in the SOD mimetic activity of nanocerium. Bio-mater. 2008; 29: 2705–2709.
   Google Scholar
• Cervini-Silva J, Fowle D, Banfield JF. Biogenic dissolution of soil ceriumphosphate minerals. Am J Sci. 2005; 305: 711–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiser MA, Westerhoff P, Benn T, Wang T, Perez-Rivera J, Hris-tovski K. Titanium nanomaterial removal and release from wastewater treatment plants. Environ Sci Technol. 2009. 43, 6757–6763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klaine SJ, Pedro, Alvarez JJ, Batley GE, Fernandes TF, Handy RD, Lyon DY, Mahendra S, McLaughlin MJ, Lead JR. Nanoma-terials in the environment: Behavior, fate, bioavailability, and effects. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2008; 27 (9): 1825–1851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels SL On the qualities of the air as affected by radiant energies (photocatalytic ionization processes for remediation of indoor environments). J Environ Engineer Sci. 2007; 6 (3): 329-342.
   Google Scholar
• Besov AS, Krivova NA, Vorontsov AV, Zaeva OB, Kozlov DV, Vorozhtsov AB, Parmon VN, Sakovich GV, Komarov VF, Smirniotis PG, Eisenreich N. Air detoxification with nanosize TiO2 aerosol tested on mice. J Hazard Mater. 2010; 173: 40–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han F, Kambala VSR, Srinivasan M, Rajarathnam D, Naidu R. Tailored titanium dioxide photocatalysts for the degradation of organic dyes in wastewater treatment: A review. Appl Catalysis A: Gen. 2009. 359: p. 25–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Z-P, Zhang, C-J. Mechanism and kinetics of Pb(II) adsorp-tion on ultrathin nanocrystalline titania coatings removal of lead from wastewater. J Hazard Mater. 2009; 172: 1082–1086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narr J, Viraraghavan T, Jin Y-C. Applications of nanotechnology in water/wastewater treatment: A Review. Fresnius Environ Bull. 2007; 16 (4): 320–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang JJ, Murr LE, Esquivel EV. Collection and characterization of airborne nanoparticulates. Mater Characterization. 2004; 52 (1): 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murr LE, Esquivel EV, Bang JJ. Characterization of nanostruc-ture phenomena in airborne particulate aggregates and their potential for respiratory health effects. J Mater Sci-Mater in Medicine. 2004; 15 (3): 237–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cass, GR, Hughes LA, Bhave P, Kleeman MJ, Allen JO, Salmon LG. The chemical composition of atmospheric ultrafine parti-cles. Phil Trans Royal Soc A. 2000; 358 (1775) 2581–2592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murr LE, Soto KF, Garza KM, Guerrero PA, Martinez F, Esquivel EV, Ramirez DA, Shi Y, Bang JJ, Venzor J. Combustion-generated nanoparticulates in the El Paso, TX, USA / Juarez, Mexico metroplex: Their comparative characterization and potential for adverse health effects. Inter J Environ Res Pub Health. 2006; 3: 48–66.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berges M, Mohlmann B, Swennen W, Rompaey P, Berghmans P. Workplace exposure characterization Ti02nanoparticle pro-duction. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Nanotechnology, Occupational and Environmental Health. Taipei, Taiwan; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Chen LX, Rajh T, Wang Z, Thurnauer MC. XAFS studies of sur-face structures of TiO2 nanoparticles and photocatalytic reduc-tion of metal ions. J Phys Chem B. 1997; 101 (50): 10688–10697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, HD, Kim SK, Kim SJ. Effect of particle size and phase composition of titanium dioxide nanoparticles on the photo-catalytic properties. J Nanopart Res. 2001; 3(2-3): 141–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung KY, Park SB. Anatase-phase titania-Preparation by embedding silica and photocatalytic activity for the decompo-sition of trichloroethylene. J Photochem Photobiol A-Chem. 1999; 127: 117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox MA, Dulay MT. Heterogeneous photocatalysis. Chem Rev. 1993; 93 (1): 341–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liqiang J, Baifu X, Fulong Y, Baiqi W, Keying S, Weimin C, Honggang E Deactivation and regeneration of ZnO and TiO2 nanoparticles in the gas phase photocatalytic oxidation of n-C7H16 or S02. Appl Catalysis A-Gen. 2004; 275(1-2): 49–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egerton TA, Mattinson JA. Comparison of photooxidation and photoreduction reactions on TiO2 nanoparticles. J Photochem Photobiol A-Chem. 2007; 186(2-3): 115–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams DS, Shukla MK, Ross J. Particulate matter emission by a vehicle running on unpaved road. Atmos Environ. 2008; 42 (16) : 3899–3905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chianelli RR, Ydcaman MJ, Arenas J, Aldape E Atmospheric nanoparticles in photocatalytic and thermal production of atmospheric pollutants. J Hazard Sub Res. 1998; 1: 1.
   Google Scholar
• Murr LE, Bang JJ, Lopez DA, Guerrero PA, Esquivel EV, Choudhuri AR, Subramanya M, Morandi M, Holian A. Carbon nanotubes and nanocrystals in methane combustion and the environmental implications. J Mater Sci. 2004; 39 (6): 2199–2204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang JJ, Guerrero PA, Lopez DA, Murr LE, Esquivel EV. Carbon nanotubes and other fullerene nanocrystals in domes-tic propane and natural gas combustion streams. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2004; 4 (7): 716–718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helland A, Scheringer M, Siegrist M, Kastenholz HG, Wiek A, Scholz RW. Risk assessment of engineered nanomaterials: A survey of industrial approaches. Environ Sci Technol. 2008; 42 (2): 640–646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langa F, Nierengarten J-F, Eds. Fullerenes: Principles and applications. Cambridge, UK: Royal Society of Chemistry; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Quadros ME, Marr LC. Environmental and human health risks of airborne silver nanoparticles. J Air Waste Manage Assoc. 2010; 60 (7): 770–781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wick P, Manser P, Limbach LK, Dettlaff-Weglikowska U, Krumeich F, Roth S, Stark WJ, Bruinink A. The degree and kind of agglomeration affect carbon nanotube cytotoxicity. Toxicol Lett. 2007; 168 (2): 121–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krusic PJ, Wasserman E, Keizer PN, Morton JR, Preston KF. Radical reactions of C60. Science. 1991; 254: 1183-1185.
   Google Scholar
• Markus A, Nairz 0, Voss-Andreae J, Keller C, van der Zouw G, Zeilinger A. Wave-particle duality of C60. Nature. 1999; 401: 680–682.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murr LE, Bang JJ, Esquivel EV, Guerrero PA, Lopez A. Carbon nanotubes, nanocrystal forms, and complex nanoparticle aggregates in common fuel-gas combustion sources and the ambient air. J Nanopart Res. 2004; 6(2-3): 241–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson K, Aitken R, Tran L, Stone V, Duffin R, Forrest G, Alexander A. Carbon nanotubes: A review of their properties in relation to pulmonary toxicology and workplace safety. Tox-icol Sci. 2006; 92 (1): 5–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu YJ, Li J.Q. The interaction of N-2 with active sites of a single-wall carbon nanotube. Chem Phys Lett. 2005; 412(4-6): 439–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulbricht H, Moos G, Hertel T. Interaction of molecular oxygen with single-wall carbon nanotube bundles and graphite. Sur-face Sci. 2003; 532: 852–856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldoni A, Larciprete R, Petaccia L, Lizzit S. Single-wall carbon nanotube interaction with gases: Sample contaminants and environmental monitoring. J Amer Chem Soc. 2003; 125 (37): 11329–11333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chibante LPF, Heymann D. On the geochemistry of fullerenes-stability of C60 in ambient air and the role of ozone. Geochimica Et Cosmochimica Acta. 1993; 57: 1879-1881.
   Google Scholar
• Scanlon JC, Brown JM, Ebert LB. Oxidative stability of fullerenes. J Phys Chem. 1994; 98: 3921–3923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cataldo, E Ozone reaction with carbon nanostructures 1: Reac-tion between solid G60 and G70 fullerenes and ozone. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2007; 7: 1439-1445.
   Google Scholar
• Watanabe H, Matsui E, Ishiyama Y, Senna M. Solvent free mechanochemical oxygenation of fullerene under oxygen atmosphere. Tetrahed Lett. 2007; 48: 8132–8137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theron J, Walker JA, Cloete TE. nanotechnology and water treatment: Applications and emerging opportunities. Grid Rev Microbiol. 2008; 34: 43–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Health Canada. A review of chemical additives present in diesel fuels used in Canada and the United States of America. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Miller A, Ahlstrand G, Kittelson D, Zachariah M. The fate of metal (Fe) during diesel combustion: Morphology, chemistry, and formation pathways of nanoparticles. Combust and Flame. 2007; 149(1-2): 129–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee D, Miller A, Kittelson D, Zachariah MR. Characterization of metal-bearing diesel nanoparticles using single-particle mass spectrometry. J Aero Sci. 2006; 37 (1): 88–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Megaridis CM. Soot suppression by ferrocene in lam-inar ethylene/air nonpremixed flames. Combust and Flame. 1996; 105 (4): 528–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard AD, Ku BK, Emery M, Stolzenburg M, McMurry PH. Measuring particle size-dependent physicochemical structure in airborne single walled carbon nanotube agglomerates. J Nanopart Res. 2007; 9 (1): 85–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keenan CR, Goth-Goldstein R, Lucas D, Sedlak DL. Oxidative stress induced by zero-valent iron nanoparticles and Fe(II) in human bronchial epithelial cells. Environ Sci Technol. 2009; 43 (12) : 4555–4560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keenan CR, Sedlak DL. Ligand-enhanced reactive oxidant gen-eration by nanoparticulate zero-valent iron and oxygen. Envi-ron Sci Technol. 2008; 42 (18): 6936–6941.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auffan M, Achouak W, Rose J, Roncato M-A, Chaneac C, Waite DT, Masion A, Woicik JC, Wiesner WR, Bottero JY. Relation between the redox state of iron-based nanoparticles and their cytotoxicity toward Escherichia coll. Environ Sci Technol. 2008; 42 (17) : 6730–6735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolaymat TM, El Badawy AM, Genaidy A, Scheckel KG, Luxton TP, Suidan M. An evidence-based environmental perspective of manufactured silver nanoparticle in syntheses and applications: A systematic review and critical appraisal of peer-reviewed sci-entific papers. Sci Total Environ. 2010; 408: 999–1006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luoma S N. Silver nanotechnologies and the environment: Old problems or new challenges? Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars; 2008
   Google Scholar
• El Badawy AM, Luxton TP, Silva RG, Scheckel KG, Suidan MT, Tolaymat TM. Impact of environmental conditions (pH, ionic strength, and electrolyte type) on the surface charge and aggregation of silver nanoparticles suspensions. Environ Sci Technol. 2010; 44 (4): 1260–1266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, WG, Wang J, Mertler M, Sachweh B, Fissan H, Pui DYH. Structural properties of silver nanoparticle agglomerates based on transmission electron microscopy: Relationship to particle mobility analysis. J Nanopart Res. 2009; 11 (1): 163–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon MD, Lopez R, Meyer III HM, Feldman LC, HaglundJrRF. Rapid tarnishing of silver nanoparticles in ambient labo-ratory air. Appl Phys B: Lasers and Optics. 2005; 80 (7): 915–921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobias HJ, Beving DE, Ziemann PJ, Sakurai H, Zuk M, McMurry PH, Zarling D, Waytulonis R, Kittelson DB. Chemical analysis of diesel engine nanoparticles using a nano-DMA/ thermal desorption particle beam mass spectrometer. Environ Sci Technol. 2001; 35 (11): 2233–2243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi JP, Harrison RM. Investigation of ultrafine particle forma-tion during diesel exhaust dilution. Environ Sci Technol. 1999; 33 (21) : 3730–3736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi JP, Mark D, Harrison RM. Characterization of particles from a current technology heavy-duty diesel engine. Environ Sci Technol. 2000; 34 (5): 748–755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters TM, They S, Johnson R, Park H, Grassian VH, Maher T,O'Shaughnessy PT. Airborne monitoring to distinguish engi-neered nanomaterials from incidental particles for environmen-tal health and safety. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2009; 6 (2): 73–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burdett GJ, Rood AP. Membrane-filter, direct-transfer tech-nique for the analysis of asbestos fibers or other inorganic par- tides by transmission electron microscopy. Environ Sci Tech-nol. 1983; 17 (11): 643–648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han JH, Lee EJ, Lee JH, So KP, Lee YH, Bae GN, Lee S-B, Ji JH,Cho MH, Yu IJ. Monitoring multiwalled carbon nanotube exposure in carbon nanotube research facility. Inhal Toxicol. 2008; 20 (8): 741–749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). NIOSH Methods 7402: Asbestos by TEM. [Internet]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2003-154/pdfs/7402.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Park B, Donaldson K, Duffin R, Tran L, Kelly F, Mudway I, Morin J-P, Guest R, Jenkinson P, Samaras Z, Giannouli M, Kouridis H, Martin P. Hazard and risk assessment of a nanopar-ticulate cerium oxide-based diesel fuel additive - A case study. Inhal Toxicol. 2008; 20 (6): 547–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang J, Akin D, Lim KS, Broyles S, Ladisch MR, Bashir R. Cap-ture of airborne nanoparticles in swirling flows using non-uni-form electrostatic fields for bio-sensor applications. Sensors and Actuators B-Chem. 2007; 121 (2): 560–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl A, Gharibi A, Swietlicki E, Gudmundsson A, Bohgard M, Ljungman A, Blomqvist G, Gustafsson M. Traffic-generated emissions of ultrafine particles from pavement-tire interface. Atmos Environ. 2006; 40 (7): 1314–1323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ku BK, Maynard AD. Generation and investigation of airborne silver nanoparticles with specific size and morphology by homogeneous nucleation, coagulation and sintering. J Aero Sci. 2006; 37 (4): 452–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegmann K, Scherrer L, Siegmann HC. Physical and chemical properties of airborne nanoscale particles and how to measure the impact on human health. J Mol Struct-Theochem. 1999; 458(1-2): 191–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian ZQ, Siegmann K, Keller A, Matter U, Scherrer L, Sieg-mann HC. Nanoparticle air pollution in major cities and its origin. Atmos Environ. 2000; 34 (3): 443–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murr LE, Soto KF. A TEM study of soot, carbon nanotubes, and related fullerene nanopolyhedra in common fuel-gas combus-tion sources. Mater Characterization. 2005; 55 (1): 50–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murr LE, Soto KF, Esquivel EV, Bang JJ, Guerrero PA, Lopez DA, Ramirez DA. Carbon nanotubes and other fullerene-related nanocrystals in the environment: A TEM study. J Mater Sci. 2004; 56 (6): 28–31.
   Google Scholar
• Fang GC, Wu YS, Wen CC, Lin GK, Huang SH, Rau JY, Lin CP. Concentrations of nano and related ambient air pollutants at a traffic sampling site. Toxicol Ind Health. 2005; 21 (10): 259–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grose M, Sakurai H, Savstrom J, Stolzenburg MR, Watts WF, Morgan CG, Murray IP, Twigg NW, Kittelson DB, McMurry PH. Chemical and physical properties of ultrafine diesel exhaust particles sampled downstream of a catalytic trap. Environ Sci Technol. 2006; 40 (17): 5502–5507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ntziachristos L, Ning Z, Geller MD, Sheesley RJ, Schauer JJ, Sioutas C. Fine, ultrafine and nanoparticle trace element compositions near a major freeway with a high heavy-duty diesel fraction. Atmos Environ. 2007; 41 (27): 5684–5696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fushimi A, Hasegawa S, Takahashi K, Fujitani Y, Tanabe K, Kobayashi S. Atmospheric fate of nuclei-mode particles esti-mated from the number concentrations and chemical compo-sition of particles measured at roadside and background sites. Atmos Environ. 2008; 42 (5): 949–959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujitani Y, Kobayashi T. Measurement of aerosols in engi-neered nanomaterials factories for risk assessment. Nano. 2008; 3 (4): 245–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen BT, Cheng YS, Yeh HC, Bechtold WE, Finch GL. Tests of the size resolution and sizing accuracy of the Lovelace parallel flow diffusion battery. Amer Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1991; 52 (2): 75–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng YS, Yeh HC. Analysis of screen diffusion battery data. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1984; 45: 556–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng YS, Yeh HC, Newton GJ. Sampling in tandem with other instruments. In: LodgeJPJr and Chan TL, eds. Cascade impactor: Sampling and analysis. Akron, OH: American Indus-trial Hygiene Association; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Barr EB, Cheng YS, Yeh HC, Wolff RK. Size characterization of carbonaceous particles using a Lovelace multijet cascade impactor/parallel-flow diffusion battery serial sampling train. Aero Sci Technol. 1989; 10: 1205–1212.
   Google Scholar
• Shi JP, Evans DE, Khan AA, Harrison RM. Sources and concentration of nanoparticles ( 10 nm diameter) in the urban atmosphere. Atmos Environ. 2001; 35 (7): 1193–1202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minoura H, Takekawa H. Observation of number concentrations of atmospheric aerosols and analysis of nanoparticle behavior at an urban background area in Japan. Atmos Envi-ron. 2005; 39 (32): 5806–5816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson JG, Chow JC, Lowenthal DH, Kreisberg NM, Hering SV, Stolzenburg MR. Variations of nanoparticle concentrations at the Fresno Supersite. Sci Total Environ. 2006; 358(1-3): 178–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeganeh B, Kull CM, Hull MS, Marr LC. Characterization of airborne particles during production of carbonaceous nano-materials. Environ Sci Technol. 2008; 42 (12): 4600–4606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson MZ, Kittelson DB, Watts WF. Enhanced coagulation due to evaporation and its effect on nanoparticle evolution. Environ Sci Technol. 2005; 39 (24): 9486–9492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charron A, Harrison RM. Primary particle formation from vehicle emissions during exhaust dilution in the roadside atmosphere. Atmos Environ. 2003; 37 (29): 4109–4119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramotnev DK, Gramotnev G. A new mechanism of aerosol evolution near a busy road: Fragmentation of nanoparticles. J Aero Sci. 2005; 36 (3): 323–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathis U, Kaegi R, Mohr M, Zenobi R. TEM analysis of volatile nanoparticles from particle trap equipped diesel and directinjection spark-ignition vehicles. Atmos Environ. 2004; 38 (26): 4347–4355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson JG, Chow JC, Park K, Lowenthal DH. Nanoparticle and ultrafine particle events at the Fresno Supersite. J Air Waste Manage Assoc. 2006; 56 (4): 417–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins KJ, Jung H, Kittelson DR, Roberts JT, Zachariah MR. Kinetics of diesel nanoparticle oxidation. Environ Sci Technol. 2003; 37 (9): 1949–1954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao B, Yang Z, Wang J, Johnston MV, Wang H. Analysis of soot nanoparticles in a laminar premixed ethylene flame by scan-ning mobility particle sizer. Aero Sci Technol. 2003; 37 (8): 611–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). EPA Federal Test Procedure (FTP). [Internet, accessed 2010 July]. Available from: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/standards/light-duty/ftp.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Lam CW, James JT, McCluskey R, Hunter RL. Pulmonary toxi-city of single-wall carbon nanotubes in mice 7 and 90 days after intratracheal instillation. Toxicol Sci. 2004; 77 (1): 126–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow JC, Watson JG, Crow D, Lowenthal DH, Merrifield T. Comparison of IMPROVE and NIOSH carbon measurements. Aero Sci Technol. 2001; 34 (1): 23–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okazaki T, Saito T, Matsuura K, Ohshima S, Yumura M, Iijima S. Photoluminescence mapping of “as-grown” single-walled carbon nanotubes: A comparison with micelle-encapsulated nanotube solutions. Nano Lett. 2005; 5 (12): 2618–2623.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okazaki T, Saito T, Matsuura K, Ohshima S, Yumura M, Oyama Y, Saito R, Iijima S. Photoluminescence and population analy-sis of single-walled carbon nanotubes produced by CVD and pulsed-laser vaporization methods. Chem Phys Lett. 2006; 420 (4-6) : 286–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones M, Engtrakul C, Metzger WK, Ellingson RJ, Nozik AJ, Heben MJ, Rumbles G. Analysis of photoluminescence from solubilized single-walled carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev B. 2005; 71 (11).
   Google Scholar
• Jones M, Metzger WK, McDonald TJ, Engtrakul C, Ellingson RJ, Rumbles G, Heben MJ. Extrinsic and intrinsic effects on the excited-state kinetics of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett. 2007; 7 (2): 300–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tantra R, Cumpson P. The detection of airborne carbon nan-otubes in relation to toxicology and workplace safety. Nan-otoxicol. 2007; 1 (4): 251–265.
   Google Scholar
• Majestic BJ, Shafer MM. EXAFS spectroscopy of platinum in diesel exhaust particles. Unpublished data, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Spence JCH. High-resolution electron microscopy. 3rd ed. Monographs on the physics and chemistry of materials. New York, NY,: Oxford University Press; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Wang SY, Zordan CA, Johnston MV. Chemical characterization of individual, airborne sub-10-nm particles and molecules. Anal Chem. 2006; 78 (6): 1750–1754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang R, Crozier PA, Sharma R. Structural transformation in ceria nanoparticles during redox processes. J Phys Chem C. 2009; 113 (14): 5700–5704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amelinckx S, Lucas A, Lambin P. Electron diffraction and microscopy of nanotubes. Rep on Prog in Phys. 1999; 62 (11): 1471–1524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biro LP, Gyulai J, Lambin P, Nagy JB, Lazarescu S, Mark GI, Fonseca A, Surján PR, Szekeres Z, Thiry PA, Lucas AA. Scan-ning tunneling microscopy (STM) imaging of carbon nan-otubes. Carbon. 1998; 36(5-6): 689–696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsang SC, de Oliveira P, Davis JJ, Green MLH, Hill HAO. The structure of the carbon nanotube and its surface topography probed by transmission electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy. Chem Phys Lett. 1996; 249(5-6): 413–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Yang M, Ozkan M, Ozkan CS. Magnetic force microscopy of iron oxide nanoparticles and their cellular uptake. Biotechnol Prog. 2009; 25 (4): 923–928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volodin A, Ahlskog M, Seynaeve E, Van Haesendonck C, Fon-seca A, Nagy JB. Imaging the elastic properties of coiled carbon nanotubes with atomic force microscopy. Phys Rev Lett. 2000; 84 (15): 3342–3345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singjai P, Songmee N, Tunkasiri T, Vilaithong T. Atomic force microscopy imaging and cutting of beaded carbon nanotubes deposited on glass. Surface Interface Anal. 2002; 33(10-11): 900–904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston MV, Wang SY, Reinard MS. Nanoparticle mass spec-trometry: Pushing the limit of single particle analysis. Appl Spectrosc. 2006; 60 (10): 264A-272A.
   Google Scholar
• Zordan CA, Wang S, Johnston MV. Time-resolved chemical composition of individual nanoparticles in urban air. Environ Sci Technol. 2008; 42 (17): 6631–6636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang SY, Johnston MV. Airborne nanoparticle characteriza-tion with a digital ion trap-reflection time of flight mass spec-trometer. Intern J Mass Spect. 2006; 258(1-3): 50–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith JN, Dunn MJ, VanReken TM, Iida K, Stolzenburg MR, McMurry PH, Huey LR. Chemical composition of atmospheric nanoparticles formed from nucleation in Tecamac, Mexico: Evidence for an important role for organic species in nanopar-tide growth. Geophys Res Lett. 2008; 35: L04808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes LS, Cass GR, Gone J, Ames M, Olmez I. Physical and chemical characterization of atmospheric ultrafine particles in the Los Angeles area. Environ Sci Technol. 1998; 32 (9): 1153–1161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu S, Polidori A, Arhami M, Shafer MM, Schauer JJ, Cho A, Sioutas C. Redox activity and chemical speciation of size frac-tioned PM in the communities of the Los Angeles-Long Beach Harbor. Atmos Chem Phys. 2008; 8 (21): 6439–6451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fryzek JP, Chadda B, Marano D, White K, Schweitzer S, McLaughlin JK, Blot, WJ. A cohort mortality study among tita-nium dioxide manufacturing workers in the United States. J Occup Environ Med. 2003; 45 (4): 400–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murr LE, Bang JJ. Electron microscope comparisons of fine and ultra-fine carbonaceous and non-carbonaceous, airborne particulates. Atmos Environ. 2003; 37 (34): 4795–4806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posfai M, Anderson JR, Buseck PR, Sievering H. Soot and sul-fate aerosol particles in the remote marine troposphere. J Geo-phys Res Atmos. 1999; 104(D17): 21685–21693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow JC, Watson JG, Edgerton SA, Vega E. Chemical composi-tion of PM2.5 and PM10 in Mexico City during Winter 1997. Sci Total Environ. 2002; 287 (3): 177–201.
   Google Scholar
• Lee S-H, Murphy DM, Thomson DS, Middlebrook AM. Chem-ical components of single particles measured with particle analysis by laser mass spectrometry (PALMS) during the Atlanta Supersite Project: Focus on organic/sulfate, lead, soot, and mineral particles. J Geophys Res. 2002; 107(D1-D2): 4003.
   Google Scholar
• Maynard AD, Kuempel ED. Airborne nanostructured particles and occupational health. J of Nanopart Res. 2005; 7 (6): 587–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ono-Ogasawara M, Serita F, Takaya M. Distinguishing nanoma-terial particles from background airborne particulate matter for quantitative exposure assessment. J Nanopart Res. 2009; 11 (7): 1651–1659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai S-J, Hofmann M, Hallock M, Ada E, Kong J, Ellenbecker M. Characterization and evaluation of nanoparticle release during the synthesis of single-walled and multiwalled carbon nanotubes by chemical vapor deposition. Environ Sci Technol. 2009; 43: 6017–6023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar