The Rose Theatre: Twenty Years of Continuous Monitoring, Lessons, and Legacy

Bibliography

• Ashurst J, Balaam N, Foley K. 1989. The Rose Theatre. Conservation Bulletin, 9: 9–10.
   Google Scholar
• Biddle M. 1989. The Rose Reviewed: A Comedy (?) of Errors. Antiquity, 63: 753–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biddle M. 1994. What Future for British Archaeology. In: Eighth Annual Conference of the Institute for Field Archaeologists, Bradford, 13–15 April 1994, Archaeology In Britain Conference, Oxford. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 4–6.
   Google Scholar
• Bowsher J, Miller P. 2009. The Rose and the Globe Playhouses of Shakespeare’s Bankside, Southwark, excavations 1988–1990. MOLA Monograph 48. London: Museum of London Archaeology.
   Google Scholar
• Burch R. ed. 2004. Selected Papers from the Colloquium ‘Reburial of Archaeological Sites’. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites, 6 (3&4): 133–399.
   Google Scholar
• Canti M, Davis M. 1999. Tests and Guidelines for the Suitability of Sands to be Used in Archaeological Site Reburial. Journal of Archaeological Science, 26: 775–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chippendale C. 1989. Editorial. Antiquity, 63: 411–13.
   Google Scholar
• Corfield MC. 1993. Monitoring the Condition of Wet Archaeological Sites. In: P. Hoffmann, ed. Proceedings of the 5th ICOM Group on Wet Organic Archaeological Materials Conference. Bremerhaven: Portland Maine, pp. 423–36.
   Google Scholar
• Corfield M. 1996. Preventive Conservation for Archaeological Sites. Preprints of the contributions to the Copenhagen Congress, 26–30 August 1996: Archaeological Conservation and its Consequences, pp. 32–37.
   Google Scholar
• Corfield M. 2004. Saving the Rose Theatre: England’s First Managed and Monitored Site. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites, 6 (3&4): 305–14.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe, 1992. European Convention on the Protection of the Archaeological Heritage (Revised), Valetta.
   Google Scholar
• Darvill T, Fulton A. 1995. The Monuments at Risk Survey of England. London: English Heritage.
   Google Scholar
• Davis M, Gdaniac K, Brice M, White L. 2004. Mitigation of Construction Impact on Archaeological Remains. London: Museum of London Archaeological Service.
   Google Scholar
• French C, Taylor M. 1985. Desiccation and Destruction. Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 4 (2): 139–56.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes R, Coles B, Henley R, Seaman J, Butler J, Lawrence A, Patel D, Dillon J, McKinley J, Sheilds H. 2004. Design and Decision on Five Development Sites in London: Governor’s House, Millenium Footbridge, Alder Castle, Plantation Place and Park Lane, Croydon. In: Preserving Archaeological Remains in Situ Proceedings of the Second Conference, 12–14 September 2001. London: Museum of London Archaeologi- cal Service, pp. 98–136.
   Google Scholar
• Huismann DJ. 2009. Degradation of Archaeological Remains. Den Haag: Sdu Uitgevers b.v.
   Google Scholar
• Huntings Land and Environment, 1994. Investigation of site conditions and repair and replacement of monitoring points. Huntings Report R898: HER-07 to English Heritage.
   Google Scholar
• Nickens PR. ed. 1991. Perspectives on Archeological Site Protection and Preservation. Technical Report EL-91–6, Waterways Experiment Station. Vicksburg, Mississippi: US Army Corps of Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Orrell J, Gurr A. 1989. What the Rose Can Tell Us. Antiquity, 63: 421–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ove Arup & Partners and the Department of Archaeology, University of York, in association with B. Thorpe, 1991. York Development and Archaeology, Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• Powell KL, Pedley S, Corfield M. 2000. The Effect of Water Quality upon the Integrity of Buried Archaeological Wood. In: Proceedings of the Archaeological Sciences Conference, Durham, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Riksantikvaren og Norsk Institutt for Kulturminneforskning, n.d. The Monitoring Manual, Procedures & Guidelines for the Monitoring, Recording and Preservation/Management of Urban Archaeological Deposits. Riksantikvaren and Norsk Institutt for Kulturminneforskning.
   Google Scholar
• Smit S, van Heeringen RM, Theunissen EM. 2006. Archaeological Monitoring, Standard Guidelines for the Non Destructive Recording and Monitoring of the Physical Quality of Archaeological Sites and Monuments. Nederlandse Archeologische Rapporten (NAR) 33. Amersfoort: National Service for Archaeology, Cultural Landscape and Built Heritage.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly C. 1989. Excavation as Theatre. Antiquity, 63: 275–80.
   Google Scholar
• van Heeringen RM, Mauro GV, Smit A. eds. 2004. A Pilot Study on the Monitoring of the Physical Quality of Three Archaeological Sites at the UNESCO World Heritage Site at Schokland, Province of Flevoland, The Netherlands. Amersfoort: Nederlandse Archaeologische Rapporten 26, ROB.
   Google Scholar
• van Heeringen RM, Theusnissen EM. 2002. Desiccation of the Archaeological Landscape at Voorne- Putten. Amersfoort: Nederlandse Archaeologische Rapporten 25, ROB.
   Google Scholar
• Wainwright G. 1989. Saving the Rose. Antiquity, 63: 430–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams J, Sidell J, Panter I. 2007. Piling and Archaeology, An English Heritage Guidance Note. English Heritage.
   Google Scholar