Is Preservation In Situ an Unacceptable Option for Development Control? Can Monitoring Prove the Continued Preservation of Waterlogged Deposits?

Bibliography

• Boreham S. 2007. Stratigraphy, Physical and Chemical Analyses from Bronze Age sediments at Must Farm, Whittlesey, Peterborough. Unpublished assessment report for Cambridge Archaeological Unit and Hanson Building Products.
   Google Scholar
• British Standards Institute, 1990. BS1377. Methods of Test for Soils for Engineering Purposes. Part 3. Chemical and Electro-Chemical Tests. BSI London.
   Google Scholar
• British Standards Institute, 1999. BS5930. The Code of Practice for Site Investigations. Annex F. BSI. London.
   Google Scholar
• Cheetham J. 2007. An Assessment of the Potential for In-Situ Preservation of buried Organic Archaeological Remains at Sutton Common, South Yorkshire: PhD thesis, University of Hull. (2004) [online] [accessed 3 February 2012]. Available at: <doi: 10·5284/1000272>.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Communities and Local Government, 2010. Planning Policy Statement 5 Planning and the Historic Environment [accessed 3 February 2012]. Available at: <http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/planningandbuilding/pps5>.
   Google Scholar
• Department of the Environment, 1990. Planning Policy Guidance 16: Archaeology and Planning [accessed 3 February 2012]. Available at: <http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/planningandbuilding/pdf/156777. pdf>.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan DV. 1998. Environmental Investigations at Shinewater Park, East Sussex. Wetland Ecosystem Research Group Report No. 22.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan DV. 2001 Environmental Investigations at Shinewater Park, East Sussex 1999–2000. Wetland Ecosystem Research Group Report.
   Google Scholar
• Holden J, Howard AJ, West LJ, Maxfield E, Panter I, Oxley J. 2009. A Critical Review of Hydrological Data Collection Schemes for Assessing Preservation Risk for Urban Waterlogged Archaeology: A Case Study from the City of York, UK. Journal of Environmental Management.
   Google Scholar
• Matthiesen H, Gregory D, Jensen P, Sorensen B. 2004. Environmental Monitoring at Nydam, a Waterlogged Site with Weapon Sacrifices from the Danish Iron Age. A Comparison of Methods Used and Results from Undisturbed Deposits. Journal of Wetland Archaeology, 4: 55–74.
   Google Scholar
• Matthiesen H. 2008. Detailed Chemical Analyses of Groundwater as a Tool for Monitoring Urban Archaeo- logical Deposits: Results from Bryggen in Bergen. Journal of Archaeological Science, 35: 1378–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SLR, 2007. Must Farm Timber Platform Baseline Testing and Monitoring Regime Method Statement. Unpublished report for Hanson Heidleberg Cement.
   Google Scholar
• Smit A, van Heeringen RM, Theunissen EM. 2006. Archaeological Monitoring Standard. Guidelines for the Non-Destructive Recording and Monitoring of the Physical Quality of Archaeological Sites and Monu- ments. Nederlandse Archaeologische Rapporten 33.
   Google Scholar
• Riksantikvaren and NIKU, n.d. The Monitoring Manual. Procedures & Guidelines for the Monitoring, Recording and Preservation/Management of Urban Archaeological Deposit [online] [accessed 3 February 2012]. Available at: <www.riksantikvaren.no/filestore/Veileder_komp.pdf>.
   Google Scholar
• Malim T, Panter I, Carrott J. 2009. Nantwich Waterlogged Deposits. Report No. 2. The Character and Extent of Archaeological Preservation. Unpublished report for Cheshire County Council and English Heritage (Project Number 3839 MAIN).
   Google Scholar
• SLR, 2010. Nantwich Waterlogged Deposits. Report No. 3. Management Strategy: Supplementary Planning Documents for the Historic Environment and Archaeological Deposits. Unpublished report for Cheshire County Council and English Heritage.
   Google Scholar
• Williams J, Fell V, Graham K, Simpson P, Collins M, Koon H, Griffen R. 2008a. Re-watering of the Iron Age Causeway at Fiskerton, England. In: , Kars H, van Heeringen R M, eds. Preserving Archaeo- logical Remains In Situ. Proceedings of the 3rd Conference 7–9 December 2006, Amsterdam. Geoarchaeological and Bioarchaological Studies 10 Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Williams J, Martin-Bacon H, Onions B, Barrett D, Richmond A, Page M. 2008b. The Second Shardlow Boat — Economic Drivers or Heritage Policy? In: , Kars H, van Heeringen R M, eds. Preserving Archaeo- logical Remains In Situ. Proceedings of the 3rd Conference 7–9 December 2006, Amsterdam. Geoarchaeological and Bioarchaological Studies 10 Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar