61
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Papers

The Predictive Power of Optimality Theory for Phonological Treatment

Pages 239-249 | Published online: 29 Nov 2013

References

  • Barlow, J. A., & Gierut, J. A. (1999). Optimality theory in phonological acquisition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42(6), 1482–1498.
  • Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.
  • de Lacy, P. (2006). Markedness: Reduction and preservation in phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dinnsen, D. A. (2002). A reconsideration of children's phonological representations. In B. Skarabela, S. Fish, & A. H. J. Do (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 1–23). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
  • Dinnsen, D. A. (2008a). Fundamentals of optimality theory. In D. A. Dinnsen &J. A. Gierut (Eds.), Optimality theory, phonological acquisition and disorders (pp. 3–36). London: Equinox Publishing Ltd.
  • Dinnsen, D. A. (2008b). Recalcitrant error patterns. In D. A. Dinnsen & J. A. Gierut (Eds.), Optimality theory, phonological acquisition and disorders (pp. 247–276). London: Equinox Publishing Ltd.
  • Dinnsen, D. A., & Farris-Trimble, A. W. (2008). The prominence paradox. In D. A. Dinnsen & J. A. Gierut (Eds.), Optimality theory, phonological acquisition and disorders (pp. 277–308). London: Equinox Publishing Ltd.
  • Dinnsen, D. A., & Gierut, J. A. (2008). Optimality theory: A clinical perspective. In M. J. Ball, M. Perkins, N. Muller, & S. Howard (Eds.), Hand-book of clinical linguistics (pp. 439–451). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
  • Dinnsen, D. A., & O'Connor, K. M. (2001). Implicationally related error patterns and the selection of treatment targets. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 32(4), 257–270.
  • Gierut, J. A. (2008a). Fundamentals of experimental design and treatment. In D. A. Dinnsen & J. A. Gierut (Eds.), Optimality theory, phonological acquisition and disorders (pp. 93–118). London: Equinox Publishing Ltd.
  • Gierut, J. A. (2008b). Phonological disorders and the Developmental Phonology Archive. In D. A. Dinnsen & J. A. Gierut (Eds.), Optimality theory, phonological acquisition and disorders (pp. 37–92). London: Equinox Publish-ing Ltd.
  • Gierut, J. A., & Morrisette, M. L. (2005). The clinical significance of optimality theory for phonological disorders. Topics in Language Disorders, 25(3), 266–279.
  • Goldman, R., & Fristoe, M. (1986). Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
  • Kiparsky, P. (1994, January). Remarks on markedness. Paper presented at the Tr-Lateral Phonology Weekend 2, Santa Cruz, CA.
  • Macken, M. A. (1978). Permitted complexity in phonological development: One child's ac-quisition of Spanish consonants. Lingua, 44(2-3), 219–253.
  • Maddieson, I. (1984). Patterns of sounds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Pater, J., & Barlow, J. A. (2003). Constraint conflict in cluster reduction. Journal of Child Language, 30(3), 487–526.
  • Pater, J., & Werle, A. (2001). Typology and variation in child consonant harmony. In C. Fery, A. Green, & R. van de Vijver (Eds.), Proceedings of HILP 5 (pp. 119–139). Potsdam: Uni-versity of Potsdam.
  • Prince, A., & Smolensky, P. ( 1993/2004). optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Smit, A. B. (1993). Phonologic error distributions in the Iowa-Nebraska Articulation Norms Project: Consonant singletons. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36(3), 533–547.
  • Smolensky, P. (1996). The initial state and "richness of the base" in optimality theory (Tech. Rep. No. JHU-CogSci-96-4). Baltimore: Department of Cognitive Science, Johns Hop-kins University.
  • Stemberger, J. P., & Stoel-Gammon, C. (1991). The underspecification of coronals: Evidence from language acquisition and performance errors. In C. Paradis &J-F. Prunet ( Eds.), Phonetics and phonology, Vol. 2: The special status of coronals (pp. 181–199). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Stoel-Gammon, C., & Stemberger, J. P. (1994). Consonant harmony and phonological underspecification in child speech. In M. Yavas (Ed.), First and second language phonology (pp. 63–80). San Diego, CA: Singular.
  • Tesar, B., & Smolensky, P. (1998). Learnability in optimality theory. Linguistic Inquiry, 29(2), 229–268.
  • Vihman, M. M. (1978). Consonant harmony: Its scope and function in child language. In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of human language 2: Phonology (pp. 281–334). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Vitevitch, M. S., Luce, P. A., Charles-Luce, J., & Kemmerer, D. (1997). Phonotactics and syllable stress: Implications for the processing of spoken nonsense words. Language and Speech, 40(1), 47–62.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.