REFERENCES
- www.cebm.net/levels_of_evidence.asp (updated May 2001; cited 26 2008 October).
- Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG: Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 1995; 273: 408–12.
- Moher D, Pham B, Jones A: Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta‐analyses? Lancet 1998; 352: 609–13.
- Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S: Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. JAMA 1996; 276: 637–39.
- Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG: The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel‐group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med 2001; 134: 657–62.
- Boutron I, Moher D, Altman DG, Schulz KF, Ravaud P: Methods and processes of the CONSORT Group: example of an extension for trials assessing nonpharmacologic treatments. Ann Intern Med 2008; 148: W60–6.
- Campbell MK, Elbourne DR, Altman DG: CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. Br Med J 2004; 328: 702–08.
- Gagnier JJ, Boon H, Rochon P, Moher D, Barnes J, Bombardier C: Reporting randomized, controlled trials of herbal interventions: an elaborated CONSORT statement. Ann Intern Med 2006; 144: 364–67.
- Hopewell S, Clarke M, Moher D: CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts. Lancet 2008; 371: 281–83.
- Ioannidis JP, Evans SJ, Gotzsche PC: Better reporting of harms in randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. Ann Intern Med 2004; 141: 781–88.
- Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Altman DG, Pocock SJ, Evans SJ: Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. JAMA 2006; 295: 1152–60.
- www.consort‐statement.org (updated 25 September 2008; cited 30 October 2008).
- Newcombe RG: Reporting of clinical trials in the JO–the CONSORT Guidelines. J Orthod 2000; 27: 69–70.
- Harrison JE: Clinical trials in orthodontics II: assessment of the quality of reporting of clinical trials published in three orthodontic journals between 1989 and 1998. J Orthod 2003; 30: 309–15.
- Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D: The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 2001; 134: 663–94.
- Agha R, Cooper D, Muir G: The reporting quality of randomised controlled trials in surgery: a systematic review. Int J Surg 2007; 5: 413–22.
- Lai TY, Wong VW, Lam RF, Cheng AC, Lam DS, Leung GM: Quality of reporting of key methodological items of randomized controlled trials in clinical ophthalmic journals. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2007; 14: 390–98.
- Farrokhyar F, Chu R, Whitlock R, Thabane L: A systematic review of the quality of publications reporting coronary artery bypass grafting trials. Can J Surg 2007; 50: 266–77.
- Halpern SH, Darani R, Douglas MJ, Wight W, Yee J: Compliance with the CONSORT checklist in obstetric anaesthesia randomised controlled trials. Int J Obstet Anesth 2004; 13: 207–14.
- Prady SL, Richmond SJ, Morton VM, Macpherson H: A systematic evaluation of the impact of STRICTA and CONSORT recommendations on quality of reporting for acupuncture trials. PLoS ONE 2008; 3: e1577
- Moher D, Jones A, Lepage L: Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: a comparative before‐and‐after evaluation. JAMA 2001; 285: 1992–95.
- Plint AC, Moher D, Morrison A: Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review. Med J Aust 2006; 185: 263–67.
- Boutron I, Moher D, Altman DG, Schulz KF, Ravaud P: Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 2008; 148: 295–309.