Northcroft Lecture: How has the spectrum of orthodontics changed over the past decades?

References

• Burstone CJ, Koenig HA. Creative wire bending — the force system from step and V bends. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988; 93: 59–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menghi C, Planert J, Melsen B. 3-D experimental identification of force systems from orthodontic loops activated for first order corrections. Angle Orthod 1999; 69: 49–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronay F, Kleinert W, Melsen B, Burstone CJ. Force system developed by V bends in an elastic orthodontic wire. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989; 96: 295–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreasen GF, Brady PR. A use hypothesis for 55 Nitinol wire for orthodontics. Angle Orthod 1972; 42: 172–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burstone CJ, Qin B, Morton JY. Chinese NiTi wire — a new orthodontic alloy. Am J Orthod 1985; 87: 445–52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miura F, Mogi M, Okamoto Y. New application of superelastic NiTi rectangular wire. J Clin Orthod 1990; 24: 544–48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Andrews LF. The straight-wire appliance, origin, controversy, commentary. J Clin Orthod 1976; 10: 99–114
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Planche P. L’evaluation des techniques prè-enfermées depuis Andrews. Rev Orthop Denta Faciale 1997; 31: 453–71.
   Google Scholar
• Burstone CJ. The segmented arch approach to space closure. Am J Orthod 1982; 82: 361–78.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dalstra M, Melsen B. Force systems developed by six different cantilever configurations. Clin Orthod Res 1999; 2: 3–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fiorelli G, Melsen B, Modica C. Two-vector mechanics. Prog Orthod 2003; 4: 62–73.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Isaacson RJ, Rebellato J. Two-couple orthodontic appliance systems: torquing arches. Semin Orthod 1995; 1: 31–36.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Isacson RJ, Lindauer SJ, Conley P. Responses of 3-dimensional arch wires to vertical v-bends: comparisons with existing 2-dimensional data in the lateral view. Semin Orthod 1995; 1: 57–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vanderby RJr, Burstone CJ, Solonche DJ, Ratches JA. Experimentally determined force systems from vertically activated orthodontic loops. Angle Orthod 1977; 47: 272–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damon DH. The rationale, evolution and clinical application of the self-ligating bracket. Clin Orthod Res 1998; 1: 52–61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Damon DH. The Damon low-friction bracket: a biologically compatible straight-wire system. J Clin Orthod 1998; 32: 670–80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lagravere MO, Flores-Mir C. The treatment effects of Invisalign orthodontic aligners: a systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc 2005; 136: 1724–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachdeva. Sure-Smile: technology-driven solution for orthodontics. Tex Dent J 2002; 119: 608–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sachdeva RC. SureSmile technology in a patient-centered orthodontic practice. J Clin Orthod 2001; 35: 245–53.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Damon DH. Treatment of the face with biocompatible orthodontics. InTM Graber, Vanarsdall RL, Vig KWL (eds.) Orthodontics current principles and techniques. 4th Edn. St Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby, 2005, 753–831.
   Google Scholar
• Wiechmann D. A new bracket system for lingual orthodontic treatment. Part 2: First clinical experiences and further development. J Orofac Orthop 2003; 64: 372–88.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wiechmann D, Rummel V, Thalheim A, Simon JS, Wiechmann L. Customized brackets and archwires for lingual orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 124: 593–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melsen B. Limitations in adult orthodontics. In B Melsen (ed.). Current controversies in orthodontics. Chicago, IL: Quintessence Publishing Co. Inc., 1991, Chap. 7, 147–180.
   Google Scholar
• Melsen B, Agerbaek N. Orthodontics as an adjunct to rehabilitation. Periodontology 2000 1994; 4: 148–59.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Melsen B, Fiorelli G. Upper molar intrusion. J Clin Orthod 1996; 30: 91–96.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mortensen AA. Lower jaw expansion — using two different self-ligating systems. Proc. 21st Congress of the Nordic Orthodontic Society, Aalborg, Denmark, September 2010, NOS, available at: http://nos2010.dk/abstracts/mortensn.htm
   Google Scholar
• Keim RG, Gottlieb EL, Nelson AH, Vogels DS. III: 2009 JCO Orthodontic Practice Study. Part 1. Trends. J Clin Orthod 2009; 43, 625–34.
   Google Scholar
• Keim RG, Gottlieb EL, Nelson AH, Vogels DS. III: 2009 JCO Orthodontic Practice Study. Part 2. Practice success. J Clin Orthod 2009; 43: 699–707.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keim RG, Gottlieb EL, Nelson AH, Vogels DS. III: 2009 JCO Orthodontic Practice Study. Part 4. Additional breakdowns. J Clin Orthod 2010; 44: 19–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scholz RP, Sarver DM. Interview with an Insignia doctor David M. Sarver. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 136: 853–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burstone CR. Deep overbite correction by intrusion. Am J Orthod 1977; 72: 1–22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Melsen B, Verna C. A rational approach to orthodontic anchorage, Prog Orthod 1999; 1: 10–22.
   Google Scholar
• Melsen B. Mini-implants: where are we? J Clin Orthod 2005; 39: 539–47.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Melsen B, Verna C. Miniscrew implants: the Aarhus Anchorage System. Semin Orthod 2005; 11: 24–31.
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein S. Minimal forces in tooth movement. Am J Orthod 1967; 53: 881–903.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Melsen B, Bosch C. Different approaches to anchorage: a survey and an evaluation, Angle Orthod 1997; 67: 23–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehrbein H; Feifel H, Diedrich P. Palatal implant anchorage reinforcement of posterior teeth: a prospective study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999; 116: 678–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehrbein H, Merz BR, Diedrich P. Palatal bone support for orthodontic implant anchorage — a clinical and radiological study. Eur J Orthod 1999; 21: 65–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts WE, Helm FR, Marshall KJ, Gongloff RK. Rigid endosseous implants for orthodontic and orthopedic anchorage. Angle Orthod 1989; 59: 247–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts WE, Marshall KJ, Mozsary PG. Rigid endosseous implant utilized as anchorage to protract molars and close an atrophic extraction site. Angle Orthod 1990; 60: 135–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa A, Raffainl M, Melsen B. Miniscrews as orthodontic anchorage: a preliminary report. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 1998; 13: 201–09.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kanomi R. Mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage. J Clin Orthod 1997; 31: 763–67.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Janssen KI, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, Sandham A. Skeletal anchorage in orthodontics — a review of various systems in animal and human studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23: 75–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melsen B. What influence has skeletal anchorage had on orthodontics. In JA McNamaraJr (ed.). Microimplants as temporary orthodontic anchorage. Ann Arbor, MI: Needham Press, 2010; 7: 207–228.
   Google Scholar
• Melsen B. Is the intraoral-extradental anchorage changing the spectrum of orthodontics? In JA McNamaraJr (ed.) Implants, microimplants, onplants and transplants: new answers to old questions in orthodontics. 1st Edn.Ann Arbor, MI, University of Michigan, 2004, 41–68.
   Google Scholar
• Melsen B, Dalstra M. Tissue reaction to loading of mini-implants. In JB Cope (ed.).Temporary anchorage devices in orthodontics. Dallas, TX: Under Dog Media, 2005. C47-1–C47-21.
   Google Scholar
• Miethke RR, Melsen B. Adult orthodontics and periodontal diseases — a 9 year review of the literature from 1984–1993. Prakt Kieferorthop 1993; 7: 249–62.
   Google Scholar
• Musich DR. Assessment and description of the treatment needs of adult patients evaluated for orthodontic therapy: characteristics of the solo provider group (I). Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 1986; 1: 55–67.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reitan K. The tissue reaction as related to the functional factor. Dent Rec (London) 1951; 71: 173–83.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reitan K. Clinical and histologic observations on tooth movement during and after orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1967; 53: 721–45.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frost HM. Perspectives: bone’s mechanical usage windows. Bone Miner 1992; 19: 257–71.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cattaneo PM. Orthodontic aspects of bone mechanics and bone remodelling. PhD thesis, Aarhus University, Aarhu, Denmark, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Cattaneo PM, Dalstra M, Melsen B. The finite element method: a tool to study orthodontic tooth movement. J Dent Res 2005; 84: 428–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melsen B, Agerbaek N, Markenstam G. Intrusion of incisors in adult patients with marginal bone loss. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989; 96: 232–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melsen B. Biological reaction of alveolar bone to orthodontic tooth movement. Angle Orthod 1999; 69: 151–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melsen B, Allais D. Factors of importance for the development of dehiscences during labial movement of mandibular incisors: a retrospective study of adult orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 127: 552–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allais D, Melsen B. Does labial movement of lower incisors influence the level of the gingival margin? A case–control study of adult orthodontic patients. Eur J Orthod 2003; 25: 343–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albandar JM. Global risk factors and risk indicators for periodontal diseases. Periodontology 2000 2002; 29: 177–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albandar JM. Periodontal diseases in North America. Periodontology 2000 2002; 29: 31–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindtoft H. Post treatment changes in the clinical crown height and periodontal health occurring following an orthodontic treatment involving proclination of lower incisors. A prospective clinical study in adult orthodontic patients. Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark, 2010.
   Google Scholar