260
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Scientific Section

The association between posterior unilateral crossbite and craniomandibular asymmetry: A systematic review

&
Pages 279-291 | Received 15 Mar 2011, Accepted 28 Jun 2012, Published online: 16 Dec 2014

References

  • Ingervall B, Thilander B. Activity of temporal and masseter muscles in children with a lateral forced bite. Angle Orthod 1975; 45: 249–58.
  • Hamerling K, Naeije C, Myrberg N. Mandibular function in children with a lateral forced bite. Eur J Orthod 1991; 13: 35–42.
  • Behlfelt K, Linder-Aronson S, McWilliam J, Neander P, Laage-Hellman J. Dentition in children with enlarged tonsils compared to control children. Eur J Orthod 1989; 11: 416–29.
  • Hannuksela A, Vaananen A. Predisposing factors for malocclusion in 7-year old children with special reference to atopic diseases. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987; 92: 299–303.
  • Thilander B, Wahlund S, Lennartsson B. The effect of early interceptive treatment in children with posterior crossbite. Eur J Orthod 1984; 6: 25–34.
  • Cheng M-C, Enlow DH, Papsidero M, Broadbent BH, Oyen O, Sabat M. Developmental effect of impaired breathing in the face of the growing child. Angle Orthod 1988; 53: 309–20.
  • Nerder PH, Bakke M, Solow B. The functional shift of the mandible in unilateral posterior crossbite and the adaptation of the temporomandibular joints: a pilot study. Eur J Orthod 1999; 21: 155–66.
  • Woodside DG, Metaxas A, Altuna G. The influence of functional appliance on glenoid fossae remodelling. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987; 92: 181–98.
  • O’Byrn BL, Sadowsky C, Schneider B, BeGole EA. An evaluation of mandibular asymmetry in adults with unilateral posterior crossbite. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995; 107: 394–400.
  • Higgins JPT, Grenn S (eds.). Cochrane textbook for systematic reviews of interventions 4·2·5 (updated May 2005), available at: www.cochrane-handbook.org.
  • Antezak AA, Tang J, Chalmers TC. Quality assessment of randomized control trails in dental research I. Methods. J Periodont Res 1986; 21: 305–14.
  • Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 1996; 17: 1–12.
  • Lam PH, Sadowsky C, Omerza F. Mandibular asymmetry and condylar position in children with unilateral posterior crossbite. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999; 115: 569–75.
  • Schmid W, Mongini F, Felisio A. A computer based assessment of structural and displacement asymmetries of the mandible. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991; 100: 19–34.
  • Pinto AS, Buschang PH, Throckmorton GS, Chen P. Morphological and positional asymmetries of young children with functional unilateral posterior crossbite. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001; 120: 513–20.
  • Kecik D, Kocadereli I, Saatci I. Evaluation of the treatment changes of functional posterior crossbite in the mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 131: 202–15.
  • Langberg BJ, Arai K, Miner RM. Transverse skeletal and dental asymmetry in adults with unilateral lingual posterior crossbite. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 127: 6–15.
  • Hesse KL, Artun J, Joondeph DR, Kennedy DB. Changes in condylar position and occlusion associated with maxillary expansion for correction of functional unilateral posterior crossbite. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997; 111: 410–18.
  • Pirttiniemi P, Kantomaa T, Lahtela P. Relationship between craniofacial and condyle path asymmetry in unilateral cross bite patients. Eur J Orthod 1990; 12: 408–13.
  • Myers DR, Barenie JT, Bell RA, Williamson EH. Condylar position in children with functional posterior crossbites: before and after crossbite correction. Pediatr Dent 1980; 2: 190–94.
  • Mongini F, Schmid W. Treatment of mandibular asymmetries during growth. A longitudinal study. Eur J Orthod 1987; 9: 51–67.
  • Lippold C, Hoppe G, Moiseenko T, Ehmer U. Analysis of condylar differences in Functional unilateral Posterior crossbite during early treatment – a randomized clinical study. J Orofac Orthop 2008; 69: 283–96.
  • Kilic N, Kiki A, Oktay H. Condylar asymmetry in unilateral posterior crossbite patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 133: 382–87.
  • Uysal T, Sisman Y, Kurt G, Romoglu S. Condylar and Ramal vertical asymmetry in unilateral and bilateral posterior crossbite patients and normal occlusion sample. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 136: 37–43.
  • Veli I, Uysal T, Ozer T, Ucar F. Mandibular asymmetry in unilateral and bilateral posterior crossbite patients using cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod 2011; 81: 966–74.
  • Major PW, Johnson DE, Hesse KL, Glover KE. Effect of head orientation on posterior anterior cephalometric landmark identification. Angle Orthod 1996; 66: 51–60.
  • Major PW, Johnson DE, Hesse KL, Glover KE. Landmark indentification error in posterior anterior cephalometrics. Angle Orthod 1994; 64: 447–45.
  • Forsberg C, Burstone C, Hanley K. Diagnosis and treatment planning of skeletal asymmetry with submentalvertex radiographs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1984; 85: 224–37.
  • Kambylafkas P, Murdock E, Gilda E, Tallents RH, Kyrkanides S. Validity of panoramic radiographs for measuring mandibular asymmetry. Angle Orthod 2006; 76: 388–93.
  • White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral Radiology, 5th Edn. St. Louis, MO: Mosby, 2004, 197–98.
  • Pandis N, Karpac J, Trevino R, Williams B. Radiographic study of condylar position at various depths of cut in dry skulls with axially corrected tomograms. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991; 100: 116–22.
  • Pullinger A, Hollender L. Variation in condyle-fossa relationship according to different methods of evaluation in tomograms. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1986; 62: 719–27.
  • Habets LL, Bezuur JN, Naeiji M, Hansson TL. The orthopantomogram, an aid in diagnosis of temporomandibular joint problems. II. The vertical asymmetry. J Oral Rehabil 1988; 15; 465–71.
  • Marmary Y, Zilberman Y, Mirsky Y. Use of foramina spinosa to determine skull midlines. Angle Orthod 1979; 49: 263–68.
  • Crawford SD. Condylar axis position as determined by the occlusion and measured by the CPI instrument, signs and symptoms of temperomandibular joint dysfunction. Angle Orthod 1999; 69: 103–16.
  • Alexander SR, Moore RN, Dubois LM. Mandibular condylar position, comparison of articular mountings and magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993; 104: 230–39.
  • Schlueter BA. Cone beam computed tomography three dimensional reconstruction for evaluation of the mandibular condyle (thesis). St. Louis, MO: Saint Louis university, 2007.
  • Radiation protection: Conebeam CT for dental and maxillofacial radiology. Provisional guidelines (Vl. I) 2009, available at: http://www.sedentexct.eu
  • Timothy E. Lloyd, Nicholas A, Drage and Andrew J. Cronin. The role of cone beam computed tomography in the management of unfavourable fractures following sagittal split mandibular osteotomy. J Orthod 2011; 38: 48–54.
  • Fudalej P, Antoszewska J. Are orthodontic distalizers reinforced with the temporary skeletal anchorage devices effectively? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 139: 722–29.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.