In vitro comparison of contemporary radiographic imaging techniques for measurement of tooth length: reliability and radiation dose

References

• Mirabella D, Årtun J. Risk factors for apical root resorption of maxillary anterior teeth in adult orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995; 108: 48–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linge BO, Linge L. Apical root resorption in upper anterior teeth. Eur J Orthod 1983; 5: 173–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levander E, Malmgren O. Evaluation of the risk of root resorption in upper anterior teeth. Eur J Orthod 1988; 10: 30–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips JR. Apical root resorption under orthodontic therapy. Angle Orthod 1955; 44: 68–82.
   Google Scholar
• McFadden WM, Engstrom C, Engstrom H, Anholm JM. A study of the relationship between incisor intrusion and root shortening. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989; 96: 390–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costopoulos G, Nanda R. An evaluation of root resorption incident to orthodontic intrusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996; 109: 543–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brezniak NA, Goren S, Zoizner R. The Accuracy of the Cementoenamel Junction Identification on Periapical Films. Angle Orthod 2004; 74: 496–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frykolm A, Malmgren O, Samfors KA, Welander U. Angular measurements in orthopantomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1977; 6: 77–81.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haring JI, Jansen L. Dental radiology: principles and techniques, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders, 2000, 342–62.
   Google Scholar
• Lund H, Grondhal K. Cone beam computed tomography for assessment of root length and marginal bone level during orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 2010; 80: 466–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, White SC. Patient risk related to common dental radiographic examinations: the impact of 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations regarding dose calculation. J Am Dent Assoc 2008; 139: 1237–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr JH, Gron P. Palate contour as a limit factor in intraoral X-ray technique. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1959; 12: 459–72.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Parys K, Aartman IH, Kuitert R, Zentner A. Relationship between dental anomalies and orthodontic root resorption of upper incisors. Eur J Orthod 2012 34: 571–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gegler A, Fontanella V. In vitro evaluation of a method for obtaining periapical radiographs for diagnosis of external apical root resorption. Eur J Orthod 2008; 30: 315–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gher ME, Richardson AC. The accuracy of dental radiographic techniques used for evaluation of implant fixture placement. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1995; 15: 268–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stramotas S, Geenty JP, Darendeliler MA, Byloff F, Berger J, Petocz P. The reliability of crown-root ratio, linear and angular measurements on panoramic radiographs. Clin Orthod Res 2000; 3: 182–91.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sameshima GT, Asgarifar KO. Assessment of root resorption and root shape: periapical vs. panoramic films. Angle Orhod 2001; 71: 185–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rushton VE, Horner K, Worthington HV. The quality of panoramic radiographs in a sample of general dental practices. Br Dent J 1999; 186: 630–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherrard JF, Rossouw PE, Benson BW, Carrillo R, Buschang PH. Accuracy and reliability of tooth and root lengths measured on cone-beam computed tomographs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137: S100–08.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwong JC, Palomo JM, Landers MA, Figueroa A, Hans MG. Image quality produced by different cone-beam computed tomography settings. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 133: 317–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgaertel S, Palomo JM, Palomo L, Hansd MG. Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography dental measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 136: 19–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Periago DR, Scarfe WC, Moshiri M, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam ct derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program. Angle Orthod 2008; 78: 387–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts JA, Drage NA, Davies J, Thomas DW. Effective dose from cone beam CT examinations in dentistry. Br J Radiol 2009; 82: 35–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suomalainen A, Kiljunen T, Kaser Y, Peltola J, Kortesniemi M. Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009; 38: 367–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loubele M, Bogaerts R, van Dijck E. Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications. Eur J Radiol 2009; 71: 461–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harwood A. Field limitation to ‘dentition only’ in panoramic radiography for orthodontic patient. A Project report submitted in partial fulfillment of the Master of Science degree in dental and Maxillofacial Radiology, King’s College London Dental Institute, London, UK, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch E, Wolf U, Heinicke F, Silva MA. Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008; 37: 268–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks SL. CBCT dosimetry: orthodontic considerations. Semin Orthod 2009; 15: 14–18.
   Google Scholar
• Davies J, Johnson B, Drage NA. Effective doses from cone beam CT investigation of the jaws. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2012; 41: 30–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngan DC, Kharbanda OP, Geenty JP, Darendeliler MA. Comparison of radiation levels from computed tomography and conventional dental radiographs. Aust Orthod J 2003; 19: 67–75.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gijbels F, Sanderink G, Wyatt J. Radiation doses of indirect and direct digital cephalometric radiography. Br Dent J 2004; 197: 149–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedentex CT. Radiation radiation protection:cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial radiology: Evidence based guidelines, 2011.
   Google Scholar