A 3D analysis of Caucasian and African American facial morphologies in a US population

References

• Aldridge K, Boyadjiev SA, Capone GT, DeLeon VB, Richtmeier JT. Precision and error of three-dimensional phenotypic measures acquired from 3dMD photogrammetric images. Am J Med Genet A 2005; 138A: 247–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson AA, Anserson AC, Hornbuckle AC, Hornbuckle K. Biological derivation of a range of cephalometric norms for children of African American descent (after Steiner). Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000; 118: 90–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayoub AF, Siebert P, Moos KF, Wray D, Urquhart C, Niblett TB. A vision-based three-dimensional capture system for maxillofacial assessment and surgical planning. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998; 36: 353–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey KL, Taylor RW. Mesh diagram cephalometric norms for Americans of African descent. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998; 114: 218–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozic M, Kau CH, Richmond S, Hren NI, Zrurov A, Udovic M. Facial morphology of Slovenian and Welsh white population using 3-dimensional imaging. Angle Orhod 2009; 79: 640–645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozic M, Kau CH, Richmond S, Ovsenik M, Hren NI. Novel method of 3-dimensional soft-tissue analysis for Class III patients. Am Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 138: 758–769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrow Al ZarrinniaK, Azizi K. Bimaxillary protrusion in black Americans — an esthetic evaluation and the treatment considerations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993; 104: 240–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gor T, Kau CH, English JD, Lee RP, Borbely P. Three-dimensional comparison of facial morphology in white population in Budapest, Hungary, and Houston, Texas. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137: 424–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall D, Taylor RW, Jacobson A, Sadonwsky PL, Bartolucci A. The perception of optimal profile in African Americans versus white Americans as assessed by orthodontists and the lay public. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000; 118: 514–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang WJ, Taylor RW, Dasanayake AP. Determining cephalometrics norms for Caucasians and African Americans in Birmingham. Angle Orhtod 1998; 68: 503–511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kau CH, Richmond S, Zhurov AI, Knox J, Chestnutt I, Hartles F. Reliability of measuring facial morphology with a 3-dimensional laser scanning system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005a; 128: 424–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kau CH, Zhurov A, Bibb R, Hunter L, Richmond S. The investigation of the changing facial appearance of identical twins employing a three-dimensional laser imaging system. Orthod Craniofac Res 2005b; 8: 85–90.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kau CH, Zhurov A, Richmond S, Bibb R, Sugar A, Knox J. The 3-dimensional construction of the average 11-year-old child face: a clinical evaluation and application. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006a; 64: 1086–1092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kau CH, Zhurov A, Richmond S, Cronin A, Sanio C, Mallorie C. Facial templates: a new perspective in three dimensions. Orthod Craniofac Res 2006b; 9: 10–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kau CH, Richmond S, Incrapera A, English J, Xia JJ. Three-dimensional surface acquisition systems for the study of facial morphology and their application to maxillofacial surgery. Int J Med Robot 2007a; 3: 97–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kau CH, Hunter LM, Hingston EJ. A different look: 3-dimensional facial imaging of a child with Binder syndrome. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007b; 132: 704–709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kau CH, Richmond S. Three-dimensional analysis of facial morphology surface changes in untreated children from 12 to 14 years of age. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 134: 751–760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kau CH, Richmond S, Zhurov A, Ovsenik M, Tawfik W, Borbely P. Use of 3-dinensional surface acquisition to study facial morphology in 5 populations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137: S56.e51–S56.e59; discussion S56–S57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nkenke E, Benz M, Maier T, Wiltfang J, Holback LM, Kramer M. Relative en- and exophthalmometry in zygomatic fractures comparing optical non-contact, non-ionizing 3D imaging to the Hertel instrument and computed tomography. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2003; 31: 362–368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nomura M, Motegi E, Hatch JP, Gakunga PT, Ng’ang’a PM, Rugh JD. Esthetic preferences of European American, Hispanic American, Japanese, and African judges for soft-tissue profiles. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orhtop 2009; 135: S87–S95.
   Google Scholar
• Ras F, Habets LL, van Ginkel FC, Prahl-Anderson B. Method for quantifying facial asymmetry in three-dimensions using stereophotogrammetry. Angle Orthod 1995a; 65: 223–239.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ras F, Habets LL, van Ginkel FC, Prahl-Anderson B. Longitudinal study on three-dimensional changes of facial asymmetry in children between 4 to 12 years of age with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1995b; 32: 463–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarver DM, Ackerman JL. Orthodontics about face: the re-emergence of the ecthetic paradigm. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000; 117: 575–578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seager DC, Kau CH, English JD, Tawfik W, Bussa HI, Ahmed AI. Facial morphologies of an adult Egyptian population and an adult Houstonian white population compared using 3D imaging. Angle Orthod 2009; 79: 991–999.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susher NI. A photographic study of the soft-tissue profile of the Negro population. Am J Orthod 1977; 72: 373–385.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Takasaki H. Moire topography. Appl Opt 1970; 9: 1467–1472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas RG. An evaluation of the soft tissue facial profile in the North American black woman. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1979; 76: 84–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolleson SR, Kau CH, Lee RP, English JD, Harila V, Pirttiniemi P. 3-D analysis of facial asymmetry in children with hip dysplasia. Angle Orthod 2010; 80: 519–524.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Toma AM, Zrurov A, Playle R, Richmond S. A three-dimensional look for facial differences between males and females in a British-Caucasian sample aged 15 1/2 years old. Orthod Craniofac Res 2008; 11: 180–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada T, Sugahara T, Mori Y, Minami K, Sakuda M. Development of a 3-D measurement and evaluation system for facial forms with a liquid crystal range finder. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 1999; 58: 159–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yehezkel S, Turley PK. Changes in the African American female profile as depicted in fashion magazines during the 20th century. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004; 125: 407–417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar