Perception of the pitch and naturalness of popular music by cochlear implant users

References

• Baumann, U., Nobbe, A. 2006. The cochlear implant electrode-pitch function. Hearing Research, 213: 34–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumann, U., Rader, T., Helbig, S., Bahmer, A. 2011. Pitch matching psychometrics in electric acoustic stimulation. Ear and Hearing, 32: 656–662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boex, C., Baud, L., Cosendai, G., Sigrist, A., Kos, M.I., Pelizzone, M. 2006. Acoustic to electric pitch comparisons in cochlear implant subjects with residual hearing. JARO-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 7: 110–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, P.J. 2011. Potential benefits from deeply inserted cochlear implant electrodes. Ear and Hearing, 32: 411–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockmeier, S.J., Fitzgerald, D., Searle, O., Fitzgerald, H., Grasmeder, M., Hilbig, S., et al. 2011. The MuSIC perception test: a novel battery for testing music perception of cochlear implant users. Cochlear Implants International, 12: 10–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carlyon, R.P., Macherey, O., Frijns, J.H.M., Axon, P.R., Kalkman, R.K., Boyle, P., et al. 2010. Pitch comparisons between electrical stimulation of a cochlear implant and acoustic stimuli presented to a normal-hearing contralateral ear. JARO-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 11: 625–640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L.T., Richardson, L.M., Saunders, E., Cowan, R.S.C. 2003. Spatial spread of neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of improved ECAP method and psychophysical forward masking. Hearing Research, 179: 72–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, W.B., Tobey, E., Loizou, P.C. 2008. Music perception by cochlear implant and normal hearing listeners as measured by the Montreal Battery for Evaluation of Amusia. Ear and Hearing, 29: 618–626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorman, M.F., Spahr, T., Gifford, R., Loiselle, L., Mckarns, S., Holden, T., et al. 2007. An electric frequency-to-place map for a cochlear implant patient with hearing in the nonimplanted ear. JARO-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 8: 234–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drennan, W.R., Oleson, J.J., Gfeller, K., Crosson, J., Driscoll, V.D., Won, J.H., et al. 2015. Clinical evaluation of music perception, appraisal and experience in cochlear implant users. International Journal of Audiology, 54: 114–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franke-Trieger, A., Jolly, C., Darbinjan, A., Zahnert, T., Muerbe, D. 2014. Insertion depth angles of cochlear implant arrays with varying length: a temporal bone study. Otology & Neurotology, 35: 58–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvin, III J.J., Fu, Q.-J. 2011. Effect of bandpass filtering on melodic contour identification by cochlear implant users. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129: EL39–EL44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvin, J.J., III, Fu, Q.-J., Nogaki, G. 2007. Melodic contour identification by cochlear implant listeners. Ear and Hearing, 28: 302–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvin, J.J., III, Fu, Q.-J. , Oba, S.I. 2009. Effect of a competing instrument on melodic contour identification by cochlear implant users. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125: EL98–EL103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grasmeder, M.L., Verschuur, C.A., Batty, V.B. 2014. Optimizing frequency-to-electrode allocation for individual cochlear implant users. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 136: 3313–3324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, D.D. 1990. A cochlear frequency-position function for several species - 29 years later. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 87: 2592–2605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, R., Nimmons, G.L., Drennan, W., Longnion, J., Ruffin, C., Nie, K., et al. 2009. Development and Validation of the University of Washington clinical assessment of music perception test. Ear and Hearing, 30: 411–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landsberger, D., Galvin, J.J., III 2011. Discrimination between sequential and simultaneous virtual channels with electrical hearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130: 1559–1566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitin, D.J. 1994. Absolute memory for musical pitch - evidence from the production of learned melodies. Perception & Psychophysics, 56: 414–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limb, C.J., Roy, A.T. 2014. Technological, biological, and acoustical constraints to music perception in cochlear implant users. Hearing Research, 308: 13–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Looi, V., McDermott, H., Mckay, C., Hickson, L. 2008. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users. Ear and Hearing, 29: 421–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, H.J. 2004. Music perception with cochlear implants: a review. Trends Amplif, 8: 49–82.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore, B.C.J., Tan, C.T. 2003. Perceived naturalness of spectrally distorted speech and music. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 114: 408–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philips, B., Vinck, B., De Vel, E., Maes, L., D'Haenens, W., Keppler, H., et al. 2012. Characteristics and determinants of music appreciation in adult CI users. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 269: 813–821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plant, K.L., McDermott, H.J., van Hoesel, R.J.M., Dawson, P.W., Cowan, R.S. 2014. Factors influencing electrical place pitch perception in bimodal listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 136: 1199–1211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radeloff, A., Mack, M., Baghi, M., Gstoettner, W.K., Adunka, O.F. 2008. Variance of angular insertion depths in free-fitting and perimodiolar cochlear implant electrodes. Otology & Neurotology, 29: 131–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiss, L.A.J., Ito, R.A., Eggleston, J.L., Liao, S., Becker, J.J., Lakin, C.E., et al. 2015. Pitch adaptation patterns in bimodal cochlear implant users: over time and after experience. Ear and Hearing, 36: e23–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiss, L.A.J., Turner, C.W., Erenberg, S.R., Gantz, B.J. 2007. Changes in pitch with a cochlear implant over time. JARO-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 8: 241–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, A.T., Jiradejvong, P., Carver, C., Limb, C.J. 2012. Assessment of sound quality perception in cochlear implant users during music listening. Otology & Neurotology, 33: 319–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonyan, A. 2012. Pitch discrimination of cochlear implant users depending on the stimulations place and the stimulations rate. Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik, 129: 102–6.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, A., McDermott, H.J., Dowell, R.C., Sucher, C., Briggs, R.J.S. 2009. Comparison of two frequency-to-electrode maps for acoustic-electric stimulation. International Journal of Audiology, 48: 63–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stakhovskaya, O., Sridhar, D., Bonham, B.H., Leake, P.A. 2007. Frequency map for the human cochlear spiral ganglion: implications for cochlear implants. JARO-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 8: 220–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Besouw, R.M., Grasmeder, M.L. 2011. From TEMPO+ to OPUS 2: what can music tests tell us about processor upgrades?. Cochlear Implants International, 12(Suppl. 2): S40–3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Besouw, R.M., Nicholls, D.R., Oliver, B.R., Hodkinson, S.M., Grasmeder, M.L. 2014. Aural rehabilitation through music workshops for cochlear implant users. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 25: 311–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Besouw, R.M., Oliver, B.R., Hodkinson, S.M., Polfreman, R., Grasmeder, M.L. 2015. Participatory design of a music aural rehabilitation programme. Cochlear Implants International, 16: S39–S50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van der Marel, K.S., Briaire, J.J., Wolterbeek, R., Snel-Bongers, J., Verbist, B.M., Frijns, J.H.M. 2014. Diversity in cochlear morphology and its influence on cochlear implant electrode position. Ear and Hearing, 35: E9–E20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeire, K., Nobbe, A., Schleich, P., Nopp, P., Voormolen, M.H., van de Heyning, P.H. 2008. Neural tonotopy in cochlear implants: An evaluation in unilateral cochlear implant patients with unilateral deafness and tinnitus. Hearing Research, 245: 98–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, F.-G., Tang, Q., Lu, T. 2014. Abnormal pitch perception produced by cochlear implant stimulation. PLoS ONE, 9( 2): e88662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, F.G. 2002. Temporal pitch in electric hearing. Hearing Research, 174: 101–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, M., Chen, B., Galvin, III J.J., Fu, Q.-J. 2011. Influence of pitch, timbre and timing cues on melodic contour identification with a competing masker (L). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130: 3562–3565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar