1,282
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Developing Deaf Children's Conceptual Understanding and Scientific Argumentation Skills: A Literature Review

References

  • Adey, P.S. 1999. The Science of Thinking, and Science for Thinking: A Description of Cognitive Acceleration through Science Education (CASE). International Bureau of Education. Switzerland: PCL.
  • Antia, S.D., Jones, P.B., Reed, S. & Kreimeyer, K.H. 2009. Academic Status and Progress of Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students in General Education Classrooms. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 14(3):293–311.
  • Baumfield, V.M., Butterworth, M. & Edwards, G. 2005. The impact of the implementation of thinking skills programmes and approaches on teachers. In: Research Evidence in Education Library. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London. Available: http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=CYduHZj0Egw%3D&tab (accessed May, 2012)
  • Boyd, E. & George, K. 1973. The Effect of Science Inquiry on the Abstract Categorization Behaviour of Deaf Children. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 10:91–9.
  • Chinn, C. & Malhotra, B. 2002. Epistemologically Authentic Inquiry in Schools: A Theoretical Framework for Evaluating Inquiry Tasks. Science Education, 86:175–218.
  • Darden, L. 2002. Strategies for Discovering Mechanisms: Schema Instantiation, Modular Subassembly, Forward/Backward Chaining. Philosophy of Science, S69:S354–65.
  • DeHann, R.L. 2009. Teaching Creativity and Inventive Problem Solving in Science. CBE – Life Sciences Education, 8:172–81
  • Department for Education. 2011. Statistical First Release. National Curriculum Assessments at Key Stage 2 in England (Revised). [consulted May 2012]. Available at: <http://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/218991/main_20text_20sfr312011.pdf>
  • Department for Education. 2012a. National Curriculum Assessments. Early Years and Foundation Stage Profile. Handbook. [consulted August 2013]. Available at: <http://www.foundationyears.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/2013_eyfs_handbook.pdf>
  • Department for Education. 2012b. Science: Attainment Target Level Descriptors. [consulted May 2012]. Available at: <http://www.education.gov.uk/schools/teachingandlearning/curriculum/primary/b00199179/science/attainment>
  • Diebold, T.J. & Waldron, M.B. 1988. Designing Instructional Formats: The Effects of Verbal and Pictorial Components on Hearing Impaired Students’ Comprehension of Science Concepts. American Annals of the Deaf, 133(1):30–5.
  • Dorion, K.R. 2009. Science through Drama: A Multiple Case Exploration of the Characteristics of Drama Activities used in Secondary Science Lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 31(16):2247–70.
  • Easterbrooks, S.R. & Scheetz, N.A. 2004. Applying Critical Thinking Skills to Character Education and Values Clarification with Students who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing. American Annals of the Deaf, 149(3):255–63.
  • Easterbrooks, S.R. & Stephenson, B. 2006. An Examination of Twenty Literacy, Science and Mathematics Practices used to Educate Students who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing. American Annals of the Deaf, 151(4):385–97.
  • Ebrahim, F. 2006. Comparing Creative Thinking Abilities and Reasoning Ability of Deaf and Hearing Children. Roeper Review, 28(3):140–7.
  • Edwards, L., Figueras, B., Mellanby, J. & Langdon, D. 2011. Verbal and Spatial Analogical Reasoning in Deaf and Hearing Children: The Role of Grammar and Vocabulary. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 16(2):189–97.
  • Erduran, S., Simon, S. & Osborne, J. 2004. TAPping into Argumentation: Developments in the Application of Toumlin's Argument Pattern for Studying Science Discourse. Science Education, 88:915–33.
  • Fleisher Feldman, C. 2005. Mimesis: Where Play and Narrative Meet. Cognitive Development, 20:503–13.
  • Fradd, S.H. & Lee, O. 1999. Research News and Comment: Teacher's Roles in Promoting Science Inquiry with Students from Diverse Language Backgrounds. Educational Researcher, 28(6):14–42.
  • Friedman, N. & Szterman, R. 2011. The Comprehension and Production of Wh-Questions in Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Children. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 16(2):212–35.
  • Hart, J.E. & Lee, O. 2003. Teacher Professional Development to Improve the Science and Literacy Achievement of English Language Learners. Bilingual Research Journal: The Journal of the National Association for Bilingual Education, 27(3):475–501.
  • Higgins, S., Baumfield, V. & Hall, E. 2007. Learning skills and the development of learning capabilities. Technical report. In: Research Evidence in Education Library. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London. Available: http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=ATSf4i1r8Nc%3D&tabid=1852 (accessed May, 2012)
  • Huitt, W. 2011. Bloom et al.'s Taxonomy of the Cognitive Domain. Educational Psychology Interactive. Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University. URL [consulted May, 2012]. Available at: <http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/cognition/bloom.html [pdf]>
  • Jamaludin, A., Chee, Y.S. & Mei Lin Ho, C. 2009. Fostering Argumentative Knowledge Construction Through Enactive Role Play in Second Life. Computers & Education, 53:317–29.
  • Jeanes, R.C., Nienhuys, T.G.W.M. & Rickards, F.W. 2000. The Pragmatic Skills of Profoundly Deaf Children. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5(3):237–47.
  • Kuhn, D. 1999. A Developmental Model of Critical Thinking. Educational Researcher, 28(16):17–26.
  • Lang, H.G., LaPorta Hupper, M., Monte, D.A., Brown, S.W., Babb, I. & Scheifele, P.M. 2007. A Study of Technical Signs in Science: Implications for Lexical Database Development. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 12(1):65–79.
  • Lang, H.G. & Steely, D. 2003. Web-Based Science Instruction for Deaf Students: What Research Says to the Teacher. Instructional Science, 31:277–98.
  • Lederberg, A.R. & Everhart, V.S. 2000. Conversations between Deaf Children and their Hearing Mothers: Pragmatic and Dialogic Characteristics. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5(4):303–22.
  • Lord, T. & Orkwiszewski, T. 2006. Moving from Didactic to Inquiry-Based Instruction in a Science Laboratory. The American Biology Teacher, 68(6):342–5.
  • Mangrubang, F.R. 2005. Issues and Trends in Science Education: The Shortage of Qualified Science Teachers. American Annals of the Deaf, 150(1):42–6.
  • Marschark, M. 2003. Interactions of Language and Cognition in Deaf Learners: From Research to Practice. International Journal of Audiology, S42:S41–8.
  • Marschark, M., Sapere, P., Convertino, C., Mayer, C., Waters, L. & Sarchet, T. 2009. Are Deaf Students’ Reading Challenges Really about Reading? American Annals of the Deaf, 154(4):357–70.
  • McSharry, G. & Jones, S. 2000. Role Play in Science Teaching and Learning. School Science Review, 82(298):73–82.
  • Moeller, M.P. & Schick, B. 2006. Relations between Maternal Input and Theory of Mind Understanding in Deaf Children. Child Development, 77(3):751–66.
  • Moeller, M.P., Tomblin, J.B., Yoshinaga-Itano, C., McDonald Connor, C. & Jerger, S. 2007. Current State of Knowledge: Language and Literacy of Children with Hearing Impairment. Ear & Hearing, 28:740–53.
  • Molander, B.O., Pedersen, S. & Norell, K. 2001. Deaf Pupils’ Reasoning about Scientific Phenomena: School Science as a Framework for Understanding or as Fragments of Factual Knowledge. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 6(3):200–11.
  • Moores, D., Jathro, J. & Creech, B. 2001. Issues and Trends in Instruction and Deafness: American Annals of the Deaf 1996 to 2000. American Annals of the Deaf, 146(2):72–6.
  • National Advisory Committee on Creative and Cultural Education. 1999. All Our Futures: Creativity, Culture and Education. Report to the secretary of state for education and employment and the secretary of state for culture, media and sport. URL [consulted May 2012]. Available at: <sirkenrobinson.com/skr/pdf/allourfutures.pdf>
  • National Deaf Children's Society 2010. Hands up for Help. URL [consulted May 2012]. Available at: <http://www.ndcs.org.uk/about_us/campaign_with_us/england/hands_up_for_help/index.html>
  • National Deaf Children's Society 2011. NDCS note on Department for Education Figures on Attainment for Deaf Children in 2011 (England). URL [consulted November 2011]. Available at: http://www.education.gov.uk/rsgateway/DB/SFR/s001047/index.shtml
  • Odegaard, M. 2003. Dramatic Science: A Critical Review of Drama in Science Education. Studies in Science Education, 39:75–102.
  • Osborne, J. 2010. Arguing to Learn in Science: The Role of Collaborative, Critical Discourse. Science, 328:463–6.
  • Osborne, J.F. & Patterson, A. 2011. Scientific Argument and Explanation: A Necessary Distinction? Science Education, 95:627–38.
  • Palmer, D. 2008. Practices and Innovations in Australian Science Teacher Education Programs. Research in Science Education, 38:167–88.
  • Paul, P. & Wang, Y. 2006. Literate Thought and Multiple Literacies. Theory into Practice, 45(4):304–10.
  • Powers, S. 2007. The Educational Attainments of Deaf Pupils: A Discussion Paper on Data Currently Available. URL [consulted May 2012]. Available at: <http://www.batod.org.uk/index.php?id=/articles/research/nat-data.htm>
  • Robinson, K. 2009. CNN Opinion. How Schools Stifle Creativity. URL [consulted May 2012]. Available at: <http://www.cnn.com/2009/OPINION/11/03/robinson.schools.stifle.creativity/index.html>
  • Russ, R.S., Scherr, R.E., Hammer, D. & Mikeska, J. 2008. Recognising Mechanistic Reasoning in Student Scientific Inquiry: A Framework for Discourse Analysis Developed from Philosophy of Science. Science Education, 92:499–525.
  • Sampson, V., Grooms, J. & Walker, J.P. 2011. Argument-Driven Inquiry as a Way to Help Students Learn How to Participate in Scientific Argumentation and Craft Written Arguments: An Exploratory Study. Science Education, 95:217–57.
  • Science and Technology Committee 2006. Science Teaching in Schools. Report with Evidence. URL [consulted October 2012]. Available at: <http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200506/ldselect/ldsctech/257/257.pdf>
  • Scottish Sensory Centre 2008 . The Science Glossary. URL [consulted October 2012]. Available at: <http://www.ssc.education.ed.ac.uk/bsl/about.html>
  • Vosganoff, D., Paatsch, L.E. & Toe, D.M. 2011. The Mathematical and Science Skills of Students Who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing Educated in Inclusive Settings. Deafness & Education International, 13(2):70–88.
  • Wang, Y. 2011. Inquiry-Based Science Instruction and Performance Literacy for Students Who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing. American Annals of the Deaf, 156(3):239–54.
  • Woolfe, T., Want, CS.C. & Siegal, M. 2002. Signposts to Development: Theory of Mind in Deaf Children. Child development, 73(3):768–78.
  • Yore, L.D., Hand, B., Goldman, S.R., Hildebrand, G.M., Osborne, J.F., Treagust, D.F. & Wallace, C.S. 2004. New Directions in Language and Science Education Research. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(3):347–52.
  • Zainuddin, N.M.M., Zaman, H.B. & Ahmad, A. 2009. Learning Science Using AR Book: A Preliminary Study on Visual Needs of Deaf Learners. Visual Informatics: Bridging Research and Practice, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5857:844–55.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.