Advanced search
Publication Cover
The Imaging Science Journal Volume 61, 2013 - Issue 5
Submit an article Journal homepage
10
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

The usefulness of MR subtraction technique in metastatic spinal cancer

J-H Cho Department of Radiological ScienceGyeongsan University College, Korea; Department of Computer Science and EngineeringSoonchunhyang University, Korea
,
H-K Lee Department of Computer Science and EngineeringSoonchunhyang University, Korea
,
B-J HanDepartment of Biochemistry, School of Dentistry, IHBR, Kyungpook National University, Korea
,
J Lee Department of Radiological ScienceGyeongsan University College, Korea
,
K-R DongDepartment of Radiological Technology, Gwangju Health College University, Korea; Department of Nuclear EngineeringChosun University, Korea
,
W-K Chung Department of Nuclear EngineeringChosun University, KoreaCorrespondence[email protected]
&
J-Y BaeDepartment of Chemistry, Keimyung University, Korea
 show all
Pages 419-428 | Accepted 15 Mar 2012, Published online: 18 Nov 2013

REFERENCES

  • Weigel B, Maghsudi M, Neumann C, Kretschmer R. Surgical management of symptomatic spinal metastases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1999, 24, 2240–2246.
  • Wise JJ, Fischgrund JS, Herkowitz HN, Montgomery D. Complication, survival rates, and risk factors of surgery for metastatic disease of the spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1999, 24, 1943–1951.
  • Yuh WT, Quets J, Lee HJ, Simonson TM, Michalson LS, Nguyen PT, Sato Y, Mayr NA, Berbaum KS. Anatomic distribution of metastases in the vertebral body and modes of hematogenous spread. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1996, 21, 2243–2250.
  • Boland PJ, Lane JM, Sundaresan N. Metastatic disease of the spine. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 1982, 169, 95–102.
  • Tazi H, Manunta A, Rodriguez A, Patard JJ. Spinal cord compression in metastatic prostate cancer. Eur. Urol., 2003, 44, 527–532.
  • Berruti A, Dogliotti L, Bitosi R, Fasolis G, Gorzegno G, Bellina M, Torta M, Porpiglia F, Fontana D. Incidence of skeletal complications in patients with bone metastatic prostate cancer and hormone refractory disease: predictive role of bone resorption and formation markers evaluated at baseline. J. Urol., 2000, 164, 1248–1253.
  • Perez DJ, Powles TJ, Milan J, Gazet JC. Detection of breast carcinoma metastases in bone: relative merits of X-rays and skeletal scintigraphy. Lancet, 1983, 2, 613–616.
  • Lote K, Walloe A, Bjersand A. Bone metastasis. Prognosis, diagnosis and treatment. Acta Radiol. Oncol., 1986, 25, 227–232.
  • Moon JS, Won KC. The diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis. Yeungnam Univ. J. Med., 2005, 25, 19–30.
  • Okumura A, Watanabe Y, Dohke M. Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR portography. Radiographics, 1999, 19, 973–987.
  • Valhos L, Gouliamos A, Clauss W. GD-DPTA: a bowel contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging of the abdomen. Eur. Radiol., 1992, 2, 282–286.
  • Adamis MK, Li W, Wielopolsky PA, Kim D, Sax EJ, Kent KC, Eldelman RR. Dynamic contrast enhanced subtraction MR angiography of the lower extremity: initial evaluation with multisection two dimension time of flight sequence. Radiology, 1995, 196, 686–695.
  • Leyendecker JR, Rivera E, Washburn WK. MR angiography of the portal venous system: techniques interpretation, and clinical applications. Radiographics, 1997, 17, 1425–1443.
  • Wang Y, Jonhston DL, Huston J, Jack CR, Julsrud PR, Kiely MJ, King BF, Riederer SL, Eldman RL. Dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography using contrast enhancement, fast data acquisition, and complex subtraction. Magn. Reson. Med., 1996, 36, 4551–4556.
  • Fuchs VR, Sox HC. Physicians views of the relative importance of thirty medical innovations. Health Aff., 2001, 20, 30–42.
  • Vastag B. 2003 Nobels awarded for pioneering research in MRI cellular channels. JAMA, 2003, 290, 2245–2246.
  • Godersky JC, Smoker WRK, Knutzon R. Use of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of metastatic spinal disease. Neurosurgery, 1987, 21, 676–680.
  • Lee HJ, Ryeom HK, Kwon JH, Lee SK, Jang YM, Kim YS. Usefulness of digital subtraction technique in the contrast-enhanced multi-phasic abdominal MR angiography. J. Korean Radiol. Soc., 2001, 45, 175–182.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.