Feature-based recognition approaches for infrared anti-ship missile seekers

REFERENCES

• Adamy D. EW 102: A Second Course in Electronic Warfare, 2004 (Artech House Books, London).
   Google Scholar
• Titterton DH. The interaction in the development of optical missile seekers and jammer technology. Imaging Sci. J., 2010, 58, 276–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chemring Countermeasures Ltd. Modelling and Simulation [online], 2012 (Salisbury, Chemring Countermeasures Ltd) [accessed 12 January 2012]. Available at: <http://www.chemringcm.com/Products/TechnologyServices/ModellingandSimulati/>
   Google Scholar
• Hu MK. Visual pattern recognition by moment invariants. IRE Trans. Inf. Theory, 1962, 8, 179–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Withagen PJ, Schutte K, Vossepoel AM, Breuers MG. Automatic classification of ships from infrared (FLIR) images. Proc. SPIE, 1999, 3720, 180–187.
   Google Scholar
• Tremblay C, Valin P. Experiments on individual classifiers and on fusion of a set of classifiers, Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Information fusion, Annapolis, MD, USA, July 2002, ISIF, Vol. 1, pp272–277.
   Google Scholar
• Park Y, Sklansky J. Automated design of linear tree classifiers. Pattern Recogn., 1990, 23, 1393–1412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alves J. ‘Recognition of ship types from an infrared image using moment invariants and neural networks’, MSc thesis, US Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, USA, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Alves J, Herman J, Rowe NC. Robust recognition of ship types from an infrared silhouette, Proc. Command and Control Research and Technology Symp., San Diego, CA, USA, June 2004, CCRPS, Paper no. 070.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez HL, de Seixas J.M, Neves SR, Souza Filho J.B.O. Combining morphological mapping and principal curves for ship classification, Proc. Int. Symp. on Signals, circuits and systems: ISSCS 2005, Lasi, Romania, July 2005, IEEE, Vol. 2, pp. 605–608.
   Google Scholar
• Hastie T, Stuetzle W. Principal curves. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 1989, 84, 502–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Wang X. Automatic recognition of ship types from infrared images using support vector machines, Proc. Int. Conf. on Computer science and software engineering: CSSE 2008, Wuhan, China, December 2008, IEEE, Vol. 6, pp. 483–486.
   Google Scholar
• Lowe DG. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int. J. Comput. Vis., 2004, 60, 91–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feineigle PA, Morris DD, Snyder FD. Ship recognition using optical imagery for harbor surveillance, Proc. Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International AUVSI, Washington, DC, USA, June 2007, AUVSI, pp. 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Mouthaan MM, van den Broek SP, Hendriks EA, Schwering PBW. Region descriptors for automatic classification of small sea targets in infrared video. Opt. Eng., 2011, 50, 037002.
   Google Scholar
• Harris C, Stephens M. A combined corner and edge detection, Proc. 4th Alvey Vision Conf., Manchester, UK, September 1988, University of Manchester, pp. 147–151.
   Google Scholar
• Bay H, Ess A, Tuytelaars T, van Gool L. SURF: speeded up robust features. Comput. Vis. Image Understand., 2008, 110, 346–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vedaldi A, Fulkerson B. VLFeat: an open and portable library of computer vision algorithms (ver. 0·9·9), 2010 [accessed 12 January 2012]. Available at: <http://www.vlfeat.org>
   Google Scholar
• Viola PA, Jones MJ. Rapid object detection using a boosted cascade of simple features, Proc. IEEE Conf. on Computer vision and pattern recognition: CVPR 2001, Hawaii, HI, USA, December 2001, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 511–518.
   Google Scholar
• Kroon DJ. Matlab OpenSURF, 2012 (Natick, MA, MathWorks) [accessed 12 January 2012]. Available at: <http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/28300-opensurf-including-image-warp>
   Google Scholar
• Evans C. OpenSURF, 2012 [accessed 12 January 2012]. Available at: <http://www.chrisevansdev.com/computer-vision-opensurf.html>
   Google Scholar
• Hough PVC. ‘Method and means for recognizing complex patterns’, US Patent 3,069,654, 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Duda RO, Hart PE. Use of the Hough Transformation to detect lines and curves in pictures. Commun. ACM, 1972, 15, 11–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballard DH. Generalizing the Hough Transform to detect arbitrary shapes. Pattern Recogn., 1981, 13, 111–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Maraghi TF. Matlab Sift Tutorial [online], 2004 (Toronto, Ont., University of Toronto) [accessed 12 January 2012]. Available at: <ftp://ftp.cs.utoronto.ca/pub/jepson/teaching/vision/2503/SIFTtutorial.zip>
   Google Scholar
• Theodoridis S, Pikrakis A, Koutroumbas K, Cavouras D. An Introduction to Pattern Recognition: A Matlab Approach, 2010 (Elsevier Inc., Amsterdam).
   Google Scholar
• Smaragdis P, Radhakrishnan R, Wilson KW. In Multimedia Content Analysis: Theory and Applications (Ed. A. Divakaran), 2009, pp. 1–34 (Springer, New York).
   Google Scholar
• de Luna AE, Miravet C, Otaduy D, Dorronsoro C. A decision support system for ship identification based on the curvature scale space representation. Proc. SPIE, 2005, 5988, 59880K.
   Google Scholar
• Wu C. SiftGPU: A GPU implementation of scale invariant feature transform (SIFT) [online], 2007 (The Department of Computer Science, Chapel Hill, NC) [accessed 12 January 2012]. Available at: <http://cs.unc.edu/∼ccwu/siftgpu>
   Google Scholar
• Brown WM, Swonger CW. A prospectus for automatic target recognition. IEEE Trans. Aerospace Electron. Syst., 1989, 25, 401–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar