3D stereophotogrammetry: post-processing and surface integration

References

• Galdino GM, Nahabedian M, Chiaramonte M, Geng JZ, Klatsky S and Manson P. Clinical applications of three-dimensional photography in breast surgery. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 2002, 110, 58–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajeer MY, Ayoub AF, Millett DT, Bock M and Siebert JP. Three-dimensional imaging in orthognathic surgery: the clinical application of a new method. Int. J. Adult Orthod. Orthogn. Surg., 2002, 17, 318–330.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kau CH, Richmond S, Incrapera A, English J and Xia JJ. Three-dimensional surface acquisition systems for the study of facial morphology and their application to maxillofacial surgery. Int. J. Med. Robot., 2007, 3, 97–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyer HR, Carlson GW, Styblo TM and Losken A. Three-dimensional digital evaluation of breast symmetry after breast conservation therapy. J. Am. Coll. Surg., 2008, 207, 227–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh GD. Digital diagnostics: three-dimensional modeling. Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 2008, 46, 22–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul SM, Chamberlin AP, Hatt C, Nayak AV and Danoff JV. Reliability, validity and precision of an active stereophotogrammetry system for three-dimensional evaluation of the human torso. Med. Eng. Phys., 2009, 31, 1337–1342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pepper MR, Freeland-Graves JH, Yu W, Stanforth PR, Cahill JM, Mahometa M and Xu B. Validation of a 3-dimensional laser body scanner for assessment of waist and hip circumference. J. Am. Coll. Nutr., 2010, 29, 179–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabor LR, Chamberlin AP, Levy E, Perry MB, Cintas H and Paul SM. Digital stereophotogrammetry as a new technique to quantify truncal deformity: a pilot study in persons with osteogenesis imperfect. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 2011, 90, 844–850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Losken A, Seify H, Denson DD, Paredes AAJ and Carlson GW. Validating three-dimensional imaging of the breast. Ann. Plast. Surg., 2005, 54, 471–476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tepper OM, Small K, Rudolph L, Choi M and Karp N. Virtual 3-dimensional modelling as a valuable adjunct to aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. Am. J. Surg., 2006, 192, 548–551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J, Kawale M, Merchant FA, Weston J, Fingeret MC, Ladewig D, Reece GP, Crosby MA, Beahm EK and Markey MK. Validation of stereophotogrammetry of the human torso. Breast Cancer (Auckl), 2011, 15, 15–25.
   Google Scholar
• Ayoub AF, Xiao Y, Khambay B, Siebert JP and Hadley D. Towards building a photo-realistic virtual human face for craniomaxillofacial diagnosis and treatment planning. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 2007, 36, 423–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maal TJJ, Plooij JM, Rangel FA, Mollemans W, Schutyser FAC and Berge SJ. The accuracy of matching three-dimensional photographs with skin surfaces derived from cone-beam computed tomography. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 2008, 37, 641–646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plooij JM, Maal TJ, Haers P, Borstlap WA, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM and Bergé SJ. Digital three-dimensional image fusion processes for planning and evaluating orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. A systematic review. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 2011, 40, 341–532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirnhofer R, Jackowski C, Vock P, Potter K and Thali MJ. VIRTOPSY: minimally invasive, imaging-guided virtual autopsy. Radiographics, 2006, 26, 1305–1333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane C and Harrell W, Jr. Completing the 3-dimensional picture. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop., 2008, 133, 612–620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riphagen JM, van Neck JW and van Adrichem LNA. 3D surface imaging in medicine: a review of working principles and implications for imaging the unsedated child. J. Craniofac. Surg., 2008, 19, 517–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heike CL, Upson K, Stuhaug E and Weinberg SM. 3D digital stereophotogrammetry: a practical guide to facial image acquisition. Head Face Med., 2010, 6, 18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson AE and Kang SB. Registration and integration of textured 3D data, Proc. Int. Conf. on Recent advances in 3-D digital imaging and modeling 1997, Ottawa, Canada, May 1997, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 234–241.
   Google Scholar
• Weik S. Registration of 3D partial surface models using luminance and depth information, Proc. Int. Conf. on Recent advances in 3D digital imaging and modeling 1997, Ottawa, Canada, May 1997, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 93–100.
   Google Scholar
• Dorai C, Wang G, Jain AK and Mercer C. Registration and integration of multiple object views for 3D model construction. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 1998, 20, 83–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggert D.W., Fitzgibbon AW and Fisher RB. Simultaneous registration of multiple range views for use in reverse engineering of CAD models. Comput. Vis. Image Understand., 1998, 69, 253–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ju X, Boyling T, Siebert JP, McFarlane N, Wu J and Tillett R. Integration of range images in a multi-view stereo system, Proc. 17th Int. Conf. on Pattern recognition: ICPR 2004, Cambridge, UK, August 2004, IEEE Computer Society, Vol. 4, pp. 280–283.
   Google Scholar
• Ju X, Siebert JP, Khambay BS and Ayoub AF. Self correction of 3D reconstruction from multi-view stereo images, Proc. IEEE 12th Int. Conf. on Computer Vision: ICCV 2009, Kyoto, Japan, September–October 2009, IEEE, pp. 1606–1613.
   Google Scholar
• Bernardini F and Rushmeier H. The 3D model acquisition pipeline. Comput. Graph. Forum, 2002, 21, 149–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emelyanov A, Astakhov Y and Stanislav K. General concept of repairing CAD-models, Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on CyberWorlds 2009, Bradford, UK, September 2009, IEEE, pp. 108–113.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao W, Gao S and Lin H. A robust hole filling algorithm for triangular mesh. Vis. Comput., 2007, 23, 987–997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergevin R, Soucy M, Gagnon H and Laurendeau D. Towards a general multiview registration technique. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 1996, 18, 540–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turk G and Levoy M. Zippered polygon meshes from range images, Proc. 21st Annual Conf. on Computer graphics and interactive techniques: SIGGRAPH 1994, Orlando, FL, USA, July 1994, ACM, pp. 311–318.
   Google Scholar
• Rocchini C, Cignoni P, Montani C and Scopigno R. Multiple textures stitching and blending on 3D on 3D objects, Proc. 10th Eurographics Workshop on Rendering 1999, Granada, Spain, July 1999, Springer, pp. 127–138.
   Google Scholar
• Poncet P, Kravarusic D, Richart T, Evison R, Ronsky JL, Alassiri A and Sigalet D. Clinical impact of optical imaging with 3D reconstruction of torso topography in common anterior chest wall anomalies. J. Pediatr. Surg., 2007, 42, 898–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siebert JP and Marshall SJ. Human body 3D imaging by speckle texture projection. Sensor Rev., 2000, 20, 218–226.
   Google Scholar
• Bert C, Metheany KG, Doppke KP, Taghian AG, Powell SN and Chen GT. Clinical experience with a 3D surface patient setup system for alignment of partial-breast irradiation patients. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 2006, 64, 1265–1274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar