Stamping coal cake simulation with Duncan–Kelvin–Maxwell constitutive relations

References

• Prachethan Kumar P, Barman SC, Singh S and Ranjan M: ‘Influence of coal fluidity on coal blend and coke quality’, Ironmaking Steelmaking, 2008, 35, 416–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dash PS, Krishnan SH, Sharma R, Banerjee PK and Haldar SK: ‘Laboratory scale investigation to improve the productivity of stamp charge coke oven through optimisation of bulk density of coal cake’, ISIJ Int., 2005, 45, 1577–1586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan SH, Dash PS, Guha M, Kumar D and Deshpande DP: ‘Application of binder in stamp charge coke making’, ISIJ Int., 2004, 44, 1150–1156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dash PS, Guha M, Chakraborty D and Banerjee PK: ‘Prediction of coke CSR from coal blend characteristics using various techniques: a comparative evaluation’, Int. J. Coal Prep. Util., 2012, 32, 169–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abel F, Rosenkranz J and Kuyumcu HZ: ‘Stamped coal cakes in cokemaking technology. Part 1 – a parameter study on stampability’, Ironmaking Steelmaking, 2009, 36, 321–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abel F, Rosenkranz J and Kuyumcu HZ: ‘Stamped coal cakes in cokemaking technology: Part 2-the investigation of cake strength’, Ironmaking Steelmaking, 2009, 36, 327–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuyumcu HZ, Rosenkranz J and Abel F: ‘Densification behavior of coking coals within stamp charge operation’, Proc. 16th Int. Coal Preparation Cong., Society for Mining, Lexington, KY, USA, April 2010, Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration, 947–956.
   Google Scholar
• Wang JS, Wang DL, Gao SD and Guo JT: ‘Research on stamp charging car coal box pressure through field test’, Ironmaking Steelmaking, 2013, 40, 528–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sand A, Rosenkranz J and Kuyumcu HZ: ‘Modelling and simulation of stamp-charged coke making by 2-D discrete element method’, Adv. Powder Technol., 2013, 24, 1039–1047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pistrol J, Falkner F, Adam D and Adam C: ‘Comparison of constitutive soil models for the simulation of dynamic roller compaction’, Proc. 6th European Cong. on ‘Computational methods in applied sciences and engineering’, Vienna, Austria, September 2012, Vienna University of Technology, 5925–5939.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Q, L Nan C and Wan SM: ‘Study on impact effect of roadbed by impacted-style compactor based on FEM analysis’, J. Tianjin Univ., 2004, 37, 501–504.
   Google Scholar
• Khoei AR: ‘Numerical simulation of powder compaction processes using an inelastic finite element analysis’, Mater. Des., 2002, 23, 523–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman MM, Tarlochan F, Ramesh S, Ariffin AK and Nor SSM: ‘Numerical simulation and experimentation of warm metal powder compaction process’, Proc. 8th Int. Conf. on ‘Fracture and strength of solids 2010’, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, June 2010, Trans Tech Publications Ltd, 704–709.
   Google Scholar
• Sun HZ and Zhang W: ‘Analysis and experiment on damping properties of visco-elastic damper modeled by fractional Kelvin method’, J. Vib. Eng., 2008, 21, 48–53.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan JM and Y Chang C: ‘Nonlinear analysis of stress and strain in soils’, J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., 1970, 96, 1629–1653.
   Google Scholar
• Kulhawy FH and Duncan JM: ‘Stress and movements in Oroville Dam’, J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., 1972, 98, 653–665.
   Google Scholar
• Xie XH and Shen ZJ: ‘Modification of nonlinear model in the stress–strain analysis of earth and rockfill dam’, Hydro-Sci. Eng., 1988, 10, 43–55.
   Google Scholar
• Li H, Liao H and Han B: ‘A nonlinear constitutive model for soil under complex stress state’, Proc. 11th Asia-Pacific Conf. on ‘Engineering plasticity and its applications’, Singapore, Singapore, December 2012, Trans Tech Publications Ltd, 561–564.
   Google Scholar
• Yin ZZ and Xu ZW: ‘Anisotropy of soils and its approximate simulation’, Chin. J. Geotech. Eng., 2002, 24, 547–551.
   Google Scholar
• Miyazaki K, Tenma N, Aoki K and Yamaguchi T: ‘A nonlinear elastic model for triaxial compressive properties of artificial methane-hydrate-bearing sediment samples’, Energies, 2012, 5, 4057–4075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight MA and Adedapo A: ‘Numerical simulation of directional drilled pipelines placed under flexible pavements’, Proc. 12th Int. Conf. on ‘Computer methods and advances in geomechanics’, Goa, India, October 2008, International Association for Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics, 6, 4090–4097.
   Google Scholar
• Wang C, Peng Y and Liu H: ‘A E-μ model dependent on time’, Rock Soil Mech., 2004, 25, 595–600.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler HW, Sands CM, Song JH, Withers PJ and McDonald SA: ‘A plasticity model for powder compaction processes incorporating particle deformation and rearrangement’, Int. J. Solids Struct., 2008, 45, 2056–2076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Idriss IM and Seed HB: ‘Seismic response of horizontal soil lauers’, Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. J. Soil Mech., 1968, 94, 1003–1031.
   Google Scholar
• Zhan ML, Qian JH and Chen XL: ‘Tests on rheological behavior of soft soil and rheologic model’, Chin. J. Geotech. Eng., 1993, 15, 54–62.
   Google Scholar
• Kavazanjiar E and Mitchell JK: ‘Time-dependent deformation behavior of clays’, J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 1980, 106, 611–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu HL: ‘A review of recent advances in soil dynamics and geotechnical earthquake engineering’, China Civ. Eng. J., 2012, 45, 148–164.
   Google Scholar
• Ma GW, Ren XJ and Ren F: ‘Numerical simulation of compressive failure of heterogeneous rock-like materials using SPH method’, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 2011, 48, 353–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar