390
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Indirect effects of hiking trails on the community structure and diversity of trunk-epiphytic bryophytes in an old-growth fir forest

, &

References

  • Bader, M.Y., Reich, T., Wagner, S., González González, A.S. & Zotz, G. 2013. Differences in desiccation tolerance do not explain altitudinal distribution patterns of tropical bryophytes. Journal of Bryology, 35(1): 47–56.
  • Baldwin, L.K. & Bradfield, G.E. 2005. Bryophyte community differences between edge and interior environments in temperate rainforest fragments of coastal British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 35(3): 580–92.
  • Barkman, J.J. 1958. Phytosociology and ecology of cryptogamic epiphytes. Assen: Van Gorcum.
  • Bates, J.W. 1998. Is ‘life-form’ a useful concept in bryophyte ecology? Oikos, 82(2): 223–37.
  • Bayfield, N. 1971. A simple method for detecting variations in walker pressure laterally across paths. Journal of Applied Ecology, 8(2): 533–36.
  • Belinchón, R., Martínez, I., Escudero, A., Aragón, G. & Valladares, F. 2007. Edge effects on epiphytic communities in a Mediterranean Quercus pyrenaica forest. Journal of Vegetation Science, 18(1): 81–92.
  • Bella, E.M. 2011. Invasion prediction on Alaska trails: distribution, habitat, and trail use. Invasive Plant Science and Management, 4(3): 296–305.
  • Benninger-Truax, M., Vankat, J.L. & Schaefer, R.L. 1992. Trail corridors as habitat and conduits for movement of plant species in Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado. Landscape Ecology, 6(4): 269–78.
  • Birse, E.M. 1957. Ecological studies on growth-form in bryophytes. II. Experimental studies on growth-form in mosses. Journal of Ecology, 45(3): 721–33.
  • Birse, E.M. 1958a. Ecological studies on growth-form in bryophytes. III. The relationship between growth-form of mosses and ground water supply. Journal of Ecology, 46(1): 9–27.
  • Birse, E.M. 1958b. Ecological studies on growth-form in bryophytes. IV. Growth-form distribution in a deciduous wood. Journal of Ecology, 46(1): 29–42.
  • Boucher, D.H., Aviles, J., Chepote, C., Domínguez Gil, O.E. & Vilchez, B. 1991. Recovery of trailside vegetation from trampling in a tropical rain forest. Environmental Management, 15(2): 257–62.
  • Bright, J.A. 1986. Hiker impact on herbaceous vegetation along trails in an evergreen woodland of central Texas. Biological Conservation, 36(1): 53–69.
  • Burns, K.C. & Zotz, G. 2010. A hierarchical framework for investigating epiphyte assemblages: networks, metacommunities and scale. Ecology, 91(2): 377–85.
  • Caruso, A., Rudolphi, J. & Rydin, H. 2011. Positive edge effects on forest-interior cryptogams in clear-cuts. Plos ONE [online] 6 (November 2011) [accessed 13 January 2013]. Available at: <http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10·1371%2Fjournal.pone.0027936>
  • Catling, P.M. & Kostiuk, B. 2011. Some wild Canadian orchids benefit from woodland hiking trails – and the implications. Canadian Field-Naturalist, 125(2): 105–15.
  • Clius, M., Teleucă, A., David, O. & Moroşanu, A. 2012. Trail accessibility as a tool for sustainable management of protected areas: case study Ceahlău National Park, Romania. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 14: 267–78.
  • Cole, D.N. 1978. Estimating the susceptibility of wildland vegetation to trailside alteration. Journal of Applied Ecology, 15(1): 281–6.
  • Didham, R.K. & Lawton, J.H. 1999. Edge structure determines the magnitude of changes in microclimate and vegetation structure in tropical forest fragments. Biotropica, 31(1): 17–30.
  • Fritz, Ö., Niklasson, M. & Churski, M. 2009. Tree age is a key factor for the conservation of epiphytic lichens and bryophytes in beech forests. Applied Vegetation Science, 12(1): 93–106.
  • Glime, J.M. & Hong, W.S. 2002. Bole epiphytes on three conifer species from Queen Charlotte Islands, Canada. Bryologist, 105(3): 451–64.
  • González-Mancebo, J.M., Romaguera, F., Ana, L.L. & Suarez, A. 2004. Epiphytic bryophytes growing on Laurus azorica (Seub.) Franco in three laurel forest areas in Tenerife (Canary Islands). Acta Oecologica, 25(3): 159–67.
  • Gradstein, R. & Culmsee, H. 2010. Bryophyte diversity on tree trunks in montane forests of Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. Tropical Bryology, 31: 95–105.
  • Hall, C.N. & Kuss, F.R. 1989. Vegetation alteration along trails in Shenandoah National Park, Virginia. Biological Conservation, 48(3): 211–27.
  • Hylander, K. 2005. Aspect modifies the magnitude of edge effects on bryophyte growth in boreal forests. Journal of Applied Ecology, 42(3): 518–25.
  • Jonsson, B.G. & Esseen, P. 1990. Treefall disturbance maintains high bryophyte diversity in a boreal spruce forest. Journal of Ecology, 78(4): 924–36.
  • Karger, D.N., Kluge, J., Abrahamczyk, S., Salazar, L., Homeier, J., Lehnert, M., Amoroso, V.B. & Kessler, M. 2012. Bryophyte cover on trees as proxy for air humidity in the tropics. Ecological Indicators, 20: 277–81.
  • Kenkel, N.C. & Bradfield, G.E. 1981. Ordination of epiphytic bryophyte communities in a wet-temperate coniferous forest, south-coastal British Columbia. Vegetation, 45(3): 147–54.
  • Kiraly, I., Nascimbene, J., Tinya, F. & Odor, P. 2013. Factors influencing epiphytic bryophyte and lichen species richness at different spatial scales in managed temperate forests. Biodiversity and Conservation, 22(1): 209–23.
  • Kivistö, L. & Kuusinen, M. 2000. Edge effects on the epiphytic lichen flora of Picea abies in middle boreal Finland. Lichenologist, 32(4): 387–98.
  • Kurschner, H., Parolly, G. & Erdag, A. 2006. Life forms and life strategies of epiphytic bryophytes in Quercus vulcanica forests of Turkey. Nova Hedwigia, 82(3): 331–47.
  • Kuusinen, M. & Penttinen, A. 1999. Spatial pattern of the threatened epiphytic bryophyte Neckera pennata at two scales in a fragmented boreal forest. Ecography, 22(6): 729–35.
  • Leung, Y.F. & Marion, J.L. 1999. Assessing trail conditions in protected areas: application of a problem-assessment method in Great Smoky Mountains National Park, USA. Environmental Conservation, 26(4): 270–9.
  • Leung, Y.F. & Marion, J.L. 2000. Recreation impacts and management in wilderness: a state of the knowledge review. In: D.N. Cole, S.F. McCool, W.T. Borrie & J. O’Laughlin, eds. 2000. Wilderness science in a time of change. Vol. 5. Wilderness ecosystems threats and management. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, pp. 23–48.
  • Li, W.J., Ge, X.D. & Liu, C.Y. 2005. Hiking trails and tourism impact assessment in protected area: Jiuzhaigou Biosphere Reserve, China. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 108(1–3): 279–93.
  • Lobel, S., Snall, T. & Rydin, H. 2012. Epiphytic bryophytes near forest edges and on retention trees: reduced growth and reproduction especially in old-growth-forest indicator species. Journal of Applied Ecology, 49(6): 1334–43.
  • Maciel, L.A., Siles, M.F.R. & Bitencourt, M.D. 2011. Alterations in the herbaceous vegetation along a tourist trail in the Serra do Mar, Sao Paulo, Brazil. Acta Botanica Braslica, 25(3): 628–32.
  • Magurran, A.E. ed. 1988. Ecological diversity and its measurement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 192.
  • McGee, G.G. & Kimmerer, R.W. 2002. Forest age and management effects on epiphytic bryophyte communities in Adirondack northern hardwood forests, New York, USA. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 32(9): 1562–76.
  • Mežaka, A., Brūmelis, G. & Piterāns, A. 2012. Tree and stand-scale factors affecting richness and composition of epiphytic bryophytes and lichens in deciduous woodland key habitats. Biodiversity and Conservation, 21(12): 3221–41.
  • Moen, J. & Jonsson, B.G. 2003. Edge effects on liverworts and lichens in forest patches in a mosaic of boreal forest and wetland. Conservation Biology, 17(2): 380–8.
  • Murcia, C. 1995. Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 10(2): 58–62.
  • Nadkarni, M.N. 1992. The conservation of epiphytes and their habitats: summary of discussion at the international symposium on the biology and conservation of epiphytes. Selbyana, 13: 140–2.
  • Nagaike, T. 2003. Edge effects on stand structure and regeneration in a subalpine coniferous forest on Mt. Fuji, Japan, 30 years after road construction. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research, 35(4): 454–9.
  • Nepal, S.K. & Way, P. 2007. Comparison of vegetation conditions along two backcountry trails in Mount Robson Provincial Park, British Columbia (Canada). Journal of Environmental Management, 82(2): 240–9.
  • Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F.G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Minchin, P.R., O’Hara, R.B., Simpson, G.L., Solymos, P., Stevens, M.H.H. & Wagner, H. 2011. Vegan: community ecology package [online]. Vienna, Austria [accessed 20 December 2011]. Available at: <http://vegan.r-forge.r-project.org>
  • Oliveira, J.R.P.M., Porto, K.C. & Silva, M.P.P. 2011. Richness preservation in a fragmented landscape: a study of epiphytic bryophytes in an Atlantic forest remnant in Northeast Brazil. Journal of Bryology, 33(4): 279–90.
  • Perhans, K., Appelgren, L., Jonsson, F., Nordin, U., Soderstrom, B. & Gustafsson, L. 2009. Retention patches as potential refugia for bryophytes and lichens in managed forest landscapes. Biological Conservation, 142(5): 1125–33.
  • Proctor, M.C.F. 1990. The physiological basis of bryophyte production. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 104(1–3): 61–77.
  • Ries, L., Fletcher, R.J., Battin, J. & Sisk, T.D. 2004. Ecological responses to habitat edges: mechanisms, models, and variability explained. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 35: 491–522.
  • Roberge, J.M., Bengtsson, S.B.K., Wulff, S. & Snall, T. 2011. Edge creation and tree dieback influence the patch-tracking metapopulation dynamics of a red-listed epiphytic bryophyte. Journal of Applied Ecology, 48(3): 650–8.
  • Romanski, J., Pharo, E.J. & Kirkpatrick, J.B. 2011. Epiphytic bryophytes and habitat variation in montane rainforest, Peru. Bryologist, 114(4): 720–31.
  • Roovers, P., Baeten, S. & Hermy, M. 2004. Plant species variation across path ecotones in a variety of common vegetation types. Plant Ecology, 170(1): 107–19.
  • Rosabal, D., Burgaz, A.R., Altamirano, A. & Aragón, G. 2012. Differences in diversity of corticolous lichens between interior and edge of the Monte Barranca semi-deciduous forest, Santiago de Cuba. Bryologist 115(2): 333–40.
  • Song, L., Liu, W.Y., Ma, W.Z. & Tan, Z.H. 2011. Bole epiphytic bryophytes on Lithocarpus xylocarpus (Kurz) Markgr. in the Ailao mountains, SW China. Ecological Research, 26(2): 351–63.
  • Stephen, E.T. 1982. Direction and height of bryophytes on four species of Northern trees. Bryologist, 85(3): 281–300.
  • Stewart, K.J. & Mallik, A.U. 2006. Bryophyte responses to microclimate edge effects across riparian buffers. Ecological Applications, 16(4): 1474–86.
  • Wolf, J.H.D. 1993. Ecology of epiphytes and epiphyte communities in montane rain forests Colombia. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam.
  • Wu, P.C. 2002 ed. Flora Bryophytorum Sinicorum (Vol 6). Beijing: Science Press, pp. 145–248.
  • Wu, N., Bao, W.K. & Wu, Y. ed. 2012. World natural heritage — the ecological environment and sustainable development of Jiuzhai and Huanglong. Beijing: Science Press, p. 31.
  • Zartman, C.E. & Nascimento, H.E.M. 2006. Are habitat-tracking metacommunities dispersal limited? Inferences from abundance-occupancy patterns of epiphylls in Amazonian forest fragments. Biological Conservation, 1271(1): 46–54.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.