Phenotypic plasticity in Philonotis fontana (Bryopsida: Bartramiaceae)

References

• Allen B. 1999. The genus Philonotis (Bartramiaceae, Musci) in Central America. Haussknechtia Beiheft 9: 19–36.
   Google Scholar
• Anon. 1998. User's guide 2: data analysis and quality tools. State College, PA: Minitab.
   Google Scholar
• Bradshaw AD. 1965. Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Advances in Genetics 13: 115–155.
   Google Scholar
• Buryovi B. 2004. Genetic variation in two closely related species of Philonotis based on isozymes: Bryologist 107: 316–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crum H, Anderson LE. 1981. Mosses of eastern North America. Volume 1. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels RE. 1993. Phenotypic and genotypic variation in Sphagnum. Advances in Bryology 5: 31–60.
   Google Scholar
• Dismier MG. 1907. Essai monographique sur les Philonotis de France. Memoires de la Societe Nationale des Sciences Naturelles et Mathematiques de Cherbourg 36: 367–428.
   Google Scholar
• Dismier MG. 1910. Revision des Philonotis de l'Amérique. Memoires de la Societe Botanique de France 17: 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Flowers S. 1935. Bartramiaceae. In: Grout AJ, ed. Moss flora of North America north of Mexico, Volume 2. Newfane: by the author, 152–180.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin D. 2003. Philonotis. In: Version: 1, Date: November 26, 2003, Bryophyte flora of North America, Provisional Publication, Missouri Botanical Garden (http://ridgwaydb.mobot.org/bfnaN2/BartPhilonotis.htm
   Google Scholar
• Horton DG, Vitt DH. 1976. Morphological characters relative to distribution and taxonomic considerations of the genus Climacium in North America. Canadian Journal of Botany 54: 1872–1883.
   Google Scholar
• Kabiersch W. 1938. Studien iiber die ostasiatischen Arten einiger Laubmossfamilien II. Rhizogoniaceae, Bartramiaceae, Aulacomniaceae, Meeseaceae. Hedwigia 77: 71–136.
   Google Scholar
• Kammerer K. 1998. Kulturversuche und morphologische Taxonomie bei Philonotis Brid ( Musci). Diploma thesis, Institut fib- Botanik der Universität Hohenheim.
   Google Scholar
• Koponen T. 1998. Notes on Philonotis (Musci, Bartramiaceae). 3. A synopsis of the genus in China. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 84: 21–27.
   Google Scholar
• Koponen T, Norris DH. 1996. Bryophyte flora of the Huon Peninsula, Papua New Guinea. LVII. Fleischerobryum and Philonotis (Bartramiaceae, Musci). Acta Botanica Fennica 156: 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Lodge E. 1960. Effects of certain cultivation treatments on the morphology of some British species of Drepanocladus. Botanical Journal of Linnean Society, 56: 218–224.
   Google Scholar
• Loeske L. 1906. Kritische Übersicht der europäischen Philonoten. Hedwigia 45: 195–212.
   Google Scholar
• Nyholm E. 1998. Illustrated flora of Nordic mosses. Fasc. 4. Copenhagen and Lund: Nordic Bryological Society.
   Google Scholar
• Ochi H. 1962. Contribution to the mosses of Bartramiaceae in Japan and the adjacent region (1). Nova Hedwigia 4: 87–108.
   Google Scholar
• Rohlf FJ. 1992. NTSYS-pc. Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis. Version 1.70. Setauket.
   Google Scholar
• Ross SE, Callaghan TV, Sonesson M, Sheffield E. 2001. Variation and control of growth-form in the moss Hylocomium splendens. Journal of Bryology 23: 283–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAS Institute 1991. SAS user's guide: statistics. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Sistad SM, Pedersen B, Digre K. 1999. Habitat-specific genetic effects on growth rate and morphology across pH and water-level gradients within a population of the moss Sphagnum angustifolium (Sphagnaceae). American Journal of Botany 86: 1687–1698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlichting CD, Levin DA. 1986. Phenotypic plasticity: an evolving plant character. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 29: 37–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw AJ. 1990. Genetic and environmental effects on morphology and asexual reproduction in the moss, Bryum bicolor. Bryologist 93: 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw AJ, Bartow SM, 1991. Genetic structure and phenotypic plasticity in proximate populations of the moss, Funaria hygro-metrica. Systematic Botany 17: 257–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw AJ, Beer SC, 1999. Life history variation in gametophyte populations of the moss Ceratodon purpureus (Ditrichaceae). American Journal of Botany 86: 512–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenoien H, Bakken S, Flatberg KI. 1997. Phenotypic variation in the Sphagnum recurvum complex: a cultivation experiment. Journal of Bryology 19: 731–750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ter Braak CJF, gmilauer P. 2002. CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user's guide: software for canonical community ordination ( version 4.5). Ithaca, NY: Microcomputer Power.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderpoorten A, Jacquemart AL. 2004. Evolutionary mode, tempo, and phylogenetic association of continuous morphological traits in the aquatic moss genus Amblystegium. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 17: 279–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Via S. 1993. Adapative phenotypic plasticity - target or by-product of selection in a variable environment. American Naturalist 142: 352–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Via S, Gomulldewicz R, de Jong G, Scheiner SM, Schlichting CD, van Tienderen PH. 1995. Adaptive phenotypic plasticity: consensus and controversy. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10: 212–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zales WM. 1973. A taxonomic revision of the genus Philonotis for North America, north of Mexico. PhD thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
   Google Scholar
• Zastrow E. 1934. Experimentelle Studien fiber die Anpassung von Wasser- und Sumpfmoosen. Pflanzenforschung Heft 17. Jena: Fischer.
   Google Scholar