Urban myths exploded: results of a bryological survey of King's Lynn (Norfolk, UK)

References

• Adams KJ, Preston CD. 1992. Evidence for the effects of atmospheric pollution on bryophytes from national and local recording. In: Harding PT, ed. Biological recording of changes in British wildlife. London: HMSO, 31–43.
   Google Scholar
• Ballesteros Segura T, Ron ME. 1985. Contribución al estudio de la flora briológica de la ciudad de Toledo. Anales del Jardin Botanico de Madrid 42: 87–91.
   Google Scholar
• Barrow EM, Hulme M, Jiang T. 1993. A 1961-90 baseline climatology and future climate change scenarios for Great Britain and Europe. Part I: 1961-90 Great Britain baseline climatology. Norwich: Climatic Research Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Bates JW, Bell JNB, Farmer AM. 1990. Epiphyte recolonization of oaks along a gradient of air pollution in south-east England, 1979-1990. Environmental Pollution 68: 81–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates JW, Proctor MCF, Preston CD, Hodgetts NG, Perry AR. 1997. Occurrence of epiphytic bryophytes in a ‘tetrad’ transect across southern Britain 1. Geographical trends in abundance and evidence of recent change. Journal of Bryology 19: 685–714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckett G, Bull A, Stevenson R. 1999. A flora of Norfolk: Privately published by Gillian Beckett.
   Google Scholar
• Burton MAS. 1990. Terrestrial and aquatic bryophytes as monitors of environmental contaminants in urban and industrial habitats. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 104: 267–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carcano L. 1989. Moss inventory of the urban area of Rome. Braun-Blanquetia 3: 147–150.
   Google Scholar
• Cortini Pedrotti C. 1989. La flore bryologique de la ville de Camerino (Italie centrale). Braun-Blanquetia 3: 241–246.
   Google Scholar
• Cox DR, Snell EJ. 1981. Analysis of binary data. 2 edn. London: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Fudali E. 1994. Species diversity and spatial distribution of bryophytes in urban areas — a case study of the city of Szczecin. Fragmenta Floristica et Geobotanica 39: 563–570.
   Google Scholar
• Fudali E. 1996. Distribution of bryophytes in various urban-use complexes of Szczecin (NW Poland). Fragmenta Floristica et Geobotanica 41: 717–745.
   Google Scholar
• Fudali E. 1998. Investigations of bryophytes in Polish towns — a review of the bryological research and data. Fragmenta Floristica et Geobotanica 43: 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Fudali E. 2000. Some open questions of the bryophytes of urban areas and their response to urbanization's impact. Perspectives in Environmental Sciences 2: 14–18.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller RM, Groom GB, Jones AR. 1994. The Land Cover Map of Great Britain: an automated classification of Landsat Thematic Mapper data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 60: 553–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert OL. 1968. Bryophytes as indicators of air pollution in the Tyne valley. New Phytologist 67: 15–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert OL. 1971. Urban bryophyte communities in north-east England. Transactions of the British Bryological Society 6: 306–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert OL. 1989. The ecology of urban habitats. London: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Heras P, Soria A. 1990. Musgos y hepaticas urbanos de la ciudad de Vitoria-Gasteiz. Sociedad de Estudios Vascos - Eusko Ikaskuntza, Cuadernos de Seccion, Ciencias Naturales 7: 75–116.
   Google Scholar
• Hill MO, Preston CD, Bosanquet SDS, Roy DB. 2007. BRYOATT attributes of British and Irish mosses, liverworts and hornworts. Huntingdon: Centre for Ecology & Hydrology.
   Google Scholar
• Hohenwallner D, Zechmeister HG. 2001. Factors influencing bryophyte species richness and populations in urban environments: a case study. Nova Hedwigia 73: 87–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunin WE. 1998. Extrapolating species abundance across spatial scales. Science 281: 1513–1515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lara F, Lopez C, Mazimpaka V. 1991. Ecologia de los briófitos urbanos en la ciudad de Segovia (Espana). Cryptogamie, Bryologie-Lichenologie 12: 425–439.
   Google Scholar
• Lo Giudice R. 1992. Contributo alla conoscenza della brioflora urbana di Catania. Quaderni di Botanica Ambientale e Applicata 3: 3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Lo Giudice R, Mazimpaka V, Lara F. 1997. The urban bryophyte flora of the city of Enna (Sicily, Italy). Nova Hedwigia 64: 249–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne RM. 1995. The flora of King's Lynn. Transactions of the Norfolk and Norwich Naturalists' Society 30: 317–342.
   Google Scholar
• Pearman D. 1997. Towards a new definition of rare and scarce plants. Watsonia 21: 225–245.
   Google Scholar
• Petch CP, Swann EL. 1968. Flora of Norfolk. orwich: Jarrold & Sons. Pokorny L, Lara F, Mazimpaka V. 2006. The bryophyte flora of the city of Trento (North Italy). Cryptogamie, Bryologie 27: 265–284.
   Google Scholar
• Ron E, Mazimpaka V, Vicente J, Granzow de la Cerda I. 1987. Urban bryophytes in Spanish towns. Symposia Biologica Hungarica 35: 727–753.
   Google Scholar
• Schaepe A. 1986. Vereinderungen der Moosflora von Berlin ( West). Berlin/Stuttgart: J. Cramer.
   Google Scholar
• Soria A, Ron ME. 1995. Aportaciones al conocimiento de la brioflora urbana espariola. Cryptogamie, Bryologie-Lichenologie 16: 285–299.
   Google Scholar
• Swann EL. 1975. Supplement to the Flora of Norfolk. Norwich: F. Crowe & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Swann EL. 1982. Norfolk bryophytes today. Journal of Bryology 12: 77–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 1973. Ecological effects of utilisation in urban and industrial systems. Expert Panel Project II, MAB report No. 13. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderpoorten A. 1997. A bryological survey of the Brussels Capital Region (Belgium). Scripta Botanica Belgica 14: 1–83.
   Google Scholar