Attributes of rarity in a regional bryophyte assemblage

References

• Bock CE. 1987. Distribution-abundance relationships of some Arizona landbirds: a matter of scale? Ecology 68: 124–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown HI. 1984. On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. American Naturalist 124: 255–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleavitt NL. 2001. Disentangling moss species limitations: the role of substrate specificity for six species occurring on substrates with varying pH and percent organic matter. Bryologist 104: 59–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleavitt NL. 2002. Stress tolerance of rare and common moss species in relation to their occupied environments and asexual dispersal potential. Journal of Ecology 90: 785–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleavitt NL. 2005. Patterns, hypotheses and processes in the biology of rare bryophytes. Bryologist 108: 554–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleveland WS. 1981. LOWESS: A program for smoothing scatterplots by robust locally weighted regression. The American Statistician 35: 54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotgreave P, Pagel MD. 1997. Predicting and understanding rarity: the comparative approach. In: Kunin WE, Gaston KJ, eds. The biology of rarity: causes and consequences of rare-common differences. London: Chapman & Hall, pp. 237–261.
   Google Scholar
• Davies CE, Moss D, Hifi MO. 2004. EUNIS habitat classification revised 2004. Report to the European Environment Agency European Topic Centre on Nature Protection and Biodiversity. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Eppley SM, Taylor PJ, Jesson LK. 2007. Self-fertilization in mosses: a comparison of heterozygote deficiency between species with combined versus separate sexes. Heredity 98: 38–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaston KJ. 1994. Rarity. London: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hedderson TA. 1992. Rarity at range limits: dispersal capacity and habitat relationships of extraneous moss species in a boreal Canadian national park. Biological Conservation 59: 113–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinlen ER, Vitt DH. 2003. Patterns of rarity in mosses of the Okanogan Highlands of Washington State: an emerging coarse filter approach to rare moss conservation. Bryologist 106: 34–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heino J, Virtanen R. 2006. Relationships between distribution and abundance vary with spatial scale and ecological group in stream bryophytes. Freshwater Biology 51: 1879–1889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill MO, Bell N, Bruggeman-Nannenga MA, Brugués M, Cano MJ, Enroth J, Flatberg KI, Frahm J-P, Gallengo MT, Garilleti R, Guerra J, Hedenis L, Holyoak DT, Hyvönen J, Ignatov MS, Lara F, Mazimpaka V, Mutioz J, Söderström L. 2006. An annotated checklist of the mosses of Europe and Macronesia. Journal of Bryology 28: 198–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill MO, Preston CD, Bosanquet SDS, Roy DB. 2007. BRYOATT: attributes of British and Irish mosses, liverworts and hornworts. Huntingdon: Centre for Ecology and Hydrology.
   Google Scholar
• Ingerpuu N, Vellak K. 1995. The distribution and some ecological characteristics of Estonian rare bryophytes. Arctoa 5: 143–148.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall M. 1938. A new measure of rank correlation. Biometrika 30: 81–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunin WE. 1997. Introduction: on the causes and consequences of rare-common differences. In: Kunin WE, Gaston KJ, eds. The biology of rarity: causes and consequences of rare-common differences. London: Chapman & Hall, pp. 3–11.
   Google Scholar
• Laaka-Lindberg S, Hedderson TA, Longton RE. 2000. Rarity and reproductive characters in the British hepatic flora. Lindbergia 25: 78–84.
   Google Scholar
• Lester SE, Ruttenberg BI, Gaines SD, Kinlan BP. 2007. The relationship between dispersal ability and geographic range size. Ecology Letters 10: 745–758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löbel S, Snail T, Rydin H. 2006. Metapopulation processes in epiphytes inferred from patterns of regional distribution and local abundance in fragmented forest landscapes. Journal of Ecology 94: 856–868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longton RE. 1992. Reproduction and rarity in British mosses. Biological Conservation 59: 89–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longton RE. 1997. Reproduction biology and life-history strategies. In: Longton RE, ed. Advances in Bryology 6. Population studies. Berlin: J. Cramer, pp. 65-102.
   Google Scholar
• Munloz J, Felicisimo AM, Cabezas F, Burgaz AR, Martinez I. 2004. Wind as a long-distance dispersal vehicle in the Southern Hemisphere. Science 304: 1144–1147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. 2007. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Söderström L. 1987. Dispersal as a limiting factor for distribution among epixylic bryophytes. Symposia Biologica Hungarica 35: 441–444.
   Google Scholar
• Söderström L. 1989. Regional distribution patterns of bryophyte species on spruce logs in Sweden. Bryologist 92: 349–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderström L, During HJ. 2005. Bryophyte rarity viewed from the perspectives of life history strategy and metapopulation dynamics. Journal of Bryology 27: 261–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundberg S, Hansson J, Rydin H. 2006. Colonization of Sphagnum on land uplift islands in the Baltic Sea: time, area, distance and life history. Journal of Biogeography 33: 1479–1491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson K, Hodgson JG, Gaston KJ. 1998. Abundance-range size relationships in the herbaceous flora of central England. Journal of Ecology 86: 439–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vellak K, Vellak A, Ingerpuu N. 2007. Reasons for moss rarity: study in three neighbouring countries. Biological Conservation 135: 360–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitt DH, Selland RJ. 1997. Attributes of rarity among Alberta mosses: patterns and prediction of species diversity. Bryologist 100: 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigginton MJ. 1995. Mosses and liverworts of North Lancashire: a bryophyte flora of Lancashire north of the River Ribble. Lancaster: University of Lancaster.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcoxon F. 1945. Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics Bulletin 1: 80–83.
   Google Scholar
• Zanten BO van. 1978. Experimental studies on transoceanic long-range dispersal of moss spores in the Southern Hemisphere. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 44: 455–482.
   Google Scholar
• Zanten BO van, Gradstain SR. 1988. Experimental dispersal geography of neotropical liverworts. Nova Hedwigia Beihefte 90: 41–94.
   Google Scholar
• Zanten BO van, Pócs T. 1981. Distribution and dispersal in bryophytes. Advances in Bryology 1: 479–562.
   Google Scholar