Sex ratio, spatial segregation, and fertilization rates of the epiphyllous moss Crossomitrium patrisiae (Brid.) Müll.Hal. in the Brazilian Atlantic rainforest

References

• Allen B. 1990. A revision of the genus Crossomitrium (Musci: Hookeriaceae). Tropical Bryology, 2: 3–34.
   Google Scholar
• Bisang I, Ehrlén J. 2002. Reproductive effort and cost of sexual reproduction in female Dicranum polysetum. Bryologist, 105: 384–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisang I, Ehrlén J, Hedenäs L. 2004. Mate limited reproductive success in two dioicous mosses. Oikos, 104: 291–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisang I, Ehrlén J, Hedenäs L. 2006. Reproductive effort and costs of reproduction do not explain female-biased sex ratios in the moss Pseudocalliergon trifarium (Amblystegiaceae). American Journal of Botany, 93(9): 1313–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisang I, Hedenäs L. 2005. Sex ratio patterns in dioicous bryophytes re-visited. Journal of Bryology, 27(3): 205–217.
   Google Scholar
• Bisang I, Hedenäs L. 2008. Mate limitation does not explain the lack of capsules in a Pseudocalliergon trifarium population. Journal of Bryology, 30(1): 97–9.
   Google Scholar
• Bowker MA, Stark LR, McLetchie DN. 2000. Sex expression, skewed sex ratio, and microhabitat distribution in the dioecious desert moss Syntrichia caninervis (Pottiaceae). American Journal of Botany, 87(4): 517–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brasil-MMA. 2002. Biodiversidade Brasileira: avaliação e identificação de áreas e ações prioritárias para conservação, utilização sustentável e repartição de benefícios da biodiversidade Brasileira. Brasília: Ministério do Meio Ambiente.
   Google Scholar
• Buck WR. 1998. Pleurocarpous mosses of the West Indies. Memoirs of New York Botanical Garden, 1: 1–401.
   Google Scholar
• Crawley MJ. 2007. The R Book. Chichester: Imperial College London at Silwood Park.
   Google Scholar
• Cronberg N, Andersson K, Wyatt R, Odrzykoski IJ. 2003. Clonal distribution, fertility and sex ratios of the moss Plagiomnium affine (Bland.) T.Kop. in forests of contrasting age. Journal of Bryology, 25: 155–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronberg N, Rydgren K, Økland RH. 2006. Clonal structure and genet-level sex ratios suggest different roles of vegetative and sexual reproduction in the clonal moss Hylocomium splendens. Ecography, 29: 95–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• During HJ. 1979. Life strategies of bryophytes: a preliminary review. Lindbergia, 5: 2–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrlén J, Bisang I, Hedenäs L. 2000. Costs of sporophyte production in the moss, Dicranum polysetum. Plant Ecology, 149(2): 207–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazer GW, Trofymow JA, Lertzman KP. 2000. Canopy openness and leaf area in chronosequences of coastal temperate rainforests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 30(2): 239–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuselier L, McLetchie DN. 2004. Microhabitat and sex distribution in Marchantia inflexa, a dioicous liverwort. Bryologist, 107(3): 345–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glime JM. 2007. Bryophyte ecology. Volume 1. Physiological ecology. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists [accessed 21 March 2012]. Available at: <http://www.bryoecol.mtu.edu/>
   Google Scholar
• Gotelli NJ, Ellison AM. 2004. A primer of ecological statistics. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Gradstein SR. 1997. The taxonomic diversity of epiphyllous bryophytes. Abstracta Botanica, 21(1): 15–9.
   Google Scholar
• Granzow de la Cerda I. 1989. Flujo gamético en poblaciones de un musgo pleurocárpico dioico, Anomodon viticulosus (Hedw.) Hook. & Tayl., mediante un experimento de trasplante. Botanica Complutensis, 15: 91–100.
   Google Scholar
• Groen KE, Stieha C, Crowley PH, McLetchie DN. 2010. Sex-specific plant responses to light intensity and canopy openness: implications for spatial segregation of the sexes. Oecologia, 162(3): 561–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heegaard E, , , . 2001. Environmental relationships of perichaetial and sporophyte production in Andreaea spp in western Norway. Journal of Bryology, 23: 97–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horsley K, Stark LR, McLetchie DN. 2011. Does the silver moss Bryum argenteum exhibit sex-specific patterns in vegetative growth rate, asexual fitness, or prezygotic reproductive investment? Annals of Botany, 107(6): 897–907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBGE. 1985. Atlas nacional do Brasil: região nordeste. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE.
   Google Scholar
• Longton RE. 1997. Reproductive biology and life-history strategies. Advances in Bryology, 6: 65–101.
   Google Scholar
• Longton RE, Greene SW. 1969. Relationship between sex distribution and sporophyte production in Pleurozium schreberi (Brid.) Mitt. Annals of Botany, 33(1): 107–26.
   Google Scholar
• Longton RE, Schuster RM. 1983. Reproductive biology. In: R.M. Schuster, ed. New manual of bryology. Nichinan: Hattori Botanical Laboratory, pp. 386–462.
   Google Scholar
• McLetchie DN. 1992. Sex ratio from germination through maturity and its reproductive consequences in the liverwort Sphaerocarpos texanus. Oecologia, 92(2): 273–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLetchie DN. 1996. Sperm limitation and genetic effects on fecundity in the dioecious liverwort Sphaerocarpos texanus. Sex Plant Reproduction, 9(2): 87–92.
   Google Scholar
• McLetchie DN, Puterbaugh MN. 2000. Population sex ratios, sex specific clonal traits and tradeoffs among these in the liverwort Marchantia inflexa. Oikos, 90(2): 227–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira SM, Pôrto KC. 2002. Population profile of Bryum apiculatum Schwaegr. in an Atlantic Forest remnant, Pernambuco, Brazil. Journal of Bryology, 24(2): 251.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira S.M, Pôrto KC. 2005. Sporophyte production and population structure of two species of Pottiaceae in an Atlantic Forest remnant in Pernambuco, Brazil. Cryptogamie, 26: 239–47.
   Google Scholar
• Pohjamo M, Laaka-Lindberg S. 2003. Reproductive modes in the epixylic hepatic Anastrophyllum hellerianum. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 6(3): 159–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. 2008. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Reese W D. 1984. Reproductivity, fertility and range of Syrrhopodon texanus Sull. (Musci; Calymperaceae), a North American endemic. Bryologist, 87(3): 217–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reich PB, Uhl C, Walters MB, Prugh L, Ellsworth DS. 2004. Leaf demography and phenology in Amazonian rain forest: a census of 40 000 leaves of 23 tree species. Ecological Monographs, 74(1): 3–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice SK, Neal N, Mango J, Black K. 2011. Relationships among shoot tissue, canopy and photosynthetic characteristics in the feathermoss Pleurozium schreberi. Bryologist, 114: 367–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards PW. 1984. The ecology of tropical forest bryophytes. In: R.M. Schuster, ed. New manual of bryology. Nichinan: Hattori Botanical Laboratory, pp. 1233–70.
   Google Scholar
• Richards AJ. 1997. Plant breeding systems. London: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Riemann B. 1972. On the sex-distribution and the occurrence of sporophytes in Rhytidiadelphus triquetrus (Hedw.) Warnst. in Scandinavia. Lindbergia, 1: 219–24.
   Google Scholar
• Rydgren, K , Cronberg R, Økland RH. 2006. Factors influencing reproductive success in the clonal moss Hylocomium splendens. Oecologia, 147(3): 445–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydgren K, Halvorsen R, Cronberg N. 2010. Infrequent sporophyte production maintains a female-biased sex ratio in the unisexual clonal moss Hylocomium splendens. Journal of Ecology, 98(5): 1224–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydgren K, Økland RH. 2001. Sporophyte production in the clonal moss Hylocomium splendens: the importance of shoot density. Journal of Bryology, 23: 91–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydgren K, Økland R.H. 2002a. Ultimate costs of sporophyte production in the clonal moss Hylocomium splendens. Ecology, 83(6): 1573–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydgren K, Økland RH. 2002b. Life-cycle graphs and matrix modelling of bryophyte populations. Lindbergia, 27: 81–9.
   Google Scholar
• Rydgren K, Økland RH. 2002c. Sex distribution and sporophyte frequency in a population of the clonal moss Hylocomium splendens. Journal of Bryology, 24(3): 207–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagmo-Solli IM, Söderström L, Bakken S, Flatberg KI, Pedersen B. 1998. Reproductive phenology of Dicranum majus in Central Norway. Journal of Bryology, 20: 311–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw J. 1993. Population biology of the rare copper moss, Scopelophila cataractae. American Journal of Botany, 80(9): 1034–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw AJ, Gaughan JF. 1993. Control of sex ratios in haploid populations of the moss, Ceratodon purpureus. American Journal of Botany, 80(5): 584–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderström L, During HJ. 2005. Bryophyte rarity viewed from the perspectives of life history strategy and metapopulation dynamics. Journal of Bryology, 27(3): 261–8.
   Google Scholar
• Söderström L, Herben T. 1997. Dynamics of bryophyte metapopulations. Advances in Bryology, 6: 205–40.
   Google Scholar
• Sonnleitner M, Dullinger S, Wanek W, Zechmeister H. 2009. Microclimatic patterns correlate with the distribution of epiphyllous bryophytes in a tropical lowland rain forest in Costa Rica. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 25(3): 321–30.
   Google Scholar
• Stark LR, McLetchie DN, Mishler BD. 2000. The cost of realized sexual reproduction: assessing patterns of reproductive allocation and sporophyte abortion in a desert moss. American Journal of Botany, 87(11): 1599–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark LR, McLetchie DN, Mishler BD. 2005. Sex expression, plant size, and spatial segregation of the sexes across a stress gradient in the desert moss Syntrichia caninervis. Bryologist, 108(2): 183–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark LR, Mishler BD, McLetchie DN. 1998. Sex expression and growth rates in natural populations of the desert soil crustal moss Syntrichia caninervis. Journal of Arid Environments, 40(4): 401–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark L, Nichols II L, McLetchie ND, Smith SD, Zundel C. 2004. Age and sex-specific rates of leaf regeneration in the Mojave Desert moss Syntrichia caninervis. American Journal of Botany, 91(1): 1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiers BM. 1988. Morphological adaptations of the Jungermanniales (Hepaticae) to the tropical rainforest habitat. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory, 64: 5–14.
   Google Scholar
• van der Velde M, During HJ, van de Zande L, Bijlsma R. 2001. The reproductive biology of Polytrichum formosum: clonal structure and paternity revealed by microsatellites. Molecular Ecology, 10: 2423–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaz TF, Costa DP. 2006. Os gêneros Brymela, Callicostella, Crossomitrium, Cyclodictyon, Hookeriopsis, Hypnella e Trachyxiphyum (Pilotrichaceae, Bryophyta) no Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Acta Botanica Brasilica, 20(4): 955–73.
   Google Scholar
• Veloso HP, Rangel-Filho ALR, Lima JCA. 1991. Classificação da vegetação Brasileira adaptada a um sistema universal. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística.
   Google Scholar
• Zartman CE. 2003. Forest fragmentation effects on epiphyllous bryophyte communities in central Amazonia. Ecology, 84(4): 948–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar