Interface migration during partitioning of Q&P steel

References

• Speer J, Matlock DK, de Cooman BC and Schroth JG: ‘Carbon partitioning into austenite after martensite transformation’, Acta Mater., 2003, 51, 2611–2622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmonds DVV, He K, Rizzo FCC, de Cooman BCC, Matlock DKK and Speer JGG: ‘Quenching and partitioning martensite – a novel steel heat treatment’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2006, A438–A440, 25–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Moor E, Lacroix S, Clarke AJ, Penning J and Speer JG: ‘Effect of retained austenite stabilized via quench and partitioning on the strain hardening of martensitic steels’, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2008, 39A, 2586–2595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke A, Speer JG, Matlock DK, Rizzo FC, Edmonds DV and Santofimia MJ: ‘Influence of carbon partitioning kinetics on final austenite fraction during quenching and partitioning’, Scr. Mater., 2009, 61, 149–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speer JG, Hackenberg RE, Decooman BC and Matlock DK: ‘Influence of interface migration during annealing of martensite/austenite mixtures’, Philos. Mag. Lett., 2007, 87, 379–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong N, Wang X, Rong Y and Wang L: ‘Interface migration between martensite and austenite’, J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2006, 22, 751–754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santofimia MJ, Zhao L and Sietsma J: ‘Model for the interaction between interface migration and carbon diffusion during annealing of martensite–austenite microstructures in steels’, Scr. Mater., 2008, 59, 159–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santofimia MJ, Speer JG, Clarke aJ, Zhao L and Sietsma J: ‘Influence of interface mobility on the evolution of austenite–martensite grain assemblies during annealing’, Acta Mater., 2009, 57, 4548–4557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan L, Ponge D, Wittig J, Choi P, Jiménez JA and Raabe D: ‘Nanoscale austenite reversion through partitioning, segregation, and kinetic freezing: example of a ductile 2 GPa Fe–Cr–C steel’, Acta Mater., 2012, 60, 2790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guy KB, Butler EP, and West DRF: ‘Reversion of bcc α′ martensite in Fe–Cr–Ni austenitic stainless steels’, Met. Sci., 1983, 17, 167–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler H and Pitsch W: ‘On the nature of the martensite to austenite reverse transformation’, Acta Metall., 1967, 15, 401–405.
   Google Scholar
• Apple CA and Krauss G: ‘The effect of heating rate on the martensite to austenite transformation in Fe–Ni–C alloys’, Acta Metall., 1972, 20, 849–856.
   Google Scholar
• Tavares SSM, Fruchart D and Miraglia S: ‘A magnetic study of the reversion of martensite α′ in a 304 stainless steel’, J. Alloys Compd, 2000, 307, 311–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith H and West DRF: ‘The reversion of martensite to austenite in certain stainless steels’, J. Mater. Sci., 1973, 8, 1413–1420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aaronson HI, Howe JM, Hall MG, Furuhara T and Hirth JP: ‘Mobility of structural ledges’, Scr. Mater., 1997, 37, 1301–1307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe JM: ‘Comparison of the atomic structure, composition, kinetics and mechanisms of interfacial motion in martensitic, bainitic, massive and precipitation face-centered cubic–hexagonal close-packed phase transformations’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2006, A438–A440, 35–42.
   Google Scholar
• Wu J, Howe JM and Zhang WZ: ‘An in situ transmission electron microscopy study of interface growth during martensitic transformation in an Fe–Ni–Mn alloy’, Acta Mater., 2011, 59, 3297–3303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma X and Pond RC: ‘Parent–martensite interface structure in ferrous systems’, J. Nucl. Mater., 2007, 361, 313–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ‘Retained austenite and its measurement by X-ray diffraction’, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA, USA, 1980, 12.
   Google Scholar
• Santofimia MJJ, Zhao L, Petrov R, Kwakernaak C, Sloof WGG and Sietsma J: ‘Microstructural development during the quenching and partitioning process in a newly designed low-carbon steel’, Acta Mater., 2011, 59, 6059–6068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyson DJ and Holmes B: ‘Effect of alloy additions on the lattice parameter of austenite’, J. Iron Steel Inst., 1970, 208, 469–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk NH: ‘Thermal stability of retained austenite in TRIP steels studied by synchrotron X-ray diffraction during cooling’, Acta Mater., 2005, 53, 5439–5447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas G, Speer J, Matlock D and Michael J: ‘Application of electron backscatter diffraction techniques to quenched and partitioned steels’, Microsc. Microanal., 2011, 17, 368–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santofimia MJ, Zhao L, Petrov R and Sietsma J: ‘Characterization of the microstructure obtained by the quenching and partitioning process in a low-carbon steel’, Mater. Charact., 2008, 59, 1758–1764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas GA: ‘A study of partitioning mechanisms operating during Q&P heat treatment of steel’, PhD thesis, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO, USA, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Cheol KHK, Lee H, Um K.-K, Choi J.-K and Kim NJ: ‘Microstructural development in Fe–12Mn steel’, Proc. Int. Conf. on ‘Advanced steel’, 78, Guilin, China, November 2010, CSM.
   Google Scholar
• Krauss G: ‘Processing, structure, and performance’, 613; 2005, Materials Park, OH, ASM International.
   Google Scholar
• He Y, Godet S and Jonas JJ: ‘Representation of misorientations in Rodrigues–Frank space: application to the Bain, Kurdjumov–Sachs, Nishiyama–Wassermann and Pitsch orientation relationships in the Gibeon meteorite’, Acta Mater., 2005, 53, 1179–1190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhadeshia HKDH: ‘Worked examples in the geometry of crystals’, 2nd edn; 1987, London, Maney Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kajiwara S: ‘Velocity of the austenite-martensite interface in reverse martensitic transformation in FeNiC alloys’, Mater. Charact., 1995, 34, 105–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kajiwara S and Owen WS: ‘The martensite–austenite interface and the thickness of twins in martensite in Fe 3Pt’, Scr. Metall., 1977, 11, 137–142.
   Google Scholar
• Mangonon PL and Thomas G: ‘Structure and properties of thermal-mechanically treated 304 stainless steel’, Metall. Trans., 1970, 1, 1587–1594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kajiwara S and Kikuchi T: ‘Reversible movement of the austenite–martensite interface and dislocation structures in reverse-transformed austenite in Fe–Ni–C alloys’, Philos. Mag. A 1983, 48A, 509–526.
   Google Scholar
• Mangonon P and Thomas G: ‘The martensite phases in 304 stainless steel’, Metall. Trans., 1970, 1, 1577–1586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauzzi F and Montanari R: ‘Martensite reversion in an Fe–21%Mn–0·1%C alloy’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 1999, A273–A275, 524–527,.
   Google Scholar
• Montanari R: ‘AISI 304 steel: effects of slow heating rates on α′→γ reversion’, Mater. Lett., 1989, 8, 297–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zararsiz A, Gedikoğlu A and Durlu TN: ‘Mössbauer study of martensite to austenite reverse transformations in Fe 17·1% Ni O. 81% C alloy’, Scr. Metall., 1981, 15, 999–1001.
   Google Scholar