Evidence, insight, or intuition? Investment decisions in the commissioning of prevention services for older people

References

• Glasby J (ed). Commissioning for Health and Well-being. Bristol: Policy Press; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Bovaird T, Dickinson H, Allen K. Commissioning across government: review of evidence. Birmingham: Third Sector Research Centre; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. Caring for our future: reforming care and support. London: The Stationary Office; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. The case for change – why England needs a new care and support system. London: Department of Health; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. Shaping the future of care together. London: The Stationary Office; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. Prevention package for older people. London: The Stationary Office; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Klein R. Rationing in the Fiscal Ice Age. Health Econ Policy Law, 2010;5:389–96.
   Google Scholar
• Audit Commission. The coming of age: improving care services for older people. London: Audit Commission; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Audit Commission. The way to go home: rehabilitation and remedial services for older people. London: Audit Commission; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Association of Directors of Social Services/Local Government Association. All our tomorrows: inverting the triangle of care. London: ADSS; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Lymbery M. A new vision for adult social care? Continuities and change in the care of older people. Crit Soc Policy 2010;30:5–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Think Local Act Personal. A sector-wide commitment to moving forward with personalisation and community-based support. 2011. Available from: http://www.thinklocalactpersonal.org.uk/ (Downloaded 1 March 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Allen K, Glasby J. English report on prevention and rehabilitation (Interlinks national report). Birmingham: Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Allen K, Glasby J. The (multi-)billion dollar question: embedding prevention and rehabilitation in English health and social care. Journal of Integrated Care. 2010;18(4):26–35.
   Google Scholar
• Allen K, Glasby J. ‘The billion dollar question’: embedding prevention in older people's services – 10 ‘high impact’ changes. Birmingham: Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Windle K, Wagland R, Forder J, D'Amico F, Janssen D, Wistow G. National evaluation of Partnerships for Older People projects: final report. Canterbury: Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes M, Bauld L, Benzeval M, Judge K, Mackenzie M, Sullivan H. Health action zones: partnerships for health equity. London: Routledge; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Glendinning C, Jones K, Baxter K, Rabiee P, Curtis LA, Wilde A, et al. Home care re-ablement services: investigating the longer-term impacts (prospective longitudinal study). York: Social Policy Research Unit, University of York; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod B, Mair M. Evaluation of Edinburgh Council home care reablement service. Edinburgh: Scottish Government Social Research; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Steventon A, Bardsley M. The impact of telehealth on use of hospital care and mortality. London; Nuffield Trust; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Beech R, Roberts D. Assistive technology and older people. London: SCIE; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Francis J, Fisher M, Rutter D. Reablement: a cost-effective route to better outcomes. London: SCIE; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Williams I, Glasby J. Making ‘what works’ work: the use of knowledge in UK health and social care decision-making. Policy and Society ‘http://www.sciencedirect.com.ezproxye.bham.ac.uk/science/journal/14494035/29/2’ \o ‘Go to table of contents for this volume/issue’ 29(2): 2010; 95–102.
   Google Scholar
• Bonell B. The politics of the research-policy interface: randomised trials and the commissioning of HIV prevention services. Sociol Health Illn 2002;24(4):385–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nutley SM, Waleter I, Davies HTO. Using evidence. How research can inform public services. Bristol: Policy Press; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss CH. The many meanings of research utilisation. Public Adm Rev 1979;39(5):426–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasby J, Walshe K, Harvey G. Making evidence fit for purpose in decision making: A case study of the hospital discharge of older people. Evidence and Policy. 2007;3(3):425–437.
   Google Scholar
• Williams I. Institutions and health care rationing: the example of health care coverage in the English National Health Service. Policy and Politics. 2010;41(2):223–239
   Google Scholar
• Black N. Evidence-based policy: proceed with care. BMJ 2001;323:275–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor-Robinson DC, Milton B, Lloyd-Williams F, O'Flaherty M, Capewell S. Planning ahead in public health? A qualitative study of the time horizons used in public health decision-making. BMC Public Health 2008;8:415. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-8-415.
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone D. Squaring the circle: evidence at local level. London: Alliance for Useful Evidence; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Robson C. Real world research. 3rd ed. West Sussex: Wiley; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. Measuring social value: how five social enterprises did it. London: Department of Health; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Social Enterprise UK. The Social Value Guide: Implementing the Public Services (Social Value) Act. London: Social Enterprise UK; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Rush B., Ogborne A. Program logic models: expanding their role and structure for program planning and evaluation. Canadian J Program Eval 1991;6:95–106.
   Google Scholar
• Local Government Improvement and Development. Measuring impact in health improvement. London: LGID; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Newton C. Personalising reablement: inserting the missing link. Working with Older People 2012;16(3):117–21.
   Google Scholar
• Netten A, Forder J, Beadle-Brown J, Caiels J, Malley J, Smith N, et al. Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit v1.0: Main Guidance, PSSRU Discussion Paper No. 2716. Canterbury: Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Needham C, Carr S. Co-production: an emerging evidence base for adult social care transformation. London: Social Care Institute for Excellence; 2009.
   Google Scholar