Impact of grain structure of austenitic stainless steel on osteoblasts differention and mineralisation

References

• Borsari V, Giavaresi G, Fini M, Torrielli P and Salito A: ‘Physical characterization of different-roughness titanium surfaces, with and without hydroxyapatite coating, and their effect on human osteoblast-like cells’, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B: Appl. Biomater., 2005, 75B, 359–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arenas MA, Tate TJ, Conde A and de Damboreba J: ‘Corrosion behavior of nitrogen implanted titanium in simulated body fluid’, Br. Corros. J., 2000, 35, 232–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willman G: ‘Coating of implants with hydroxyapatite–material connections between bone and metal’, Adv. Eng. Mater., 1999, 1, 95–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misra RDK, Nayak S, Venkatasurya PKC, Ramuni V, Somani MC and Karjalainen LP: ‘Nanograined/ultrafine-grained structure and tensile deformation behavior of shear phase reversion-induced 301 austenitic stainless steel’, Metall. Trans. A, 2010, 41A, 2162–2174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misra RDK, Nayak S, Mali S, Shah J, Somani MC and Karjalainen LP: ‘On the significance of nature of strain-induced martensite on phase-reversion induced nanograined/ultrafine-grained (NG/UFG) austenitic stainless steel’, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2010, 41A, 3–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misra RDK, Nayak S, Mali S, Shah J, Somani MC and Karjalainen LP: ‘Microstructure and deformation behavior of phase-reversion induced nanograined/ultrafine-grained (NG/UFG) austenitic stainless steel’, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2009, 40A, 2498–2509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somani MC, Junten P, Karjalainen LP, Misra RDK and Kyrolainen A: ‘Enhanced mechanical properties through reversion in metastable austenitic stainless steels’, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2009, 40A, (3), 729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misra RDK, Venkatasurya PKC, Somani MC and Karjalainen LP: ‘Nanoscale deformation behavior of phase reversion-induced austenitic stainless steels: the interplay between grain size from nano-grain regime to coarse-grain regime’, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2012, 43A, 5286–5297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misra RDK, Shah J, Mali S, Venkatasurya PKC, Somani MC and Karjalainen LP: ‘Phase reversion-induced nanograined austenitic stainless steels: microstructure, reversion and deformation mechanisms’, Mater. Sci. Technol., 2013, 29, 1185–1192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams DF: ‘Biocompatibility of clinical materials’; 1981, Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yunzhi Y, Renee C and Joo L: ’Protein adsorption on titanium surfaces and their effect on osteoblast attachment’, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A, 2003, 67A, (1), 344–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horbett TA and Brash JL: ‘Proteins at interfaces: II – Fundamental and applications’, 1–23; 1995, Washington, DC, American Chemical Society.
   Google Scholar
• Ratner BD: ‘Some background concepts’, in ‘Biomaterials science: an introduction to materials in medicine’, (ed. Ratner B D et al.), 133; 1996, San Diego, CA, Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horbett TA: ‘Proteins: structure, properties, and adsorption to surfaces’, in ‘Biomaterials science: an introduction to materials in medicine’, (ed. Ratner B D et al.), 133–141; 1996, San Diego, CA, Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kristian R: ‘The influence of surface roughness on protein adsorption’, PhD thesis, 2006 , Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Aarhus, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Williams RL and Williams DF: ‘The spatial resolution of protein adsorption on surfaces of heterogenous metallic biomaterials’, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 1989, 23, (3), 339–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misra RDK and Nune C: ‘Biological response to the self-assembly of pre-adsorbed proteins at biointerfaces: significance, cellular activity, and perspective’, Mater. Technol.: Adv. Perf. Mater., 2014, 29, B41–B48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misra RDK, Nune C, Pesacreta TC, Somani MC and Karjalainen LP: ‘Understanding the impact of grain structure in austenitic stainless steel from nano-grained regime to coarse-grained regime on osteoblast functions using a novel metal deformation-annealing sequence’, Acta Biomater., 2013, 9, 6245–6258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller TF, Reichert J, Thanh TP, Adjiski R, Spiess L, Berzina-Cimdina L, Jandt KD and Bossert J: ‘Facets of protein assembly on nanostructured titanium oxide surfaces’, Acta Biomater., 2013, 9, (3), 5810–5820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster TJ, Siegel RW and Bizios R: ‘Enhanced surface and mechanical properties of nanophase ceramics to achieve orthopaedic/dental implant efficacy’, Key Eng. Mater., 2001, 192–195, 321–324.
   Google Scholar
• Cai K, Jandt KD and Bossert J: ‘Does the nanometer scale topography of titanium influence protein adsorption and cell proliferation?’, Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces, 2006, 49B, 136–144.
   Google Scholar
• Anselme K and Bigerelle M: ‘Role of materials surface topography on mammalian cell response’, Int. Mater. Rev., 2011, 56, 243–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentleman MM and Gentleman E: ‘The role of surface free energy in osteoblast-biomaterial interactions’, Int. Mater. Rev., 2014; 59 (8), 417–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baier RE, Meyer AE, Natiella JR, Natiella RR and Carter JM: ‘Surface properties determine bioadhesive outcomes: methods and results’, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 1984, 18, (4), 337–355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandrovcova M and Bacakova L: ‘Adhesion, growth and differentiation of osteoblasts on surface-modified materials developed for bone implants’, Physiol. Res., 2011, 60, 403–417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson CJ, Clegg RE, Leavesley DI and Pearcy MJ: ‘Mediation of biomaterial–cell interactions by adsorbed proteins: a review’, Tissue Eng., 2005, 11, (1–2), 1–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tsukimura N, Kojima N, Kubo K, Att W, Takeuchi K, Kameyama Y, Maeda H and Ogawa T: ‘The effect of superficial chemistry of titanium on osteoblastic function’, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A, 2008, 84A, (1), 108–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nune C, Misra RDK, Somani MC and Karjalainen LP: ‘Dependence of cellular activity at protein adsorbed biointerfaces with nano- to microscale dimensionality’, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A, 2014, 102A, (6), 1663–1676.
   Google Scholar
• Misra RDK, Nune C, Pesacreta TC, Somani MC and Karjalainen LP: ‘Interplay between grain structure and protein adsorption on functional response of osteoblasts: ultrafine-grained versus coarse-grained substrates’, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A, 2013, 101A, 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatasurya PKC, Girase B, Misra RDK, Pesacreta TC, Somani MC and Karjalainen LP: ‘The interplay between osteoblasts functions and the degree of nanoscale roughness of nanograined materials’, Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 2011, C32, 330–340.
   Google Scholar
• Misra RDK, Venkatasurya PKC, Girase B, Somani MC and Karjalainen LP: ‘Cellular mechanisms of enhanced osteoblasts functions via phase-reversion induced nano/submicron-grained structure in a low-Ni austenitic stainless steel’, Adv. Biomater., 2011, 13B, 483–492.
   Google Scholar
• Misra RDK, Thien-Han WW, Pesacreta TC, Somani MC and Karjalainen LP: ‘Biological significance of nanograined/ultrafine-grained structures; Interaction with fibroblasts’, Acta Biomater., 2010, 6, 3339–3348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misra RDK, Mali S, Thien-Han WW, Somani MC and Karjalainen LP: ‘Cellular activity of bioactive nanograined/ultrafine grained materials’, Acta Biomater., 2010, 6, 2826–2833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatasurya PKC, Thien-Han WW, Misra RDC, Somani MC and Karjalainen LP: ‘Advancing nanograined/ultrafine-grained structures for metal implant technology: interplay between grooving of nano/ultrafine-grains and cellular response’, Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 2010, C30, 1050–1059.
   Google Scholar
• Misra RDK, Thien-Han WW, Somani MC and Karjalainen LP: ‘Phase reversion induced nanograined/ultrafine-grained structures in austenitic stainless steel and their significance in modulating cellular response: biochemical and morphological study with fibroblasts’, Adv. Eng. Mater.: Adv. Biomater., 2009, 11, B235–B242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faghihi S, Azari F, Zhilyeav AP, Vali H and Tabrizian M: ‘Nanostructuring of a titanium material by high-pressure torsion improves pre-osteoblast attachment’, Adv. Mater. Res., 2007, 19, 1069–1073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faghihi S, Azari F, Zhilyeav AP, Vali H and Tabrizian M: ‘Cellular and molecular interactions between MC3T3-E1 pre-osteoblasts and nanostructured titanium produced by high-pressure torsion’, Biomaterials, 2007, 28, 3887–3895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen LB, Murray A, Segal RA, Bushnell A and Walsh ML: ‘Studies on intercellular LETS glycoprotein matrices’, Cell, 1978, 14, 377–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynes RO and Bye JM: ‘Density and cell cycle dependence of cell surface proteins in hamster fibroblasts’, Cell, 1974, 3, 113–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster TJ, Ergun C, Doemus RH, Siegel RW and Bizios R: ‘Enhanced function of osteoblast on nanophase ceramics’, Biomaterials, 2000, 67, 1374–1383.
   Google Scholar
• Ehara A, Ogata K, Imazato S, Ebisu S, Nakano T and Umakoshi Y: ‘Effects of alpha-TCP and beta-TCP on MC3T3-E1 proliferation, differentiation and mineralization’, Biomaterials, 2003, 24, 831–836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datta N, Holterf HL, Sikuritsas VI, Jansen JA and Mikos AG: ‘Effect of bone extracellular matrix synthesized in vitro on the osteoblastic differentiation of marrow stromal cells’, Biomaterials, 2005, 26, 971–977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikavitsas VI, Bancroft GN, Lemoine JJ, Liebschner MAK, Dauner M and Mikos AG: ‘Flow perfusion enhances the calcified matrix deposition of marrow stromal cells in biodegradable nonwoven fiber mesh scaffolds’, Ann. Biomed. Eng., 2005, 33, 63–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer U, Szulczewski DH, Moller K, Heide H, Jones DB and Gross U: ‘Attachment kinetics and differentiation of osteoblasts on different biomaterials’, Cells Mater. J., 1993, 3, 129–140.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter A, Archer CW, Walker PS and Blunn GW: ‘Attachment and proliferation of osteoblasts and fibroblasts on biomaterials for orthopedic use’, Biomaterials, 1995, 16, 287–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Recum AF, Shannon CE, Cannon EC, Long KJ, van Kooten TG and Meyle J: ‘Surface roughness, porosity and texture as modifiers of cellular adhesion’, Tissue Eng., 1996, 2, 241–253.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldberg VM and Jinno T: ‘The bone implant interface: a dynamic surface’, J. Long Term Eff. Med. Implants, 1999, 9, 11–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buser D, Schenk R, Steinemann S, Fiorellini J, Fox C and Stich H: ‘Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs’, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 1991, 25, 889–902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li D, Ferguson SJ, Beutler T, Cochran DL, Sittig C, Hirt HP and Buser D: ‘Biomechanical comparison of sandblasted and acid-etched and the machined and acid-etched titanium surface for dental implants’, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 2002, 60, 325–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wennerberg A, Wktessabi A, Albrektsson T, Joansson C and Andersson B: Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Implants, 1997, 12, 486–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klokkevold PR, Nishimura RD, Adachi M and Caputo A: ‘Osseointegration enhanced by chemical etching of the titanium surface: a torque removal study in the rabbit’, Clin. Oral Impants Res., 1997, 8, 442–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper LF, Masuda T, Yliheikkila PK and Felton DA: ‘Generalization regarding the process and phenomenon of osseointegration. Part II in vitro studies’, Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implatns, 1998, 13, (2), 163–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselme K: ‘Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials’, Biomaterials, 2000, 21, 667–681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster TJ, Ergun C, Doremus RH, Siegel RW and Bizios R: ‘Specific proteins mediate enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics’, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 2000, 51, (3), 475–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modes T, Metzner C, Siegel RW and Bizios R: ‘Structure and properties of titanium oxide layers deposited by reactive plasma activated electron beam evaporation’, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2008, 200, 306–309.
   Google Scholar
• Sousa SR, Moradass-Ferreira P, Saramago B, Melo LV and Barbosa MA: ‘Human serum albumin adsorption on titania from single protein solutions and from plasma’, Langmuir, 2004, 20, 9745–9754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa SR, Moradass-Ferreira P and Barbosa MA: ‘TiO2 type influences fibronectin adsorption’, JOM, 2005, 16, 1173–1178.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia AJ, Vega MD and Bioettiger D: ‘Modulation of cell proliferation and differentiation through substrate-dependent changes in fibronectin conformation’, Mol. Biol. Cell, 1999, 10, (3), 785–798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar