78
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Papers

Formative research on identifying and promoting responsible party-hosting skills among college students

, &

References

  • Barry AE, Goodson P. How students conceptualize and practice responsible drinking. J Am Coll Health 2011;59(4):304–12.
  • Barry AE, Goodson P. Contextual factors influencing U.S. college students' decisions to drink responsibly. Subst Use Misuse 2012;47(10):1172–84.
  • DeJong W, Anderson J, Colthurst T, Davidson L, Langford LM, Mackay-Smith VL, et al. Experiences in effective prevention: the U.S. Department of Education‘s alcohol and other drug prevention models on college campuses grant [document on the internet]; 2007 [cited 2013 October 1]. Available from: http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED511643.
  • Hingson R, Heeren T, Winter M, Wechsler H. Magnitude of alcohol-related mortality and morbidity among U.S. college students 18–24: changes from 1998–2001. Annu Rev Public Health 2005;26:259–79.
  • Hingson RW, Wenxing Z, Weitzman ER. (2009). Magnitude of and trends in alcohol-related mortality and morbidity among U.S. college students ages 18–24, 1998–2005. J Stud Alcohol 2009;16:12–20.
  • DuRant RH, McCoy TP, Champion H, Parries MT, Mirta A, Martin BA, et al. Party behaviors and characteristics and serial drunkenness among college students. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 2008;69(1):91–9.
  • Clapp JD, Ketchie JM, Reed MB, Shillington AM, Lange JE, Holmes MR. Three exploratory studies of college theme parties. Drug Alcohol Rev 2008;27(5):509–18.
  • Fournier AK, Ehrhart IJ, Glindemann KE, Geller ES. Intervening to decrease alcohol abuse at university parties: differential reinforcement of intoxication level. Behav Modif 2004;28(2):167–81.
  • Glindemann KE, Ehrhart IJ, Drake EA, Geller SE. Reducing excessive alcohol consumption at university fraternity parties: a cost-effective incentive/reward intervention. Addict Behav 2007;32(1):39–48.
  • Glindemann KE, Geller ES. A systematic assessment of intoxication at university parties: effects of the environmental context. Environ Behav 2003;35(5):655–64.
  • Harford TC, Wechsler H, Seibring M. Attendance and alcohol use at parties and bars in college. J Stud Alcohol 2002;63(6):726–33.
  • Buettner CK, Khurana A, Slesnick N. Drinking at college parties: examining the influence of student host-status and party-location. Addict Behav 2011;36(12):1365–8.
  • Weitzman ER, Nelson TF, Wechsler H. Taking up binge drinking in college: the influences of person, social group and environment. J Adolesc Health 2003;32(1):26–35.
  • Workman TA. Finding the meanings of college drinking: an analysis of fraternity drinking stories. Health Commun 2001;13(4):427–47.
  • Menning CL. Unsafe at any house? Attendees’ perceptions of microlevel environmental traits and personal safety at fraternity and non-fraternity parties. J Interpers Violence 2009;24(10):1714–34.
  • Campo S, Cameron KA. Differential effects of exposure to social norms campaigns: a cause for concern. Health Commun 2006;19(3):209–19.
  • Dejong W, Schneider SK, Towvim LG, Murphy MJ, Doerr EE, Simonsen NR, et al. A multisite randomized trial of social norms marketing campaigns to reduce college student drinking: a replication failure. Subst Abuse 2009;30(2):127–40.
  • LaBrie JW, Hummer JF, Neighbors C, Pederson ER. Live interactive group-specific normative feedback reduces misperceptions and drinking in college students: a randomized cluster trial. Psychol Addict Behav 2008;22(1):141–8.
  • Lewis MA, Neighbors C. Social norms approaches using descriptive drinking norms education: a review of the research on personalized normative feedback. J Am Coll Health 2006;54(4):213–8.
  • Thombs DL, Olds RS, Osborn CJ, Casseday S, Glavin K, Berkowitz AD. Outcomes of a technology-based social norms intervention to deter alcohol use in freshman residence halls. J Am Coll Health 2009;55(6):325–32.
  • Toomey TL, Nelson TF, Winters KC, Miazga MJ, Lenk KM, Erickson DJ. Characterizing college systems for addressing student alcohol use: latent class analysis of U.S. four-year colleges. J Study Alcohol Drugs 2013;74:777–786.
  • Wall AF. Evaluating a health education website: the case of alcoholedu. J Stud Aff Res Pract 2007;44(4):692–714.
  • Paschall MJ, Antin T, Ringwalt CL, Saltz RF. Effects of Alcoholedu for college on alcohol-related problems among freshman: a randomized multicampus trial. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 2011;72(4):642–50.
  • Wyatt TM, DeJong W, Dixon E. Population-level administration of Alcoholedu for college: an ARIMA time-series analysis. J Health Commun 2013;18(8):898–912.
  • Turrisi R, Padilla KK, Wiersma KA. College student drinking: an examination of theoretical models of drinking tendencies in freshman and upperclassman. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 2000;61(4):598–602.
  • Department of Health and Human Services. BASICS—Brief Alcohol Screening and Intervention of College Students [document on the internet]; 2012 [cited 2013 Nov 1]. Available from: http://www.lcbapps.lcb.state.pa.us/phe/_interior/_includesContent/5_BASICS_Model_Factsheet.pdf
  • Tomaka J, Palacios R, Morales-Monks S, Davis SE. An evaluation of the BASICS alcohol risk reduction model among predominantly Hispanic college students. Subst UseMisuse 2012;47(12):1260–70.
  • Carey KB, Scott-Sheldon LA, Elliott JC, Garey L, Carey MP. Face-to-face versus computer-delivered alcohol interventions for college drinkers: a meta-analytic review, 1998 to 2010. Clin Psychol Rev 2012;32(8):690–703.
  • Cronce JM, Larimer ME. Individual-focused approaches to the prevention of college student drinking. Alcohol Res Health 2011;34(2):210–21.
  • Perkins HW, Craig DW. A successful social norms campaign to reduce alcohol misuse among college student-athletes. J Stud Alcohol 2006;67(6):880–9.
  • Clapp JD, Johnson M, Voas RB, Lange JE, Shilington A, Russell C. Reducing DUI among college students: results of an environmental prevention trial. Addiction 2005;100(3):327–34.
  • Collins SE, Carey KB, Sliwinski MJ. Mailed personalized normative feedback as a brief intervention for at risk college drinkers. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 2002;63(5):559–67.
  • Turner J, Perkins HW, Bauerle J. Declining negative consequences related to alcohol misuse among students exposed to a social norms marketing intervention on a college campus. J Am Coll Health 2008;57(1):85–94.
  • Perkins HW. College student misperceptions of alcohol and other drug use norms among peers: exploring causes, consequences, and implications for prevention programs. In: US Department of Education. Designing alcohol and other drug prevention programs in higher education: bringing theory into practice. Newton, MA: Higher Education Center for Alcohol and Other Drug Prevention;1997. p. 177–206.
  • Gomberg L, Schneider SK, DeJong W. Evaluation of a social norms marketing campaign to reduce high-risk drinking at the University of Mississippi. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 2001;27(2):375–89.
  • Berkowitz AD. From reactive to proactive prevention: promoting an ecology of health on campus. In: Rivers PC, Shore E, (eds.) A handbook on substance abuse for college and university personnel. Westport, CT: Greenwood; 1997. p. 120–39.
  • Wechsler H, Lee JE, Kuo M, Seibring M, Nelson TF, Lee H. Trends in college binge drinking during a period of increased prevention efforts. Findings from 4 Harvard School of Public Health College alcohol study surveys: 1993–2001. J Am Coll Health 2002;50(5):203–18.
  • Toomey TL, Lenk KM, Wagenaar AC. Environmental policies to reduce college drinking: an update on research findings. J Study Alcohol Drugs 2007;68:208–219.
  • Hagger MS, Chatzisarantis NL. Integrating the theory of planned behavior and self-determination theory in health behavior: a meta-analysis. Br J Health Psychol 2009;14:275–302.
  • McEachan RRC, Conner M, Taylor NK, Lawton RJ. Prospective prediction of health related behaviours with the Theory of Planned Behaviour: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol Rev 2011;5(2):97–114.
  • Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1991;50(2):179–211.
  • Zimmermann F, Sieverding M. Young adults' social drinking as explained by an augmented theory of planned behaviour: the roles of prototypes, willingness, and gender. Br J Health Psychol 2010;15:561–581.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.