Publication Cover
Cochlear Implants International
An Interdisciplinary Journal for Implantable Hearing Devices
Volume 12, 2011 - Issue 4
269
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Clinical evaluation of cochlear implant sound coding taking into account conjectural masking functions, MP3000™

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 194-204 | Published online: 18 Jul 2013

References

  • Abbas P.J., Hughes M.L., Brown C.J., Miller C.A., South H. 2004. Channel interaction in cochlear implant users evaluated using the electrically evoked compound action potential. Audiology and Neuro-Otology, 9(4): 203–213.
  • Buechner A., Noguiera W., Edler B., Battmer R.-D., Lenarz T. 2008. Results from a psychoacoustic model-based strategy for the Nucleus-24 and Freedom cochlear implants. Otology & Neurotology, 29: 189–192.
  • Buechner A., Frohe-Buechner C., Boyle P., Battmer R.-D., Lenarz T. 2009. A high rate n-of-m speech processing strategy for the first generation Clarion cochlear implant. International Journal of Audiology, 48: 868–875.
  • Cohen L.T. 2009. Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 2. Spread of the effective stimulation field (ESF) from ECAP and FEA. Hearing Research, 247: 100–111.
  • Cohen L.T., Saunders E., Richardson L.M. 2004. Spatial spread of neural excitation: comparison of compound action potential and forward-masking data in cochlear implant patients. International Journal of Audiology, 43: 346–355.
  • Cohen L.T., Lenarz T., Battmer R.-D., Bender von Saebelkampf C., Busby P.A., Cowan R.S.C. 2005. A psychophysical forward masking comparison of longitudinal spread of neural excitation in the Contour and straight Nucleus electrode arrays. International Journal of Audiology, 44: 559–566.
  • Fishman K.E., Shannon R.V., Slatterly W.H. 1997. Speech recognition as a function of the number of electrodes used in the SPEAK cochlear implant speech processor. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 40: 1201–1215.
  • Friesen L.M., Shannon R.V., Baskent D., Wang X. 2001. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 110: 1150–1163.
  • Jayant N., Johnston J., Safranek R. 1993. Signal compression based on models of human perception. Proceedings of the IEEE 81, 10: 1385–1422.
  • Kals M., Schatzer R., Krenmayr A., Vermeire K., Visser D., Bader P., et al. 2010. Results with a cochlear implant channel-picking strategy base on ‘Selected Groups’. Hearing Research, 260: 63–39.
  • Lai W., Dillier N. 2008. Investigating the MP3000 coding strategy for music perception. Proceedings 11th. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Audiologie, Kiel, 1–3.
  • McDermott H.J., McKay C.M., Vandali A.E. 1992. A new portable sound processor for the University of Melbourne/Nucleus multi-electrode cochlear implant. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 91: 3367–3371.
  • McKay C.M., McDermott H.J., Vandali A.E., Clark G. 1991. Preliminary results with a six spectral maxima sound processor for the University of Melbourne/Nucleus multiple-electrode cochlear implant. Journal of Otolaryngological Society of Australia, 6: 354–359.
  • Nogueira W., Büchner A., Lenarz T., Edler B. 2005. A psychoacoustic ‘NofM’-type speech coding strategy for cochlear implants. EURASIP Journal of Applied Signal Processing, 18: 3044–3059.
  • Plant K.L., Whitford L.A., Psarros C.E., Vandali A.E. 2002. Parameter selection and programming recommendations for the ACE and CIS speech-processing strategies in the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system. Cochlear Implant International, 3: 104–125.
  • Weert S., van Stokroos R.J., Rikers M.M.J.G., van Dijk P. 2005. Effect of peri-modiolar cochlear implant positioning on auditory nerve responses: A neural response telemetry study. Acta Otolaryngology, 125: 725–731.
  • Wilson B.S., Finley C.C., Farmer J.C., Lawson D.T., Weber B.A., Wolford R.D., et al. 1988. Comparative studies of speech processing strategies for cochlear implants. Laryngoscope, 98: 1069–1077.
  • Wilson B.S., Finley C.C., Lawson D.T., Wolford R.D., Eddington D.L., Rabinowitz W.M. 1991. Better speech recognition with cochlear implants. Nature, 352: 236–238.
  • Wilson B.S., Lawson D.T., Zerbi M., Finley C.C., Wolford R.D. 1995. New processing strategies in cochlear implantation. American Journal of Otology, 16: 669–675.
  • Ziese M., Stutzel A., Specht A., von Begall H., Freigang B., Sroka B,, Nopp P. 2000. Speech understanding with the CIS and the n-of-m strategy in the MED-EL COMBI 40+ system. Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Related Species, 62: 321–329.
  • Zwicker E., Feldtkeller R. 1967. Das Ohr als Nachrichtenempfänger. S. Hirzel Verlag, Stuttgart
  • Zwicker E,, Fastl H. 1990. Psychoacoustics: Facts and Models. Berlin: Springer.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.